>>55539 > even AI can't redeem OKx4's art

I used to use tensor.art a couple of months ago, but then lost interest in making new images. I tried to come back, but found out that they removed all of their ABDL loras, and can't make a good image for shit. Is there any other site out there like tensor.art with a lora library? most of the sites I've found let you put the prompt and that's it.

Don't end up like them

Anyway to get past Civitai blocking the Diaper prompt?

>>55692 For context: https://inkbunny.net/s/3720704

grok is pretty cooked https://assets.grok.com/users/974611ce-ddcb-41e3-a1c2-e4e87cdb246b/generated/c8127efa-84f2-45ee-8350-b7ce412f2484/generated_video.mp4?cache=1 https://assets.grok.com/users/974611ce-ddcb-41e3-a1c2-e4e87cdb246b/generated/a86ec6a5-a439-4bd7-b17c-b655932f853b/generated_video.mp4?cache=1 > prompt pop web comic style reddit artist webcomic full body adult attractive young woman pale brunette flushed embarassed wearing nightshirt and adult medical diaper tena abena wetness indicators lying in bed, uncovered, sleping pose desperate to pee, diaper wet tinged yellow

>>55915 >error 403

Anyone playing with the new Z Image Turbo model today. It can't do very good diapers, but it's uncensored, bobs and vagene, and it can do celebrities too and the few logos I tried worked well. It works really well on consumer GPUs too. Hopefully since it is so small loras can be trained for it.

>>56065 If that's the base diaper, that's incredible. Pull up style depends are far more common than the tape styles. Seems they released the base model too. I'll wait for Koyha to add support, but I'm cautiously optimistic.

>>54349 The abena lora seems to be missing. Is there anywhere else this one could be? Also currently have 2 3090tis, an A4000 and 128Gb of system ram, Gpus are watercooled. Should I be concerned about running out of resources doing generation?

>>56210 >Should I be concerned about running out of resources doing generation? Yes since we can only use one gpu core to gen. Multigpu setups are more llm thing I think.

Managed to get this outta gpt. Brite and Dark Bomber

>>56162 Ai toolkit can do loras for Z image and it is fairly easy. Took me just over 4 hours on a 5060ti with 16gb of ram. I just used an image set from my flux loras and it came out mostly good. It has issues if the diaper is partially covered though, but that could be my training set. I still need to try out all the gens it saved to see if they are any better, but I am mostly happy with this.

>>56426 Mind posting it? All my ZiT training comes out as noise. There's some shit broken in the trainer.

I'll wait for the base model. Distilled models are just an inference gimmick. Yes, they can be trained, and you can also eat ice cream with chopsticks. I'll wait for a spoon.

>>56458 I would be willing to put forth the effort and time to create some Z-Image loras using your data sets from your flux loras. I have never trained a lora before, but if you would be willing to guide me in the right direction I'll gladly make them and post them all here for everyone. Is there a particular guide that you can send my way that I can follow?

played around on a paid site for way too long. got some images, have no idea what I was doing

>>56467 I'm not dead. z-image turbo is closer to sdxl than flux. flux was so focused on making people that training with sex dolls didn't make a difference. z-image turbo feels more like sdxl in that it learns everything in the image. My flux photo sets are useless as is for the turbo model. Once the base model is available, I'll take more pictures if needed. Steal a few naughty images from twitter and you won't be any further behind than anyone else training abdl loras.

>>56944 Mod baby here (not sure if I was able to crosscheck/cross reference the abdl game#5 thread) I was wondering if theres anyone here willing to help me create better images for the tower of regression mod im making ! Nothing really "wrong" with the images but the ai slopyy/chatgpt pics could definitely be improved upon.

>>56486 Diapered Prego are so hard to find. More please?

>>57015 i'll throw out what I have but I am not buying more credits for this site. (i´m too tempted to get more than I afford and) so that's what I got. i'm too dumb to self host like many do here, these were made on a site called easyremove I first took a young face and put her in swimsuits and such. then i'd upload outputs to make her pregnant and put her in more appropriate clothes and situations. it was a trial and error thing and getting around nanobanana's decency filter was a challenge too. turns out it doesn't care about diapering someone as long as she isn't considered underage and won't show any naughtybits. it's been a fun experiment though. feel free to try for yourself.

Fucked around with grok and got some decent stuff. Pretty easy to get past blocks. And did edits of people i know irl

>>57174 Thank you again.

>>57223 damn those are solid, what prompt did you use for the first one?

>>57243 Started with a existing photo and used a few prompts that were basically "Replace her shorts with a diaper and put a pacifier in her mouth." Once I took it into Imagine, I said "Have her rub her diaper and take her pacifier out of her mouth and sweetly say "Xxxx"." Took a bit of trial and error with a few words and re-running them but honestly they were pretty simple prompts to get what I wanted. I'll post some more later today.

Here's some more I did. Super simple and direct prompts. Sometimes it flags "rub" so I'll sub in "touch". Also started from an image that either already has a diaper or you've manipulated to have one works way better.

Is anyone aware of any image to video sites that rival Grok? The reason I am using Grok right now is due to how easy it is to circumvent the free limitations. All you really need to do is create several email addresses and you can essentially create forever, but of course that is still on a free plan. I'd consider purchasing an actual plan but I am unsure if Grok's paid plan is better or has less/more restrictions on prompts. Any suggestions or information would be appreciated.

>>57265 New open video model for T2V and I2V (with audio) came out. Need at least 24 GB VRAM and 64 GB RAM to run it, so as a poorfag I couldn't really test it. People seem to like it though - I'm curious how it handles diaps https://huggingface.co/Lightricks/LTX-2

>>57273 There's an FP8 version of ltx-2 that supposedly works with 16gb of vram and 32gb of system memory. I have yet to try it but reddit says it should work.

>>57265 I never tried image to video on a free plan, I stupidly thought you had to pay for it. That said, I’ve been surprised with how much I can get away with. Even images that get flagged almost immediately, I can eventually get to create something but trying over and over again with more benign prompts to almost kickstart it.

I can't trick grok into depicting wetting so here's some potty facial expressions for the imagination. >>57246 Good to know.