/monarchy/ - monarchy

Past, Present, and Future

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0 (Temporarily Dead).

Ghost Screen
Celebrating its fifth anniversary all September


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

(453.05 KB 519x594 1744970757960c.png)

jean 04/18/2025 (Fri) 21:07:43 No. 7898
it seems to me that the idea of monarchy is this fundamentally fiddley thing. because how can you say that someone's son or their grandson will be as performant as them at ruling? another tricky bit is that it is much more difficult to protect individuals than it is to protect organizations, and so it is difficult to protect individual monarchs. it seems to me that the monarchs do a great deal of unseen service to the public in terms of great ritual and rote learning. it seems to me that monarchs even today bear this great burden of responsibility that is unseen. most people's understanding of monarchs is very tabloidal and driven by the celebrity behavior. still too are peoples ideas of monarchs aligned with the idea of "I don't like my situation so I shall blame who is in charge." it is quite difficult for a commoner to understand the intense differences in the judgments that a monarch and their families would have to make compared to the judgements that a commoner would have to make about their common lives. I am from the great state of Texas and in Texas we consider ourselves equal to the United States in our sovereignty and this is why our flag may be held at the same height as the American flag. and texans tend to be monarchists and traditionalists and believe in fealty and respect towards monarchs and towards world leaders in general. my belief is many true Texans true to the heart and the ethos of the wise among Texans would gladly die in place of allowing a royal on a monarch to die. my query is was monarchy ever achievable and is it more achievable today now that we have this technology which woud make it easier to rule. my thought on it is this: the monarch families have gone through a lot of abuses from their staff and their courts, and many of them likely have deep internalized trama which likely would require medical attention. my belief is that great care should be put forth by the militaries of this earth not only to physically protect those families of world leaders but also to protect them from a much deeper and more insidious threat against them which has come out of some of the secret societies of history. this is the threat of trying to take their sovereignty over their own lives and their personal autonomy away from them. this is a real threat that a commoner often couldn't understand. that a young child would be watched by some staff while the king was busy and that it would be easy for staff to be abusive to a royal. and this isn't spoken about and isn't heard, and I see these big families as rife with abuses that must be addressed if those parties consent for them to be addressed. and I believe it is the duty of the peoples to heal these families of these world leaders and to offer them our love and sympathy and kindness, and forgiveness for the kinds of acts that they may have been forced to Cary out in the name of land or appearances or what have you. I believe the concept of a monarchy could work, especially in our modern times. some wanted George Washington to be a monarch though he refused, and some say trump should be a monarch. perhaps times have changed enough that this sort of thing is viable, with the light of truth shining in on all topics with the aid of computers and with advanced defense networks such as the NSA which could keep a monarch informed minute by minute to the passing events. I will tell you one thing though is that it is kind of like Lord of the flies, and I am not sure that humanity is capable of truly enabling the kind of monarchy to exist that we would want, which is that a true and noble king would reign over us in his court, and that he would be able to secure the throne only for those heirs who had deserved it. I want to say I am very thankful for the leaders of this world for providing me a safe land where I can attain money safely and eat good meals and use the glorious internet. I do apologize for any abuses my ancestors may have made against them and I believe that this planet and our souls will be saved and ultimately that all will be healed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MwCUNgVdjE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJiHDmyhE1A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nVmjMAXtU8
(105.76 KB 914x1024 Go-NUXhXwAAW1cS.webp)

>>7898 Well done for eloquently putting it. Of course concerns over hereditary weaknesses exist. It's been speculated that Prince William shot his love rival to a bloody mess with a shotgun and that the royal palace covered it up. It's up to you to decide whether as two become one flesh, an assault however invited by the wife is an assault upon the self upon which it's justifiable to react with such force, or if these are unkingly/unqueenly ways for royals to behave. I've seen fit to conclude that "Prince William is quietly based". In any case it is my hope that little George is more than the sum of his parts. William will fear the jews ability to oust his guilty consciences to an unfeeling and unforgiving world and so this strategy goes on and on down the line. Get compromising details or information on them, then blackmail them accordingly. The same will happen to little George and to his kin. The idea it's always easy to stir plebescian outrages is true but it's in the job description of a King to effectively handle these things. There's a two-fold threat offered by the rumblings of the plebes. The first threat comes from revolutionary figures appearing to have gained for themselves or even worse the group as a whole, the so-called "mandate of heaven". The way out is for the leaders of the rebellion to die not as martyrs but as a result of their own flaws and their own vices. Mandate of God in so doing leaves them. The second threat comes from either foreign or your own domestic spooks with their drone technology and their bay of pigs psy operations. This one is relatively recent and evolving. It was not quite as easy in the 14th century to get that many bad actors that close to the King and his palace staff. The best answer I have is "go and get yourself a lot of legitimate sons". You can't afford to dwell with paranoia over what might drop out of the sky, or hide from every civic and public engagement. My more eager concerns are how do I get from a parliamentary democracy back to the monarch being in charge of our country? First I might shrink the parliament down from 650, but it does not matter where you shrink it towards. You can say "150 or fewer is ideal", or "90 to 120 is ideal", or "two classrooms' worth is ideal" but it's not the number of them that corrupts the institution so much as the manner of their running. Originally this parliament sat once yearly to decide how the King's tax men were to behave in raising funds against an enemy realm. Looking at the modern state (literally "State" of it now) is appalling. I must know how to get to there again and then I must know ways of addressing it in a plebescian way. Until then I think we are damned. The furthest we can hope for out of our system is maybe a figure like Milei.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply