>>54
>Pedophilia: A paraphilia in which sexual gratification is derived from fantasies or sexual acts involving a child.
To say that fapping to loli doesn't make one a pedophile would be like saying fapping to drawings of dogs isn't zoophilia. Hell, it would be like saying fapping to drawings of women isn't straight.
<but loli is a broad term that includes adult women with skinny bodies
Oh, so you'd agree to ban all pornographic drawings that unambiguously depict children? No? Then why even bring this point up?
<but the drawings don't look that much like real children
Why, because of the moe-goblin face? Does that logic apply to anime women? By that logic, you'd agree that drawings which lean on the more realistic end of the spectrum should be banned. But I think you'd disagree if the government banned all loli except the moe-goblin kind, so it's just a another red-herring you only brought up to try winning the argument. I'd say If you can tell from the art work that its a child's body, then it's pedophilic.
<but there's a massive disconnect between what lolis are depicted as being able to do, like taking massive dicks, and what real children can.
And? hentai characters are depicted taking things real people can't all the time like taking massive fire-hydrant sized dicks or larger still, imagination's the limit. By that logic, fapping to drawings of women isn't straight and fapping to drawings of dogs isn't zoophillia.
<but by that logic playing violent vidya makes you a sadist
Now you're just being disingenuous. Though I'd sooner agree that violent vidya is sadism than disagree that loli is pedophilic.
Ultimately, you only think fapping to loli isn't pedophilic because your emotions tell you it's not.
Also, loli is gay as lolis have no secondary sexual features.
<but by that logic futa is straight
No, you're attracted to lolis specifically for their androgynous little boy bodies. You like them specifically for their lack of feminine features, that makes you a faggot.