>>15889 >2D / 3D Barrier (Fictional vs Real) that barrier never existed beyond a self imposed moral obligation to abstain and its easier than ever to demonstrate with ai image generation that forces you to acknowledge that it being fictional doesn't matter. >/loli/ and /delicious/ content is allowed on /b/ (unless the poster is suspect of being a pedo 3DPD shill co-opting it this kind of moral arbitration is why nobody uses /loli/ or /delicious/ either and the go to platform for lolicon is allthefallen with subforums dedicated to talking about being pedophiles. >or the fictional media is related to real media the only people who would even know which fictional media is related to real media are the ones you'd ban for wrongthink because they look at real media. trying to force this retarded ideology onto everyone is a fools errand no matter how you look at it and 8moe's inability to let it go is a large part of why you've been boycotted by everyone and have almost nothing to show for 4chan going down.

>>15890 Right here is a good sample of who to permaban, janny applicants. Notice how mere mention of 2D / 3D (or fictional vs real) barrier brings this anon out in full force.

Global rule #10 >>4721 Pedos were given a chance on 8moe and they blew it. What does Pedo anon expect from 8moe after this incident?

>>15892 8moe blew it by setting up /hebe/ to fail by enforcing a no images rule on an imageboard which made /b/ a better alternative and then nuking it when it predictably failed and was abandoned by the owner because nobody was using it. then 8moe blew it with the community on /b/ by blanket banning the entire demographic of users because they were held to account for someone else breaking the rules instead of just accepting that rule breakers exist and thats why you need moderators in the first place. yet now on /v/ there's a demographic of users from 4chan that brought a bot spammer with them that just today has made 800 posts containing child models in their threads that had to be deleted. their threads are a shit magnet of a greater magnitude than anything this site has ever had to deal with before and yet they put up with it because they feel ideologically aligned with those users. the narrative that we were given a chance here and blew it is an illusion designed to cover for their own blatant favoritism and protect the facade of this being 8chan in anything but name. when 8chan was given the opportunity to take in 4channers en masse it retained them by not playing favorites and affording everyone equal treament regardless of the difficulties that came with providing them a platform. when 8moe was given that opportunity it blew it by playing favorites and only kept a tiny fraction of users that were afforded special treatment based on having the right opinions and interests which still use 4chan for everything outside their general threads anyways.

>>15893 >thats why you need moderators in the first place That's what you pedos taught me. When I was moderating /b/ alone. I was swamped with baby images, CP bots, and pedos didn't behave and bitched when I was most liberal like pic related. Global Rule #10 is justified in thinking pedos wouldn't be reliable to not hazard the site.

>>15894 and your reaction to actually having to do the thing you signed up for is to blanket ban the demographic of users giving you a problem because you don't like them anyway. but if the problematic demographic were horsefuckers you would have no problem putting in the effort to moderate their behavior while still providing them a platform because you like them. that kind of favoritism is something 8chan transcended beyond and why it was able to create a community that rivaled 4chan while 8moe can amount to nothing more than a little clique of delusional weebs that assure each other that they aren't pedophiles for jacking off to naked little anime girls.

I agree with Global Rule #10 after my experience that pedos are too high maintenance to take care of & a hazard to the rest of the site. I'd like to have the original 8chan with all the original boards, but having pedos on clearnet is not viable anymore in this day and age with tighting restrictions for sites like this and I personally don't believe it is really about being a moral arbiter, but plain and simple this site doesn't want to have the risk. To quote Pol Pot: To Keep You Is No Benefit. To Destroy You Is No Loss. >>15895 >and your reaction to actually having to do the thing you signed up for is to blanket ban the demographic of users giving you a problem When you're the only moderator, yes, that is the simplest solution. If there were less restrictions and the global rules didn't penalize BOs for not enforcing global rules, I'd not even bother, and the site itself is in a like situation where if it also doesn't enforce the rules it will also be pulled down. Ultimately, that is what it comes down to here: the simplest solution is the best solution and nobody wants to risk hazarding the whole site for a minority. >but if the problematic demographic were horsefuckers you would have no problem putting in the effort I won't deny I have my biases. (Even if I was far too liberal with pedos rather than permabanning on sight like I am now). Pedophilia is probably the biggest social taboo of them all. So why should the pedo community be considered equal to all the others when they are a far heavier burden to carry and only a small portion of the userbase?

>>15896 you just don't understand the rammifications of destroying entire subsets of your community. the heavier the burden a community has the more they'll contribute to the site as a result of not having the luxury of choice in where they're allowed to post. when you deplatform those communities you don't just get rid of their subject matter but every post they'd ever make about any subject across the entire site. communities that were a heavy burden to platform were the backbone of 8chan that allowed it to have hundreds of thriving boards on various topics where pedos and nazis and all manner of umentionables could come together to discuss things. but when you deplatform all the pedos on /b/ because one of them posted cp or deplatform all the nazis on /pol/ because one of them fedposted about blowing up a federal building all of a sudden you go to talk about something on a completely unrelated board and no one is there to respond.

