damn i thoght my vore fetish was the second worst shit u can get into after u know what thanks for answering man

>>63032 is the person that made that post retarded? Like seriously, first of all, WHY WOULD YOU COME OUT ABOUT YOUR FETISHES TO YOUR FAMILY, and second of all, WAS IT NECESSARY FOR HIM TO BE SO FUCKING SPECIFIC? "ANAL VORE". IF I HAD A SON AND HE SAID THAT TO ME I WOULD FUCKING DISOWN HIM

>>63057 Don't disown him. You're just perpetuating a cycle where people can't be open and honest about what they're feeling. Instead, be like "oh, that's fine then" and then move on with life. Turn into something that people can just say and it's not a big fucking deal. It's because people are ashamed and feel like it's a big fucking deal that we end up with stories like this.

>>63057 >Like seriously, first of all, WHY WOULD YOU COME OUT ABOUT YOUR FETISHES TO YOUR FAMILY Because then you cannot be your "true whole self" since you're controlling how you act out your sexual urges. And that's a "bad thing" because it's evidence that society is "wrong" and needs to be remade to be more "accepting". You're not witnessing anything new as these autists have always existed. The only difference is that it was previously hidden behind hundreds of paragraphs of pseudo-intellectual nonsense two centuries ago: https://infogalactic.com/info/Discourse_on_Inequality >>63058 >It's because people are ashamed and feel like it's a big fucking deal that we end up with stories like this. No, it's not. Reread the screencap. The autist made it a big deal all on his own because he tied his IDENTITY' (His very existence) to anal vore. THAT'S where the problem stems. No one really gives a shit what specific orientation of squiggles on a sheet of paper gives a person a stiffy. The problem becomes that's your only personality trait and you don't ever shut the fuck up about it. THAT'S the reason why the internet hates furfags. THAT'S the reason why /pol/ stopped being fun. THAT'S the reason why "boys clubs" hate women ever getting involved. And THAT'S the reason why everyone hates anything claiming to be "LGBT". Because that's your ENTIRE existence, you're going to make sure that everyone knows about it, and anyone who complains needs to be removed because they're the person causing the "real" problems.

>>62987 I definitely felt a little sick when someone on here told me that for the first time. But luckily I don't think I've ever actually nutted to a Paramouth video.

>>63032 This has to be a joke right?

>>63066 I'm >>63058 , and I'm not reading a schizo post from someone who clearly has jumped the shark.

>>63070 >I'm not reading a schizo post Yet you're going to argue that "society" is the problem?

>>63071 > durhur read my schizo post No.

>>63068 Almost certainly, but you can never be sure...

>>63058 Last time i checked, when we broke that "cycle where people can't be open and honest about what they're feeling" homosexuals and trannies started to feel the freedom to molest children and try to force them to mutilate their genitals, with furries also feeling the freedom to be able to fuck animals without their consent [ANIMALS CAN'T CONSENT, THAT'S A BIOLOGICAL FACT.]. And countless other horrors trying to be normalised around the globe. We have gotten to a point that you can be open about liking fucking VORE and rub it all in the faces of normal peole and THEY'll have to tolerate it because if they don't the liberfags will cry that they're being fascist. This is going to be probably the most unpopular opinion on this forum, but bullying was what made people think twice before saying they liked children, liked animals, were gay, had a mental illness and thought they were a gender they really weren't, you get it. Bullying made people repress their fucked up thoughts and forced them to act like civilized human beings who actually contributed something to society, and if you were too fragile you would just kill yourself and make society stronger. The point is that i'm trying to make is that it's NOT ok to be into vore and you should be fucking ashamed of it, but not just vore, any other fetish/kink is also in that list. Are you in the bed with a consenting partner? You can do whatever the fuck you want as long as it doesn't hurt you or them (optional) Are you in a public discord server full of normal people, in the street walking by, in the work, on a random forum about videogames, or any other public place you can imagine? DON'T TALK ABOUT YOUR FUCKING FETISHES AND STAY ON TOPIC, WE DO NOT WANT TO HEAR ABOUT HOW YOU WOULD LOVE TO BE EATEN ALIVE/EAT SOMEONE/SOMETHING ALIVE.

>>63118 get some help.

>>63118 > Here's another schizpost then, read it! No.

>>63141 >>63148 >>63072 >>63070 Imagine coming to a discussion thread just to try and shut it down when you don't like the responses your getting! If you don't want to engage, then leave faggots

>>63153 > read the schizoposts or else I'll cry No.

>>63118 >ANIMALS CAN'T CONSENT, THAT'S A BIOLOGICAL FACT Our friends over on >>>/zoo/ would disagree with you. >And countless other horrors trying to be normalised around the globe. Actually, no, it's the reverse. Many of these "horrors" have always existed in human societies since the dawn of time. However religion, civilization, and progress tended to result in those "horrors" being extremely discouraged if not outlawed because it was seen as causing social distrust or indications of one being no better than an animal. Even in societies that were outright sexual degenerates like the Romans and the Japanese, they still adhered to the decency of keeping those activities behind closed doors. >>63141 >>63148 >>63154 Like OMG, why are ya-all so triggered just because people say stuff you don't like? :^)

>>63154 If you don't like my post then you are free to just ignore it and get the fuck out of here, you can also mute this thread so it doesn't hurt your feelings (optional) I'm the guy that posted the "schizopost" and also created this thread, you on the other hand, WOW, we can see your tears rolling down your cheeks, also your faggotry was so forseeable that fucking ChatGPT predicted you.

>>63032 my man u messed up rly bad like i would admit murder and wont say i have a vore fetish its just a rule for me and i advise u to go by it after u change ur name and live else where unless i got a million bucks to spare so maybe ill tell the bitch ill get from the other half of the planet right before i kill her after i cum sry for my dark jokes and rly its not the end of the world i messed up too before i hope u take the jokes from a fello vore guy like if we were brothers (tho u wont be ever my brother cuz if u were i would have killed u) but rly bro u messed up dont do that again dont be soft and never think about that comming out party again thats a gay consept just open anal vore for 5 mins wank and move on go to the gym or learn an instrument or something its just sex ur family shouldnt be involved about that and surely its not fair to ask them to support u thro ur degenracy manup and be degenrate on your own leave them out of it get ur self assurance from ur own self thats what having a dick dictates

>>63156 >Our friends over on >>>/zoo/ would disagree with you. "our" friends? What do you mean with "our" firends? You mean mentally fucked up people that try giving the world the worst shitty fucking arguments for raping animals? Here's some REAL evidence so you get a little educated :3 REASONS WHY ANIMALS CAN'T CONSENT: 1- Lack of Language: Animals cannot use human language to verbally communicate agreement or refusal in a clear, mutually understood manner. 2- Limited Cognitive Capacity: Animals do not have the complex reasoning abilities required to fully understand actions, consequences, or the concept of consent itself. 3- Instinct-Driven Behavior: Their actions are primarily guided by instincts and conditioned responses rather than deliberate, informed choices. 4- Inability to Understand Human Contexts: Animals cannot comprehend human social, cultural, or situational nuances that influence consent. 5- Non-Shared Decision-Making Framework: There is no mutual framework between humans and animals for making informed decisions about interactions. 6- Physical Signals Are Ambiguous: While animals can exhibit behaviors that humans might interpret as positive or negative, these signals are not intentionally communicated as consent or refusal. Sources: Marc Bekoff, (2007). The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy — and Why They Matter. Bekoff explores animal cognition and ethics, highlighting their emotional capacities but not consent as humans understand it. Francione, G. L. (2008). Animals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation. Discusses the limits of animal autonomy and the implications of human interaction. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2005). Ethics of Science and Technology: Explorations of the Frontiers of Science and Ethics. Analyzes ethics around non-human beings and consent frameworks.

>>63157 > I'll post another schizopost, they'll definitely read that No.

>>63161 >What do you mean with "our" firends? If 8moe was an apartment building, they're just five doors down. >Animals cannot use human language Why does the language matter? If that's the justification, then one can argue that anyone who doesn't speak your own native language is not "human", which has been the precedent in some past societies dating back millennia. That's even where we get the word "Barbarian" from. >Animals do not have the complex reasoning abilities required to fully understand actions, consequences, or the concept of consent itself. What is the standard and the proof for this? >Their actions are primarily guided by instincts and conditioned responses rather than deliberate, informed choices. The same can be said for humans. In fact, that's been Socialism's biggest argument since it existed in it's proto-form with Rousseau and his theory of "The social contract". >Animals cannot comprehend human social, cultural, or situational nuances that influence consent. The same can be said for people who travel between something as small as a state. Hell, Canada has the same heritage and is a neighbor of the U.S., yet there are many aspects of their society, culture, and situational nuances are absolutely alien to those of us living in America. >There is no mutual framework between humans and animals for making informed decisions about interactions. Again, what is the standard and the proof for this? >While animals can exhibit behaviors that humans might interpret as positive or negative, these signals are not intentionally communicated as consent or refusal. The same can be said for women, you know. To be quite blunt, all of your points rely upon fallacious arguments that have been used and rejected by people for the past 500 years when it comes to the different human races intermingling with each other.

>>63165 >If 8moe was an apartment building, they're just five doors down. Still doesn't make them your friends. The just "live" in the same building. >Why does the language matter? So both parties know they are consenting to each other. Communication is important

>>63171 >Communication is important There's other methods of communication other than language. If an animal is backing you into a corner and humping you, it's pretty clear what the animal wants. Not to mention that we know why animals act the way they do.

>>63172 Yes there is other forms of communication but that doesn't answer the question about the animal giving consent to your sexual acts. I can only think of 1 scenario in which the animal is consenting to it.

Jesus, we got a sweaty schizo posting about trans people arguing with a dude that wants to raw dog his labrador

>>63164 Cope.

>>63316 And you are still here reading said "schizopost" while also complaining and saying you're not reading it lmao

>>63171 He wants to fuck animals but also knows it's morally AND legally bad, so he forces himself to think animals can consent, there is no rational way of changing his mind.

>>63766 >>63769 literally you're this picture now, goddamn troll better or don't troll at all

>>63827 >Posting soyjack

I have no problem with people reposting other peoples content under two stipulations: 1. They credit the original artist. 2. They do not try to pass off someone else's work as their own. For example vore.writer on Instagram writes stories to accompany pictures. At first they credited the original artist then at some point they decided that the images they found were their own and stopped crediting trying to pretend they made the art.

>>64133 Oh yeah that guy. What's crazy is I have asked them before to credit the orginial artist and they just straight up blocked me. Something not quite right about them

>>63827 That's some insane projection right there

The fact that any of you fags, read, post, or even come to this website shows that you have a fucked up mentality.