>>390880
>Seems like a fragile industry then, if the sales are mostly from two or three publisher-rightsholders.
Yes. Very fragile. Basically the industry already crashed in the '90s. Everyone figured it couldn't get any lower. But then the SJWs came in and found a way to blast through bedrock and dig straight down into Subterrania.
>The comicsgate website in the first image
I'm not even sure what that is, but it isn't a "comicsgate website" in any sense more than saying that any site by any indie dev who doesn't like the mainstream vidya industry is a "gamergate website." It's silly. Also, though I'm not familiar with this particular site, I know that the guy whose video is in the first thumbnail doesn't want his videos up there. Even though he's basically the creator of comicsgate, he's never really wanted to be part of the weird cliques that formed around it. He just wants to make his Youtube videos and sell his comics. That video in your pic is actually criticizing other comicsgate and adjacent types. Which is silly, and really making him look like a fool lately. That's why I don't think he'd want to be on a website like this. That said, I don't really care so long as they make good comics. And even if they don't, really the best part is just that they're spiting the industry and opening the door for more new guys.
>>390881
More specifically, Warner Bros. bought DC back in the '60s. WB actually almost sold DC to Marvel back in the '80s, but the writer who was going to be tasked with doing the Marvel reboot of Superman, John Byrne, blabbed about it before things were finalized, and bad reaction from some people in the two businesses ended up killing the deal. Byrne still got to reboot Superman, though, just at DC. That book, Man of Steel, is still a classic 40 years later. Luckily for DC, those Batman movies started making tons of money in '89, and they had a lot of success with cartoons, plus that Superman show with Dean Cain, and that all helped to keep DC in general as something Warner would actually want to own. Plus marketing stunts. The Death of Superman was a huge deal, so much so that even normalfags knew about it, and people bought it in droves thinking it would be worth as much as the first appearance of Superman, which was worth a million dollars. Those people didn't understand anything, and once they found out they wasted their money, they all stopped buying comics, because they weren't fans, they were investors. The bubble burst.
When the bubble burst, not only did tons of comic stores go out of business, but Marvel got fucked hard. Due to the bubble, they felt confident enough to expand their business and do their own distribution, which was otherwise outsourced to other companies. When the bubble burst, they realized they had overextended themselves, and they had to declare bankruptcy. They were basically kept afloat by licensing the film rights to many of their properties for cheap. This is how you got the glut of Marvel movies in the 2000s. Or rather, starting from 1998, with Blade. But after X-Men hit at the box-office, all these other studios which had previously bought the rights for cheap all rushed to make their movies. So you finally got Spider-Man and Fantastic Four, which were in development hell for years, not to mention Daredevil, and Hulk, and Ghost Rider. These were the big Marvel characters in the '90s, so they were the ones studios bought. They got the rights for cheap and made insane money.
The reason Marvel studios was able to make The Avengers is because, aside from Hulk, none of the main Avengers were actually popular. No normalfags gave a fuck about Iron Man or Thor, so no studio bought the rights. Daredevil was much more popular, so they bought that instead. Marvel did make a deal to use Hulk, whose rights they did license, but that was it. It's also why they haven't made a solo Hulk movie since Disney bought Marvel. That would involve giving more money to Universal, who still has the license.
And as for that distribution thing, Marvel couldn't distribute their own comics anymore, that failed. The company they used to go with also failed when Marvel ditched them. So Marvel had to go with the same distributors that DC used, Diamond Comics Distributors. This effective gave Diamond a monopoly over the industry. Archie was the only big publisher that wasn't exclusively distributed by Diamond. This gave them the opportunity to ruin the industry. See, when they sold comics at newstands (including those racks at grocery store checkouts. Basically anywhere other than a comic store), unsold copies could be returned for full refunds. But when they sold to comic stores, no refunds. The comic stores had to just sit on the unsold merch and hope it sold later. So Diamond stopped selling Marvel and DC (and Image, and the rest) at newsstands, and only sold them at comic shops. So now normalfags would practically never see a comic (other than Archie). They stopped realizing comics were even still made. Why would you go to a comic store if you weren't already a fan? So new fans just stopped being made.
Archie, meanwhile, still sold at newsstands. Their comics thus sold so much better that they weren't even treated as competition. They were in a league of their own, the only successful comic company. And their comics sucked fucking balls, too. Like Sonic sold gangbusters for them for 25 years, and we on /v/ should be familiar with how fucked Archie Sonic was. But they were sold at places people actually went, so they outsold every Marvel and DC comic by very wide margins.
Also, the Coronavirus lockdowns resulted in DC no longer using Diamond as a distributor, as the entire distribution network was fucked up anyway. But at that point it was far too late for anything, and even the sales numbers that put Marvel into bankruptcy in the '90s look like a golden age compared to current sales numbers of SJW comics.
>tl;dr: a speculation bubble in the '90s lead to comic shops and Marvel both overextending themselves and going bankrupt. Marvel then had to go with the same distribution company as DC, giving that company an effective Monopoly over this sector, and the company then proceeded to fuck over the entire industry by only selling in comic shops, which were now few in number. Terrible long term strategy since no new readers would ever be made, but the company didn't care.
>Then after about 20 years of that, SJWs managed to make things even worse.
>>390909
I do not believe that Vegeta would be able to resist the urge to slap his son through a fucking mountain if he spoke to him like that.