>>15897 Yes, I'd say it was a tragedy I didn't moderate pedos more heavily from the very beginning. My free-handed moderation lead to pedos getting too cocky and now I have to permaban them all. This video is what Corgi /b/ was like for pedos before the permabans I'm just like the slave master on horseback and y'all were the slaves badmouthing a benevolent master. I'd agree that /pol/ was also a hazard to the site before, but /pol/ is dead now and hardly a worry.

>>15898 equating it to a master slave relationship is why you're the owner of a dead board on a dead site. the fact that some worthless kike weaseled his way into a position that allowed him to kill /pol/ doesn't mean hes now a master over the nazis it just means hes made his own position irrelevant as all the nazis went somewhere else. this power you have is conditional to the consent of your userbase and without it all you're left to lord over is a paranoid schizophrenic rambling about isis.

>>15899 >this power you have is conditional to the consent of your userbase To the consent of my userbase? What about the anti-pedos? I'm sure if I truly had the power to the consent of my userbase, there would be far more liberties for pedos or far less to the encouragement of anti-pedos. >it just means hes made his own position irrelevant as all the nazis went somewhere else. Nah, the /pol/fags weren't going to come here regardless. They kinda fell for the gayops about this place anyways.

>>15900 you don't have the consent of the anti-pedos either because you're pedоs in denial yourselves that are trying to force them to say that you lusting after little girls is actually perfectly normal as long as they have anime eyes.

>>15901 Look, these opinions are my own and don't reflect the rest of the site. You complain of an arbitrary power and arbitrary decision-making. Do you want to know why that is? Because faggots can't agree on anything by that sweet concord of hosts Aristotle praises, and that is why there has to be an arbitrary power. It's just like Hobbes says about the division of lands: >The Children of Israel, were a Commonwealth in the Wilderness; but wanted the commodities of the Earth... which was divided amongst them, not by their own discretion, but by the discretion of Eleazar the Priest, & Joshua their General... which division was therefore Arbitrary. And it needs be arbitrary -- these people wouldn't agree to what extent their property would extend to the other, not without the Sword of an Arbiter -- and the same for the borders of nations, they aren't drawn but by the arbitrary power of the Sword and the fear of their enemies. And it is the very same with you pedos and the lolicon weebs bickering -- in order to have peace, deference must be given to an arbiter. I am that arbiter, and I have decided for the peace of /b/ that pedos need to be permabanned for however long I deem necessarily, and as long as the userbase comes to my /b/ under these conditions they thereby consent to it.

>>15902 theres a reason the lolicon weebs need censorship to enforce their worldview just like the trannies do. their ideology is in direct opposition to observable reality and so they have to create an orwellian alternative reality that everyone is compelled to agree with. this isn't a matter of both sides being just as arbitrary as one another its a matter of one side accepting things for how they actually are and the other side trying to force everyone to believe that things are the way they want them to be.

>>15889 1. not a lot simce im a lazy shit 2. skimmed it, i assume it translates to 'murder all children and those who like them' 3. those arent global RULES but global RULINGS you blind faggot, but also no i aint reading all that shit 4. not much 5. still Bizmark from the last thread you fucking retard, i probably shouldnt bother making a second application but here i am all the same

>>15904 How do I trust you, Bizmark?

>>15905 How do you trust anybody? Would you trust them if they gave you a stellar, perfect reply to every question? That sounds like a sociopath to me.

>>15906 Ok, Bizmark, you're hired. Make me proud.

>>15907 I aspire to mediocrity.

honestly this thread is a good example of why you need to ban pedoshit because it just leads to constant bikeshedding and dogwhistling pedo shit

While I will not apply, as I am already a janny on another board. II would like to say I appreciate OP making cute little drawings and hope it works out. 8/b/ is not the fastest, so I figure you just need people to cover all time zones.

>>15937 >I appreciate OP making cute little drawings I commission them, but np.

Some people think it's like an e-tranny thing and it's a sona or fursona, that might have been true with Alunya, but I look nothing like Grace. It is more of a case of waifuism and being a bit of an avatarfag. I don't want to be my waifu.

I am a guy. I am not wearing the kneesocks. I am not a tranny. I don't want to be a real woman.

>>15944 The more you use it as an avatar, the less i believe you. The less you have her get fucked, the more i think you're a Marielx-tier nearly-irredeemable faggot. For the sake of whatever public appearance you wish to maintain, have that blonde whore take some serious dick.

>>15945 No, She must remain pure and unsullied. For the humorous imagery of her reacting to the insane bullshit on the internet. SFW Image BTW

>>15889 Aside nonces, who has managed to get the ire of jannies? >>15896 Agreed with r10 even over TOR, they can make this site too hot to handle if there was ever an info leak