>>470 There's no way to enforce it anyway.

>>471 I may have a solution.

>>472 kek

>>470 >I always assumed it was mandatory. Silly me. It explains a lot, doesn't it? why would anyone think it was mandatory?' Do you know how many movies are released every year in cineams in america It simply not possible to wathc that many movies in a year

>>595 Every film from the shortlisted nominees, not every single film made that year

>>470 >they didn't have to watch what they were voting for Explains a lot.

>>595 >t.

>>595 Ok but the nominees have specific criteria in order to be nominees. They aren't just going to add John Chode's latest freshman year home movie.

>>602 This is why Disney always won every year until recently. None of the judges or Oscars people considered animation to be anything but baby shit for kids. There were even articles from like 10 or 15 years ago that the judges would just ask their kids which one they liked more and that was their vote. It's why something like the Iron Giant, though receiving multiple best picture awards and nominations, never showed up in the big Hollywood contests.

>being forced to endure the D. I. E. schlock you're blindly ticking diversity boxes for Suffer.