>>43370 I think it seems pretty genuine. the way she jolts and gets all ancy when she gets stripped slowly seems pretty hard to fake, at least imo A lot of tickle porn is faked (from what ive seen) by more uppity studios just looking to make a quick buck, reusing models with mid feet and mixed reactions. Amateur videos seem more genuine and by people who actually have fun with it, and she definitely looks like she's having fun

>>43370 I'm with you OP. It seems to me most tickling content is faked, or exaggerated. Viewing this however, I think it's genuine. She's too bashful. In fake vids, they're immediately going nuts. As someone with IRL tickle experience, it's progressive. Also- thanks. Best film I've seen in a long while.

Wager a guess on this one, knowledgeable anons? I really want to believe, because super intense armpit tickling is pretty much my exactly my ticket, and her armpits look so fucking hot in this, it's incredible. But she goes so fucking nuts, it's almost impossible for me to genuinely believe it. Like I've never seen ANYONE do an unironic ahegao irl. Not only that, but she's Angelina who's a well established model, which, you know, brings up the common question: would someone really subject themselves regularly to this kinda thing if it really drove them insane like this? It's incredibly doubtful to say the least. BUT! At the same time, she goes so crazy on it and for so long, it actually comes back around for me and I really do wonder if a fucking fetish model can pull off this kinda thing, or if she would even be sufficiently motivated to do so. I mean hamming it up doesn't make it justice. Like there's no ego, you know? No effort to remain attractive or to act like a super hot model or whatever. By the end, when she's fucking drenched in sweat, and her hair is all matted and messed up, and her voice is all hoarse and she's screaming gibberish, she looks like a genuine crazy person, or someone that's been put through something. Idk man, and to be fair I don't really care, I'm mostly just curious, it's brought me so many nuts already I can't seriously hold it against her or the studio, and even if it was fake, it's still pretty much my perfect fantasy of ridiculously ticklish armpits and over the top tickle torture. https://spankbang.com/7mup4/video/angelina+s+insanely+ticklish+armpits

Honestly one thing I hate about tickle videos made by people who are fetishists is that they’ll act a lot. They’ll say cringe shit, overreact, tickle weirdly, etc. That being said I think this girl is ticklish but that doesn’t rule out the fact that she is overreacting for the video, because anyone on Onlyfans is almost guaranteed to try to sell their reactions harder. I could not fap to it. It’s the same kinda cringe band/theater kids let off

>>43594 Which video would you referring to, good sir? The one op sent or the one right above yours

DMCA'd, fuck y'all.

>>43370 I've always had the same sentiment towards the concept that porn (tickling focused or otherwise) is fake/acting/exaggerated: My dick can't tell the difference, so it doesn't matter.

The fake real debates crack me the fuck up. Everyone reacts different. There's no standardized manner to determine if the reactions are real or not. Tickling is a random assault on the nerves, an attack on the same exact spot can produce different reactions every time. You'll never know for sure if something is fake or not. Just listen to your ugly parts and fap accordingly. Lest you find yourself becoming The Tickle Champion on YouTube, incorrigibly educating the masses when a tickle is real or fake.