>>266225
Why is nigger censored in this image? I'm pretty sure I've seen it before uncensored.
>>266227
Is there no better way to communicate this information than a 15 minute long youtube video? I'm also not seeing any links in the description to any sources.
>>266232
"Maximizing Consent" is about avoiding a lawsuit from having PII either contained in the training data or reproducible by the resulting algorithm since that is a violation of a person's right to privacy (so far as such things even exist), what image generators do is so far afield from that to even mention it is more muddying the waters and being pedantic than actually helpful.
We've long since passed the point where participating in this sham of a system is in the best interest of anyone except the "Nobility" running the thing, at this point it is less about commercial viability since the woke crap coming out of most companies now-a-days is commercially unviable without the law coming down on it, it is about protecting existing power structures by reducing disgruntled elements' reach so they don't wind up leading normalfag lemmings away by simply producing something of more intrinsic quality. It is anticompetitve policy-making by entrenched corporate interests who are so bankrupt in the ability to generate anything of actual value some nobody with an algorithm can basically bootstrap their overpaid artists' talents and training onto his own imagination and churn out stuff that people actually want to look at. As they closed off higher learning to the common man so that their own incompetent subordinates would be the only ones left with anything close to the knowledge needed to maintain the ever falling standard of the status quo they are now seeking to smother in the crib the intelligence tools THEY CREATED to prevent anyone from ever being able to make their own anything. All similar efforts that might increase the independence of the populous, such as Right to Repair, are a target to be eliminated.