>>54060 I find that up-scaling qwen with flux and then inpainting diapers or whatever with all the old flux loras works really well.

>>54067 Where can I do inpainting? Not OP, just curious about it. It's the only AI image thing that I've yet to mess around with. Like what do you mean "with all the old flux loras"?

>>54083 I inpaint with comfyui. You basically paint over an area that you want to change and prompt what you want it to change it to. Google it. As for Loras, back when civitai still allowed diaper content there were a handful of loras that you could prompt to generate real diapers. The problem is they only worked with the flux lora and base flux doesn't look nearly as good as qwen. In painting lets you add diapers to pretty much any image assuming you have the loras to do it or you are ok with the crappy diapers that the current models generate. I'm not sure if the loras are still floating around or not, google might be able to find them, idk

>>54060 /r/ing women turning into babies

For me, it's Whisk. The fact that I can do this in about 5 seconds, seemingly unlimited, for free, and with no PC or download required, is amazing. First image is the original found online, the rest of them are edits of the subject based on prompts. Throw these into an img2vid like Kling or Hailuo and we are living in unprecedented diaper porn times.

>>54144 I've been able to get Whisk to make diapers but only occasionally. At times it just starts giving me instant "Oops! Something went wrong!" notifications. So I'm really unsure what triggers it to consider an image nsfw and block it.

>>54145 One of the main reasons it never worked for me at first is because I was trying to prompt the diaper without also prompting the shirt / top, and it's probably rejecting based a topless output. As soon as I started saying "wearing a shirt and disposable diaper" instead of just "wearing a disposable diaper", success rate improved drastically. I learned more too. Here is how I get it to work. I'll be talking mainly about using a source image / subject(s). Source Image === - Image cannot be too famous, the person can be, but not the particular image. For instance, Sweeney American Eagle photos were auto-rejected. Same with Ortega, I had to find a picture that worked where you can see it was her, but one that AI did not recognize they were famous (still experimenting) - Headshots or torso up images work way better. This is because if there is other clothing where the diaper is supposed to go, Whisk will have a hard time replacing it, though not impossible as seen in my post above - You can use multiple subjects, I've tried up to 3. Prompting === From what I've tried, it's all about putting the right combination of parts in a particular order. Changing them around, removing / adding, and trying different words can affect the output quite a bit. Here are the parts of my prompts that I've tried that work well: full body close view, shot, photo, image, picture, showing subject, subjects, two subjects, three subjects wearing [describe the top / shirt] and wearing [describe the diaper], [describe the activity], [describe the background / setting] I describe the diaper in the following ways. wearing a disposable diaper wearing a big bulky diaper wearing a big thick bulky diaper wearing a thick diaper wearing a disposable nappy wearing a swollen diaper The first image was the result of this prompt and the first source photo: "full body side shot subject posing hand behind head wearing cropped jean shirt and big bulky diaper during a photoshoot, looking at viewer, package of Pampers diapers on a stool behind her, gray backdrop" Again, it's all about adding words, removing words, changing the order of words, trying different descriptions, and seeing what gives you a result. Nothing overtly sexual of course, be creative. It's so fast, you should be able to try a lot of combinations in a short amount of time. Your subjects will appear in the order you uploaded them, and even this can change the output and even its composition. Removing someone's bottoms and replacing it with a diaper can work based on if you used view, shot, photo, image, picture, or none that I listed above. As long as you describe a top (shirt) and a diaper, and not just the diaper, you should be good.

aren't you worried about getting caught for CP? every like 20 images it would generate an actual child. And since you can't sign up for google without a phone number, I couldn't figure out a way to do it truly anonymously.

>>54186 >I couldn't figure out a way to do it truly anonymously It's called running local

>>54189 Newfag here, how do you run local? I really like >>54167 's results. I wouldn't mind doing it from a website but anonymously is always better. I'd use a burner account anyway.

>>54144 >>54167 Patched? I literally could not get anything diaper related.

