>>22747 Nice archive. Any removal of required reading of holocaust propaganda is a good thing.

In my district, teachers can pretty much assign whatever they want as long as they don't get too many complaints. The problem is that most teachers are stacy SJWs so they assign nothing but SJW shit. But usually it's not something that all classes are forced to do, so some classes can avoid it, if they're one of the few with a decent teacher. It's better than the district assigning something, because the higher up the ladder you go, the more SJW they are. Also, teachers are discouraged from assigning specific books, and are encouraged to give students choices, but this doesn't always happen, or sometimes they give only a few choices, and they're all SJW garbage. Anyway, it's weird that that school board makes all students in the board read a particular book. And yes, I'm sick of it being holocaust porn like Maus. Every damn book I ever had to read in school was about the holocaust or rape, or both. This is what makes kids hate reading. They're forced to read things that nobody likes, but the SJW stacy 40 year old women pretend to like. Just assign something fun that kids actually like. But the stacy SJW women are too stupid to understand the literary value of entire genres, like fantasy or sci-fi. And now they're encouraged to assign comics, but they're too stupid to understand the literary value of superheroes, so you only get shit like Maus. If you're very lucky, you'll get Watchmen or The Dark Knight Returns, but the teachers who will assign that are few and far between. And then SJWs will complain about the content, even though Watchmen is ultimately on their side, and The Dark Knight Returns isn't exactly extreme in its very vague political themes, which basically consist of proto-SJWs calling Batman a fascist. So of course SJWs hate that one, but they won't admit why. Instead they just complain that it's violent. Meanwhile all of the books they assign are about holocaust and rape. But oh, the fact that Watchmen has a rape as part of the story is still the excuse they'll use to say it is bad and shouldn't be assigned, but their own rape porn should.

>>22749 I don't know where to start archiving. Have you tried Duck-duck-go-ing "Maus ban"? Yeah. I don't give a shit about them removing the Lolocaust porn. It's the bullshit that surrounds it: "The other side uses lies to appeal to outrage, and here are some lies made to appeal to your outrage." And then, it is the people who would demand content warnings on the book, because they don't believe such content is suitable for grown-ass adults. THOSE people are the ones who are saying that the book is fit for teenagers. Holy fuck, if the reason it was pulled from the curriculum was that some students could be triggered by the depiction of Spiegleman's mother's suicide, we wouldn't even be talking about this. It wouldn't be national news. It would have gone quietly into the night, like this turd of a story should have. But, no, the MSM have latched onto this fabrication to further a story about book banning, which I have to assume is bullshit, why would you need to make up lies if it were true? >>22751 Oh, it's that teacher guy. Can we solve the hubris of the academics, who hold that to be anti-academic is to be anti-intellectual?

>>22758 I like teacher anon. He made his class read Alan Moore. Not the swamp thing issue where Alan took LSD and wrote about plant/human sex. But still. Pretty cool.

I don't even agree with most of you Neo-Nazis. It's just that I can't fit in with the Left, because I was raised to be suspicious of religion, and that shit that comes out of the ivory towers of academia is religion. Let me demonstrate: Black Lives Matter is the assertion that black Americans are targeted for killing by the police in America (I'm going to pick on BLM, but the logic equally applies to the "wage gap" of Feminism). To demonstrate this, statistics are presented which show a disparity. Now, a disparity can be used to infer discrimination, if all other things are equal. Are all other things equal? Fuck no. You know that, I know that, and half of Americans deny that. As all other things are not equal, it is logically invalid to infer discrimination from the disparity. As such, the beliefs of Black Lives Matter are maintained without logically valid reasons for doing so. What is the name of illogical beliefs that someone holds because they were educated to believe them? Beliefs that someone has in spite of a lack of evidence? Beliefs that someone so strongly believes in that they will invent "evidence" to prove them? ■ And that's really what the culture war is about. This new-age religion of Social Justice is trying to supplant a real religion. And it is frustrating to me to see all of these "Well Educated Idiots" who are unable to see that their beliefs are religion. Useful idiots? More like Useless idiots.

>>22763 >Nazis hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, nice joke. But your opinion is alright.

>>22758 >I don't know where to start archiving. Have you tried Duck-duck-go-ing "Maus ban"? To go archive.today an put in the URL of the source article you used for the OP, then paste the final URL here.

>>22763 >I was raised to be suspicious of religion And you're a fag for believing that.

