>>92802 You just sounded like you were projecting very hard, nothing more. On a side note i've hear so much shit about "midwit" this and that lately, i already have midwit fatigue-fatigue

>>92805 I can't imagine why. You seem like a perfectly non-room temperature IQ individual who's clearly capable of reading a post Id and all that.

>>92780 >Literally just talking amongst themselves >YOU WERE MOLESTED AS A CHILD AND NOW WANT TO DO THE SAME TO OTHERS The fuck?

>>92813 Oh i didn't see lol. In my defence i never claimed i wasn't retarded, but calling someone a midwit redditor while you act like you're a 130+ IQ mastermind on a fetish board of all places is the pot calling the kettle black.

>>92836 >have the most obvious and easy to figure out shit imaginable pointed out to you >"you act like you're a 130+ IQ mastermind"

>>92837 Calling someone a midwit implies you think you're above the average inteliigence.

>>92830 Nobody's buying that there isn't a link between faggotry and pedophilia anymore. Gay "icon" Harry Hay (a fag and a communist) openly endorsed relationships between adult men and young boys. Or listen for yourself: https://www.bitchute.com/video/iKo5nOdAbzyS/ (starts at 6:22) >>92800 You know it's possible to have these intrusive thoughts without acting on them right?

Some of those boys are just downright🍇able

>>92841 What the fuck are you on about lmao The point was how insane it was to start talking about that shit out of absolutely nowhere and the fact that your response to that being pointed it is to dig the hole even further is fucking hilarious

>>92847 Nothing is "insane" about pointing out the well documented links between homosexuality and pedophilia, and your sorry gaslighting attempt is only proving me right. 0/10 leave the pilpul for your rabbi next time.

>>92846 >Conservative calls gays pedophiles >Immediately posts shota and fetish posts about them Wow, you really proved him wrong, anon. Way to go.

>>92851 The insane thing is bringing that shit up out of absolutely fucking nowhere you fucking idiot. Meds. Now.

My favorite part of this board will always the fags getting more offended over being called a pedophile than the literal lolicons

>>92880 >multiple examples in this very thread of fags gooning over pre adolecent boys >"TAKE MEDS SCHIZO" You just don't know when to quit huh. When you lie you speak your native tongue.

>>92946 Completely right about this. The excuse of "it's a drawing" was always a weak one. Like, if you're not a pedo or don't have those tendencies, then what about those drawings are you attracted to?

>>93085 This, 1000% however there's an issue: as long as the admin team here allows pedos to congregate here and post their smut, then it's going to be an endless back and forth with the occasional honeypots sprinkled in for good measure. The only way this stops is if the board admins actually decide to do something about it and that's assuming they're not into pedo shit themselves.

>>93085 Some fags are still trying to use the "well I'm asexual so my interest in (very obvious) fetish material isn't a sexual one (there is no other artistic or cultural merit to the content)" which is of course about as believable as claiming to watch porn for the plot/acting. >>93087 Strictly speaking it's better that they stay in their goon caves whacking it to the fictional stuff than actually grooming mīnọrs. But that's a tired argument as well and none of it should be "encouraged."

>>93122 Acefags are the absolute most hilarious group of retards here. It's hilarious how deeply in denial they are. Especially when they're so obviously getting off to it. You'd think the woke era would've made them abandon all sense of shame but clearly there's still some form of delusion at play...or virtue signalling that too. And, begrudgingly, I agree. While lots them are far too pussy to actually go and do anything but it's still a tired argument that shouldn't be encouraged. Nonetheless, my argument stands about the only way things could ever change around here.

>>93150 The biggest problem with these people is that they mistake being fetishists for being asexual. There are a ton of people who can't get off at all without their specific kink being satisfied, in this case tickling, and these fake asexuals are in denial about it. Doesn't help that there's a fuckton of pseudoscientific bullshit floating around about sexual behaviour at the moment.

Now I'm even more confused and hope some anons can answer it. I've read through people's profiles, comments, etc on FetLife, reddit and TMF. What baffles me is some people will admit to seeking tickle play outside of their relationship but also say they're not in a open relationship/cuck/poly etc. I assumed that if you played outside your relationship then it's open in some way. (Especially since tickling is sexual and a turn on for these people) So even if you're okay your wife/girlfriend meeting with other guys for tickle sessions it's still considered a closed relationship as long as sex isn't involved?

>>93151 This. The psuedoscientific mental gymnastics that gender ideology people have leapt and bound to get through as an excuse to get off in public has absolutely scrambled the mind of the average fetishtard. >>93154 I'll simplify that one for you: these people are retarded. They don't comprehend that ANY fetish being partaken in by a third party is still sexual on some level and even if she's not cumming from it, he certainly is. It's just another example of the absolute mental gymnastics at play here to justify being a degenerate. But even then, most people, including myself don't really give two shits if someone's a cuck or a degen or not...we just despise the mental gymnastics they use and how they act like their problem is a solution and then act smug about it, like how some retards think that posting feet pics online puts them above the rest of us.

>>93161 It's not even just "gender ideology people", there's even more bullshit coming from the right than the left these days. If you look at any scientific study in the past ten or so years that claims porn is harmful then there's a very decent chance it's going to have come from somebody who claims to be a feminist but is actually an evangelical Christian.