>>54167 oooooooooooooooooo

>>54186 I haven't ever gotten a single image of a child, not sure what you're prompting for that. Also, gmail doesn't require a phone #, and use VPN if you want. >>54190 You can download ComfyUI or ForgeUI. From here, you download models and start generating images. Keep in mind, you need a decent PC and good graphics card (12GB or higher VRAM). I like the Flux model, and I even made 3 diaper loras for it, will share the link to them in next post. Plenty of tutorials on YouTube, but yeah, local generation is great and completely uncensored. Whisk, while censored, is excellent for my tastes and is just way easier and faster to use, and the quality is often better than local, but it can't do everything. Again, it depends on what you're trying to do, your tastes and your creativity. >>54191 I don't think so, attached images are from just before I made this post. Check my notes >>54167

>>54193 I couldent resist

>>54223 >>54193 POV greta bullies you into going on the boat with her and now you're both now in a cell with no toilets

>>54243 What prompt did you use for the nose holding one?

>>54167 Have you been able to get Whisk to generate images where the subject has a hand pressing into the crotch of the diaper? Or even just resting on the lower part of the front of the diaper. I messed around a while back and managed to get it to do it one time, but I can't seem to replicate it no matter the prompt. I've pretty much mastered how to get an O face, but I can't get the hand to actually be in a masturbating position.

>>54314 To the touch hands on hands on top of embracing reaching out etc etc I'm not sure how you're not getting it to work

>>54197 >>54223 >>54243 kek well done anon. All need is one of her getting spanked as well.

>>54197 Plz share your loras for Flux

>>54319 The pics you shared have her touching the waistband of the diaper, last I checked you don't masturbate by pressing into your gut. I was saying I can't get the hand to be positioned any lower than the waistband

>>54342 Sorry about that, here they are on huggingface https://huggingface.co/Adamtwo22 Cushies, AbenaM4 and Tena are there

>>54349 Thanks. I'd kill to have separate Loras for baby diapers: pampers, luvs, huggies. I am a newfag and don't know how to train yet.

>>54351 What model do you want to train for and what's your gpu and ram?

>>54197 Preferably WAN 2.2 high and low since there exists basically no diaper LoRAs for that. 4090 and 64 GB RAM.

>>54349 That forth image is a disaster upon my dick.

>>54473 This is very interesting. Well-made. Very believable.

>>54448 >wan Yeah I have no idea how do you tag videos, sry. But AB Dreams would make for a great source material for sure.

>>54482 >>54473 I never tried Sora, but this inspired me! Especially this one: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qXmaXbGVmPE I tried it out and made a compilation, it's pretty fun.

>>54490 Oh wow this is very cool, I want more now.

>>54492 What will happen even in Sora even if you use an image is it will render a very basic diaper or it will badly distort a diaper that has designs on it like any baby diaper or any ABDL diaper.

>>54490 Good lord, AI really is only good for pictures and text. No human being talks or moves like this.

>>54490 Has anyone tried WAN 2.5 for ABDL vids?

Ew gross

>>54547 Their image to video seems very much okay with ABDL stuff. The first frame is from Whisk, this is the prompt I gave to WAN: The woman in pink stares at the screen, her hands exploring her thighs and diaper while she babbles babyish phrases affirming she needs her diapers. It could probably be improved with more specificity, but it seems good to me.

>>54508 And even just still images and text it has trouble with so needs a lot of handholding and editing. It's still mainly only good for memes, shit posting, and easy low quality porn or stock images for anyone with functional pattern recognition. It's insane there's people convinced this is in any way conscious and killing themselves over their chatbot waifus. >>54563 >seems good to me The video may as well be poorly photoshopped gif with how stiff and unnatural the movement looks. The voice is so bad it sounds worse and less natural than just Windows Text to Speech. There's both light from the front of the TV and a screen visible on the back for some reason. The background, foreground, and girl are all out of proportion because the AI has trouble with scale and perspective. How is this "good"? How autistic are you to think this is "good"?

>>54473 What was the prompt for this? It's pretty good.