It's very much excepted considering how the majority of news today feels like a rag not fit to wipe your ass with and the only way they can get attention and clicks is with borderline lies in headlines and reporting. I'd like an archive though. >>22758 >Can we solve the hubris of the academics, who hold that to be anti-academic is to be anti-intellectual? To what end though? Fuck them, if their behaviors is what passes for intellectualism it's laughable. I know this is a very naive stance to take but I like to think anyone capable and willing to make something worthwhile will do so regardless of labels or cliques. >>22751 I'm curious, what kind of rape porn do modern stacy SJW teachers assign? Asking for a friend of course.

>>22758 >Can we solve the hubris of the academics, who hold that to be anti-academic is to be anti-intellectual? Hit them in their wallets. Home school your kids and encourage others to do the same. Note that home school doesn't mean that everyone only teaches their own kids (though I do think that has an appeal). Many home schoolers get together and make their own small classes, with parents each teaching one day every week or two, each able to focus on the subjects that they know best, which they are frequently actually specialists and experts in, since they all have hands-on experience with their varied careers, unlike teachers. Also, many home-schoolers hire independent teachers, but now the teachers work for the students and parents, and not some administration. Even private schools are still corrupted by administration, which is an extra step of separation from the students and parents. And private schools are also still cucked by government rules. Home schools have very few government rules, since technically they're legally classified as daycares, if anything, and the students just need to pass a few standardized tests, like the GED and things like that, in order to get the qualifications. Because go ahead and ask any actual students at any level of education, and they all know school is a waste of time, and they're only going to get qualifications so the government will allow them to have jobs. Anyway, home school and then academics will lose many of their jobs, mostly in administration anyway, since they're all just middle managers who are just more evil versions of the Pointy Haired Boss from Dilbert. At least his evil was simply banal. School administrators are responsible for pushing the SJW shit more than the teachers are. The teachers you see doing it willfully are a minority. Even the ones that are SJW will usually not go out of their way to make things more SJW, because really they're just there to collect a paycheck, and simply reusing textbooks and assignments from 20 years ago is easier. But administration forces them to make things more SJW. So home school, or private school if you can't home school (though that isn't as good), and the few people left in the education industry will be more beholden to students and parents instead of administrators and government. Universities are already losing their power as more and more average people are realizing they're nothing but cults that the government funds and says are the only groups that can give licenses that the government deems are legally required to hold certain jobs. While the latter is still a factor for people, the illusion that they actually teach anything is gone, and their proportional numbers are dropping, especially among people who actually do useful things for society, AKA men. Of course the problem then is that since the jobs that require qualifications are less done by men and more done by the cult-brainwashed women, the jobs end up not getting done at all, or done badly, and then you get engineers trained in how traditional bridge structures are misogynist, and hired because they are women and not because their designs are best, and then our bridges collapse. And for all the liberal arts majors these institutions churn out, who think they are brilliant artists who can see the underlying meanings of everything, none of them will stop to realize that those bridges are microcosms of society. But so be it. Since the government gives the universities so much power, they won't fix themselves. Either the people rise up and fix the government, or society collapses. I'll take either option at this point. It's better to fuck off innawoods and be left alone in hell than to serve in heaven. Pic related. It's George Costanza home schooling, not wasting his time in school with that maniac Mr. Bevilacqua, trying to climb a stupid rope. If only he was able to just stay at home and learn on his own, maybe he wouldn't be so fucking stupid. Maybe he could have ended up like that nice boy, Lloyd Braun. Well maybe not with his parents, but they could have hired somebody.

