>>56708 >>56710 >>56711 I don't wanna be impolite but these look fucking awful dude

>>56722 I didn’t make them. Some of them look alright, like the one in the shirt and the naked one with the pillow. But yeah, the other ones don’t look so good

>>56724 Some of them look "alright" none of them look "good"

>>56783 This one sticks much closer to the style guide

>>56783 Indeed, so much better

Damn, we've already reached the point where AI has become visual pollution. I just wish those fuckers had the common sense to limit how much they post. Some threads are starting to look awful.

>>58593 Bad news anon, they won't listen to you. They legit think they are a part of a movement that will liberate us from the oppression of greedy artists, and make way for superior machines who can do real art even better. They are making the world a better place, and you are just jealous and coping.

>>58598 Maybe some of them are that delusional, but there has to be a good amount of reasonable people generating this slop, right?

>>58598 The weird part is, they don't even seem to like AI slop, since they post it out of spite when someone calls them out. >They legit think they are a part of a movement that will liberate us from the oppression of greedy artists I remember a schizo thread here months ago saying exactly that. Turns out OP just wanted people to draw free shit to him and got pissy when they told him to fuck off.

You know, there's been a couple of redraws based on AI generated pictures, like some of these >>56243 =, i think that AI drafting aint too bad if you redraw it at hand to add the human element, but seeing the negativity seen in the last few posts, i wanna know....

>>59050 The issue is that AI is flooding out the whole board and dragging down the quality. >some people feel this is their way of doing art It's really not though.

>>59055 I can't disagree with the first part of your post. I've posted a few AI pics here, but tried to be somewhat discerning and not plop out sets within a single post.

>>59050 If they're untalented they can pick up a pencil and develop talent. They will not improve if they refused to make the attempt.

>>58598 Are you like, stupid or something? Liberating us from "greedy artists"? What do you want artists to starve? Do you want people to outsource their creativity to a machine? I was promised a future where machines would do the labor and we could make art, but we got a future where the machines do your creative endeavors and we labor endlessly. What Nonsense. What Horseshit.

>>59236 Don't be a simp, man

>>59241 You ai-slop drones are digging a hole for yourselves, some day your perceptions will be so dulled by the endless consumption of slop even the most obvious ai generated garbage will seem genuine to you. You deserve to live in this hole you're digging, but you're dragging to many people into it with you. Banning ai generated content across the board and relegating it to a /slop/ board might help, but certainly wouldn't be enough.

>>59241 A simp? A simp for what? Humans?

>>59242 I truthfully think they are really just poseurs. They want to be thought of as artists but lack the technical skills and refuse to develop them or accept their limitations, so they use slop to crutch their egos.

>>59242 >Banning ai generated content across the board and relegating it to a /slop/ board might help That sounds like a plan to me.

>>59242 That’s what pisses me off the most. These retards know most people here hate slop, they have a proper space to post it, yet they insist on spreading it everywhere out of spite. Most users who used to post good content have left because really, why bother if any unique image you post will be lost in a sea of generic shit you can find on google images.

>>59251 >Most users who used to post good content have left Yeah I've noticed the engagement here is way down even despite an injection of new anons to the site. Something's just going to have to be done about the AI posting.

>>59244 That's funny. It's like you pretend not to notice that more than 80% of these so called "traditional hand-drawn artists" have drawing skills of a toddler.

>>59914 >b-but most artists are BAD! Yeah that's obvious and has always been the case. The post you're replying to specifically references good art. Did you know that if you can only read the first two sentences in any block of text you're only pretending to be literate?

>>56574 The death of the Link to All was a loss to us all.

>>56709 >>56710 >>56711 AI-gen Penny with boobs? WHY!?

>>59943 >Link to All What is? >>59914 People who use ai have no skills at all. I respect the hell out of someone who sucks but tries since they aren't a posture trying to get attention

>>60253 That was to a Mega.nz archive. Which was nuked ostensibly due to being against their ToS. Iirc Hanzohatori has a Baraag, but the guy wasn't too active there