>>307335
>>307342
>>307347
I wonder if anyone on the production team realized what they were giving birth to.
>>307364
>>307377
>>307380
Here's the original publication:
https://archive.is/PhB5l
And, the original speech:
https://archive.is/4bBjp
Reason I searched for it was to see what the punishment for "failing" to follow this CoC is, and nothing is listed. Just endless muttering about "
We must appeal to our stakeholders". So, at the very most, it's going to be implemented through ESG scoring.
>>307383
>they'd simply make it illegal to have a website which allows comments at all unless they directly control it
Anon, you don't know how control works in Socialist regimes, do you? Let's give you a little bit of a lesson. Under the USSR, and as currently happens in West Taiwan, whenever you do something against the state, you may be surprised to know that such an act is
NOT illegal and they DON'T' arrest you. Surprising, right?
So, how does a Socialist government retain control of the country? Well, whenever you do something "unpatriotic", what happens instead is that you're basically put on a notice list. What this notice list does is that it prevents certain businesses from being able to legally conduct business with you of any sort, prevents people from being able to interact with you without them also being placed on the same list, and certain public services denied to you outright.
But, wait, it gets better! Because of you doing that "unpatriotic" act, you don't only effect your social standing, you also effect the social standings of your family, your friends, your workplace, and any person you passed by on the street. So,
THEY ALSO lose everything like you just did. But, you never, at any point in time, have anything directly happen to you. Instead, what the government does is punish everyone else from interacting with you, in any complicity.
Let's take that back to what's going on here. I should correct myself because this is
already being implemented through ESG. With the way companies work in the normal market, they don't have to worry about whoever they do business with as long as it isn't illegal. However, with this "new market" the UN and WEF is trying to implement, the result is that companies will constantly have to perform background checks on any and all clients, partners, etc.. If they do business with an entity/person who is flagged for having "opposed" some aspect of ESG, the result is that the business will be restricted on whatever type of access they have to any resource (Whether it be supplies on the market or access to their bank account). And, the only way to return having access is perform whatever "ritual" is needed to "prove" that they can have their ESG score returned to it's previous place.
With a system like this in place, there are innumerable actions that are not technically "illegal" as no formal law exists. However, people don't perform said actions because they know the consequences of what happens if they do.