>>22767 >I know this is a very naive stance to take but I like to think anyone capable and willing to make something worthwhile will do so regardless of labels or cliques. The people capable of building bridges aren't allowed to do so unless they get authorization from a university, which demands that instead of learning how to build bridges, they spend the better part of a decade learning why they are evil for being male and white and not liking penises in their butts. So many people who are capable don't sign up for the training, or stop going because they realize they aren't being trained at all. But oh, wait, many of the people who would be capable aren't even accepted into the training because they are white (or asian) and male, and they don't like penises in their butts, but plenty of unqualified "people" get in literally because they aren't those things. The people who do finish the training haven't learned anything, and their grades are at least partially based on the same factors that got them into the school, instead of how well they can design and build bridges. And the graduates that then get hired aren't hired on their merit anyway, they're hired based on the same factors that got them into the schools. Then bridges fall down. Your only hope is the people who were actually qualified, worked even harder than they should need to so that their grades were so damn high they couldn't be ignored even though they were the wrong race and sex, and they had the wrong opinion on if it feels good to take a penis in the butt. Then those people had to sit through nearly a decade of soul crushing time wasting, being told in every "class" that they are evil for the way they were born, and that their hard work only makes them more evil. Then they have to continue being leagues better, and even then, they'll lose out on many jobs, but they might get some, and those bridges might not fall down. Except bridges take many people, and some of the others might be unqualified hires, and they might fuck things up anyway. Meanwhile if people who are qualified but don't want to put up with all that bullshit try to build a bridge, the government will stop them and put them in jail, or steal enough money that their lives will be ruined. So those people go off to become other things instead. And those things may be useful, but so are bridges, and those aren't gonna get built to as high standards as we had for thousands of years, because the government won't allow them to be. We have bridges from Ancient Rome that are still in use. Meanwhile we have modern bridges where the government is so busy celebrating that they only allowed women to work on their construction that they don't care that the bridges collapse within six months and kill hundreds of people. And again, bridges are just an example, and a microcosm of society. >I'm curious, what kind of rape porn do modern stacy SJW teachers assign? A teenage girl goes to a party and gets drunk, then she fucks chad thundercock, but later decides she doesn't like the realization that she is a slut, so she cries rape, and the guy gets his life ruined. The end. There. I just told 45% of the books that are assigned in Junior High and High Schools. Another 45% is about the holocaust. Maybe 10% is actual stuff that a kid might like, or is at least classic enough that the kid would learn some bit of literary canon and understand cultural references better. But oh wait, I forgot that now everything is about racism. So now it's 33% rape, 33% holocaust, and 33% racism. 1% standards or classics or things kids (or anyone who isn't a 40 year old SJW stacy) might actually like. But note that there is significant crossover between these groups. Many things will have holocaust, racism, and rape, or at least two of the three. In fact I'd say most would have significant crossover of at least two of the three. Rape is usually involved. Racism and holocaust don't cross over much though because jews and blacks both don't want to share the spotlight, but almost every book assigned will be written by a feminist cunt, and have rape in the holocaust, or rape that is somehow based on racism (which makes no fucking sense because, as other boards on this site, and dating site stats, for that matter, will show you, racists don't want to touch, let alone fuck, the races that disgust them). Also there is crossover between what I am counting as a "standard" or "classic" and the other three categories. I'm not going to complain about To Kill A Mockingbird because at least it is a very influential work that is commonly referenced in American society, so reading it will give students an understanding of those ubiquitous references. Also it isn't even really about racism at its core, it's about prejudice in general, as exemplified by Boo Radley being a much more important part of the book than Tom Robinson, but most teachers are too stupid to understand this. Also there are cases like Othello, where dumbass SJWs will try to claim that the moors were black and then make the whole thing about black people, even though A) the moors weren't black and a fucking cursory knowledge or google search of basic history would teach you this, and anyone with this Costanza-esque level of illiteracy of basic history shouldn't be a teacher anyway, and B) Othello's race is a side issue to the story at best. But they make it all about that instead of the themes that are far more prevalent in the play. But still, I'm not going to lump in Othello with all the black supremacist shit they're forcing on children, just because they teach it wrong. Again, Shakespeare is very culturally important, and at the very least, by knowing it, students would be able to interact more with a culture that constantly references it, so it is a much more valid choice to assign in schools than most things. The problem isn't that Othello shouldn't be assigned to students, it's that those teachers who teach it wrong shouldn't be assigned to students. And to answer your spoiler, don't worry, none of the rape porn is explicit. What makes them cum isn't the descriptions of chad cock, it's getting immersed in the feeling of "victimhood." "Ooh, yes, everyone feels bad for me. Ohh, they're all gonna kill that mean boy that I already had my way with before I stopped and thought about how he doesn't have enough money or status to help me monkey-branch up the social ladder. Ugggh, I love convincing myself that not only am I not a slut for cheating on Beta Brad with Chad Thundercock, but actually I'm the victim and therefore everyone else will treat me better. Mmmh, I'm so oppressed. I'm not a rich stacy that's never been told no in her life, and never felt an ounce of true loneliness or want, because not only am I too selfish and uncaring to be thankful for what I have, but my own fucked up worldview relies on convincing myself that all the people I hurt deserve it because they were born more privileged than me, even though my life is objectively better in every conceivable way. Oooh it's so good!." >>22763 You understand everything but you still call everyone who agrees with you Neo-Nazis. You realize that the same people who told you to call us Neo-Nazis think you are too, right? The very views you shared in that post are exactly why they call us Neo-Nazis, and you are no different.

american news is not only a joke when it comes to being informative, it's actually poison being pumped into the veins of the people who watch it.