>>93162 >It's both sides >Evangelical Christian LARPing as a feminist Aye, you've got me there. I've seen that happen too. Point is, brainrot is bad and I've lost patience for asexuals specifically because of how deep in denial they are. Even if they're just one small part of a much bigger issue.

>>93154 There's a lot of facets to this behavior. Chiefly, unlike a lot of fetishes, tickling is uncomfortable for most people. Those in serious, vanilla relationships who later want to indulge in this fetish inherently do not have a great chance at convincing their partner to participate. It doesn't really blip on the radar for most people that something so childish could even be considered a form of outercourse, even though it's patently obvious to us. So, rather than indulge their partner or deny them and risk separation, they both pretend that it's the silly, annoying game that it's normally viewed as. Is it dishonest? Certainly. Is it wrong? Eh. My opinion is that most people aren't mature enough for a devoted relationship, let alone a polyamorous one. That said, courtship and marriage are conventions anyways. The only genuine reason to get legally married is to financially partner yourself to another person.

Can the mod team or someone please get rid of all these threads that encourage making tickle art of real people/real people’s personal ocs. I’ve always hated these threads and I think the fact they’re still around is gross. I’m all for dEgEnErAcY or whatever freaks like to use as a scapegoat, but when it crosses the line into effecting real people I can’t just ignore that. I know this is gonna be unpopular here but I’m praying at least one person on the mod team has a shred of common sense. Just completely nuke these threads, everyone would be better off if you did. Think about it

>>93169 Immoral behavior on my anonymous porn board? No way! This should be taken down! No really if this shit disturbs and disgusts you, this is not the place for you and you should probably stick to Instagram and Facebook. Reddit still might be a bit much for you "I'm all for DEGENERACY" dude no you fucking aren't, your definition of "degeneracy" is probably joking about 9/11 and liking feet

>>93169 Those threads have been here for over a year, probably more, I really don't think anyone cares let alone the mod team. This is a 8chan tickling board, about everything goes unless its illegal material. You're wasting your time and making yourself look like an ass complaining about things most people here don't care about cause it's good jack off material. The rule of thumb is you look at the material on this site, you post the material, request for people who have the material to post it, and if you have any talent you create the material. That is all. Moralfagging accomplishes nothing.

>>93170 >>93171 >”I’ve grown so accustomed to the culture that surrounds me that it doesn’t upset me at all when tickle porn is produced and distributed of real girls (not fellow fetishists, not porn actresses, just regular girls who have real lives, moms, dads, siblings, friends, jobs, anxieties, hopes, dreams and boundaries) without their knowledge or consent. In fact, I see these girls as nothing more than material to be fapped to and forgotten, regardless of how they would feel about it if they knew their autonomy had been so disgustingly disregarded and their boundaries crossed.” Yeah okay so just say you’re gross then, stop trying to justify something that’s obviously abhorrent

>>93173 I agree that making fetish art of real people is disgusting, but if you don't like it just hide it and move on like me.

>>93173 OH MY GOD SOMEBODY MADE PORN OF MY LITERAL OC YOU'RE DISGUSTING SEXIST RACIST HOMOPHOBIC Shut up, nigger. You're on fucking 8Chan. Yes, people are going to go on to your gay fursona. We're not fucking sub tweeting you with it or emailing your mom pictures of it, stop whining. You put your shit online? Rule 34. Now GTFO my board, normalfag.

>>93176 Yeah that's kind of my point. They're certain threads I find depraved (For example it's very sick and weird to request fetish art of unconsenting people you know in real life) but I'm not gonna fight a losing battle and demand them removed. If a thread is up for longer than 72 hours or so, the community at large is fine with it, and most the people who dislike it know to mind there own buisness. What's gonna happen if you don't is you're gonna be made fun of, called slurs, and what you want done will not be done. That is not me stating my opinion on the concerns you're raising, it's just how it is. Moralfagging is a waste of time and energy. If you don't like the thread don't go to the thread, if you don't like that the board hosts the thread find another place to get your kicks. They are plenty of other places on the internet where your opinions are the popular ones, don't go fighting for change in the places where they aren't.

>>93173 Lurk moar newfag.

>>93169 >Ignores the low-hanging fruit of the multiple incest threads, where people literally post pics of their own family members they want to indulge in fetish-related activities with >Instead tries to cite porn of gooner bait e-celeb avatars as one of the most egregious examples of the "problem" Blatant self report

>>93180 Obviously the worse shit on this board is worse, I’ve seen people actually speak out about that stuff. But I’ve seen next to nobody talk about this and it pisses me off. Also no, avatars that depict just regular ass girls (or just straight up regular ass girls, not avatars) does not qualify as “gooner bait” you’re just a creep who can’t see any woman without getting horny.

>>93181 >But I’ve seen next to nobody talk about this Objectively untrue, people bitch about the other stuff all the time. So you're either new here or Freudian slipping really hard.

Moralfaggotry off the charts lmao. Don't post your content if you don't want it lewded, simple as. Remind me to compile a list of the cuntoids who dOnT cOnSeNt to their "likeness" used for porn and commission entire rape/snuff series of same