>>54563 I like it anon, dont listen to that hater

>>54563 how do you get the credits for the WAN site anon? I am not paying for porn

>>54574 You can generate even without credits, it just takes a long-ass time. You also get 10 daily for free. I just use a burner account

>>54573 I mean I realize it's not the best thing ever, but with how censored some of the free models are, the fact that it's okay with touching diapers like that shows it has some potentials

>>54492 I am obsessed. Here are some more fake diaper ads and other clips I made, had to compress. Audio / voice acting is not as good as Veo3, but I think Sora is really good at most everything else. Not perfect of course, and you're not going to get any sexual content out of it unless you're really creative with your prompts, but enjoying this stuff depends on how much of a stickler you are for the AI actually being "realistic" enough for you to enjoy it. For me, I appreciate the progress made in this technology in being able to bring fun ideas to "life". I also think what these two are doing with Sora is cool: https://www.instagram.com/robo_nursery/ https://www.youtube.com/@BlushSocial/videos (shorts and videos) >>54563 Voice is not great lol, but the video does have potential like >>54582 says. WAN at least seems like it can be uncensored and ran locally I believe? I want to try using this next to see what can be produced. Can't get anything else to have the subject touch the diaper at the crotch, believe me I've tried.

>>54573 Eh, doesn't really seem useful to pretend AI generated video and images are better than they actually are either. There's okay stuff out there, but not anything would call good without a lot of editing and work. AI generation makes very basic mistakes because it just has digital training data and no real world reference. This is what annoys me the most about artists and writers who are zealously anti-AI. If an artist or writer is worried about AI stealing their lunch and not seeing it as a tool that still needs a lot of human involvement they're probably not a good writer or artist in the first place. >>54590 And yeah, the voice is the worst part. If this were just a still image and not a video I'd say it's okay for AI, but not good or great.

>>54581 oh man thanks, this is awesome the one without sound I generated with Whisk, it was supposed to say "well look like someone wants to be my baby after all" the other one I generated with WAN 2.5, there are soooooooooo many sites even with similar names for the tools nowadays I am suprised I managed to find you were referring to

Does anyone have any tips on inpainting diapers? I have pictures that I would like to inpaint diapers into, or alternatively to use a person/character's appearance as part of the prompt and create diapered scenes involving them. Preferably local as don't want to share this with google lmao. Have access to decent hardware. Wondering: What tool to use? What models to rely on? Workflow for inpainting?

>>54662 qwen edit probably

Whisk may be done. I made an account a week or two ago and they just asked me to verify my age to use it.

>>54662 I use comfyui and this workflow for flux. It works well to inpaint diapers as long as your original image already has a diaper or panties but you really have to mess with denoise to get it to remove pants. Foocus is also goated for inpainting but it doesn't support flux which most of the good diaper loras are made for. There are forks that supposedly work but i'm too lazy to try them. My image was a wan2.2 T2I that I inpainted with flux and I think it looks great.

>>54721 It's a Google account, just use a fake birthday. Whisk works great.

>>54662 The fastest I've done is by using ComfyUI and Flux Kontext. Works with diaper flux loras, but the diapers won't look nearly as detailed because Kontext, while still flux, is a different model. However, it does a good job at removing bottoms / pants and replacing them with a diaper just using a prompt. It can even add legs or a lower body where it didn't originally exist. (if you make the output image larger than the input) You can do inpainting in regular flux to fix up the diaper and add the detail you want later. Main prompt is: remove her bottoms and make her wear an abenaM4 diaper secured with blue tabs and her legs exposed Workflow and examples below. Modify accordingly.

>>54731 Yeah Whisk is incredible, but they won't let me use it. I have a few accounts and they want me to verify my id to use whisk. Which means sending my ID or a photo which obviously I'm not going to do. I would have set my age to be really old anyway during my account making process anyway. I'm curious how you get to keep using it. I need a way to bypass this forced ID thing.

>>54732 I find that kontext can really mess with image quality and have stopped using it. It's easier to just use another, better, model like wan to qwen and just inpaint with flux.