>>49354 I can think of worse. Andy Samberg. Russell Brand. Pauly Shore. Shia LaBeouf. Coin toss if Jesse Eisenberg will be fine or the worst.

>>49354 Serkis is an AInigger, while Seth Rogan is a walking biohazard. This will be as crude as Sausage Party, and the novel's plot will be warped into "orange man bad", which is actually true in the current era.

>>49354 These fuckers are going to deliberetly scrub all negative references to the commies and just replace it with nqzi shit instead. This will confirm my belief that alot of nazi hate these days is just a distraction by Hollywood to get you to forget the commies did the same and worse.

>>49354 And a troon. It’s like they’re signaling “Don’t worry, this won’t have any anti-Communist messaging, we’re on the correct side”.

>>49354 OLD FILM GOOD NEW FILM BAD

>>49390 That's called a psyop

>>49354 I had an idea for an Animal Farm movie that was animated like a renaissance Disney movie, and have it really lean into the depressing tone and events of the book. It's to kind of juxtapose the cute visuals with the harrowing experiences the animal's will face. What I'm saying is they'll do the exact opposite of this and """subtly""" promote the exact opposite message of the original work.

>>49354 The book was made by a liberal commie who kinda worshiped trotsky in the book. So it won't ruin the book the book was already kinda shit.

>>49436 Orwell was a socialist and presented the Trotsky analogue as an ineffectual intellectual outplayed by someone who understood actual power structures.

>>49446 Erm akshually he was an anarchist

No that's "And, of course, Kevin Smith."

are the CIA the producers of this one also? They are legit on record for making the first movie

>>49395 >they're putting up one of their shields they recruited to support the divide-and-conquer psyop >I guess it'll be Communist™ now

>>49446 Not like he was a Stalinist, if you've read Homage to Catalonia he basically said the "comrades" the soviets sent over as advisors to the Spanish republicans spent more time shooting Trotskyites and anarchists than shooting at the nationalists. >>49458 >>49742 >Anti-communism can never be grassroots, only a psyop would make people anti-communist You know, /leftypol/ has a bunker I think you'd be much happier at.

>>49766 >>Anti-communism can never be grassroots I never said that. The divide-and-conquer brainrot is hitting you hard...

>>49742 >>49780 Monopoly men are not turning children transsexuals nor are the "statists", it's the parents, teachers, counselors, therapists, and doctors who are doing that of their own choice. And what is the driving force of their decisions? not the "divide-and-conquer brainrot" as you claim, but the tenet that all are free to do as they please.

>>50007 >And what is the driving force of their decisions? not the "divide-and-conquer brainrot" as you claim Not directly, no. It's obvious that the System is feeding bad ideas to those concerned with inequity, and that "progressive" solutions to social issues need questioning. So what happens when you feed progressives the idea that anyone questioning their solutions are just the worst, a "basket of deplorables" who need only be starved of attention (and failing that, perhaps starved in other ways...), all while implanting new "solutions" that only serve to benefit (or, at worst, not hinder) the Elites? And what happens when people see these insane ideas from progressives, but can't see or communicate the nuances of what's going on and who really stands to benefit? Sounds to me like a recipe for a bifurcated populace yapping about nonsense while Babylon continues to bleed the same people dry, fully anaesthetized by accusing their neighbor of somehow being an enemy asset, all under the manufactured consent of pre-determined elections and a Puppet King who taps into whatever part of the zeitgeist benefits the current four-year plan the most. Same as it ever was, same as it ever was... >the tenet that all are free to do as they please Or you get people blaming the human quality of free will itself, that too.

psyop slop. literally watch nothing (animated or otherwise) made after 1990 if not older

>>50641 >literally watch nothing Could've stopped there. The psyop is older than you think...

>>50644 it's a matter of which flavor of psyop you prefer. i prefer it outdated, whether mccarthyist, soviet, quaint 70s counterculture, since it isn't what's constantly being rammed down our throats now. you can "stand outside" of old media a little more, while netflix shit wants to constantly remind you of how you should subvert the present, (through revisionism like this, which will partially erase the original meaning)

>>49354 Will they have Seth Rogen as the pig who dies at the end? Quite fitting for the bolshevik who wants to humanize niggers breaking into cars.

>>49354 < Seth Rogan, Steve Buscemi, Sheldon Did they think that they were making BabeHeart?

>>50145 Alright, my response got deleted (freeze peach, amirite?) so I'm not going to bother writing up another response with images attached again, and instead will present my points in a nutshell: >the "equity" of today is a sham and those promoting it are plunderers robbing from the good to give to the bad, and not just themselves >those who oppose the rot must avoid falling into the same traps that do not challenge anything except their opponents' patience >"free will" is the justification that lets bad people get away with bad things, just so long as it isn't state-sponsored or monopolistic (though that doesn't stop such actions and people from receiving state sponsorship or becoming monopolistic) But what do I know? I just a nobody posting in an irrelevant subforum on an irrelevant webite.