/tkr/ - Tickling Refuge

Kocho Kocho

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

US Election Thread

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

BACKUP URLS TO BOOKMARK If the board goes down, try 8chan.se/tkr Second fallback, https://8chan.redchannit.xyz/ If all else fails, we have to move back to 8kun.top/tkr/

(126.39 KB 894x894 AI garbage.jpg)

AI Scourge Anonymous 01/04/2024 (Thu) 01:50:26 Id: 7c4816 No. 59835
AI have become a fucking scourge in the tickling art space. I am so sick of trying to browse deviantart, pixiv, another spaces to see hundreds and hundreds of spewn out AI generated garbage. It looks like shit, it is completely devoid of any soul, the anatomy is all fucked up, the bondage and actual tickling is nonsensical (seriously, half of it is someone's feet sticking out while everyone just laughs not touching them). It is all terrible and anything AI generated needs to be banned from everywhere. Celebrity fakes look better than this AI bile. Look at this garbage tell me you want to fap to it
>>59835 ...and you want us to do something about it? There's always going to be spam. Hell you don't even need AI to do that. At least someone drew parts of it at some point.
(108.69 KB 894x894 ai shit 3.jpg)

(111.75 KB 894x894 ai shit 1.jpg)

(102.77 KB 894x894 ai shit 5.jpg)

(145.88 KB 894x894 ai shit 2.jpg)

(134.31 KB 894x894 ai shit 4.jpg)

>>59836 I am drawing attention to it at least. The danger is in the sheer volume and everyone of these images looks horrible.
>>59837 You really don't have to draw attention to something as blatantly obnoxious as this, we know.
So what? 90% of tickling content is just footfag garbage made for brainrotted virgins. Makes sense they’d find this ai trash hot as well.
(104.71 KB 512x640 tentacle1ai.jpg)

(115.30 KB 512x640 tentacle2ai.jpg)

Setting aside the debate over AI vs human created art, I find the level of garbage AI art has more to do with the user's lack of imagination than the AI engine. Here are a couple I've done toying around with an AI engine. Not great, but not garbage.
(533.05 KB 512x640 aishit.png)

(442.95 KB 512x640 aishit2.png)

>>59851 Hate to break it to you, anon, but these too are shit. All AI art as of right now needs to edited at least 10% to took okay. Don't let the of the novelty of it getting human genitalia right blind you to the fact that these, despite having all the elements of a good piece of tickle are, are shit too. That pale glossy sheen the AI puts on everything is disgusting. At least use some kind of a filter for Lila's sake. These took me 5000 hours using VLC. They are not by any means perfect, but at least they don't make me get a headache when I look at them
>>59857 That's you're opinion. Mine is that you went too far on the color saturation, which actually made them worse. I do agree that it's a novelty, but that is quickly changing.
>>59851 What ai did you use for those?
>>59905 SexyAI...Lots of engine's, but I prefer Babe engine or Yiff engine. With Yiff you need to specify human, otherwise you'll get a furry..
>>59857 >I have to slightly edit the coloration to avoid getting a headache >This takes it from unacceptable shit-tier to suddenly good And into the trash it goes. >>59835 >It looks like shit, >the anatomy is all fucked up, >the bondage and actual tickling is nonsensical All true of plenty of actual artists as well, but here is your real point: >it is completely devoid of any soul, Butthurt artist detected. If you're so scared of AI image factories putting your Patreon out of business, maybe you should make your shit unique. Several of the top circlejerked artists in this community just copypaste faces, anatomy, and bondage setups from one work to the next, only changing minor details like hair, clothes, or background to suddenly make it a different character. The one and only artist that works for is the guy that advertises "35,000+ variants" or whatever for every image, knowing full well that no matter what he does, there will always be autists that whine about "durr no ballgag?" or "shouldve been in nylons". tl;dr Seriously OP, get checked for autism. This whole attitude where everything needs to be exactly perfect according to your personal standards before you ever let anyone know them is probably making you miserable in other areas of your life, right? There are professionals who specialize in helping people like you cope with the world around you.
>>59926 or maybe he's just sick of seeing bullshit AI generated slop? It would be one thing if you had to see it every now and then, but it's fucking overwhelming at this point. It's like when Rajee was posting 20 dumbass crayon drawings everyday, but now it's fueled by the power of AI driven by mindless tickle autists, so it's been multiplied 100x.
>>59926 I am an artist and I suffer from same face syndrome. I do exactly what this poster claims artists do. Trying to learn how to so more dynamic stuff but it’s hard between my own irl life. Among other moral reasons it’s why I’ll never make a patreon. I fully support AI generated shit because it’s something I can learn from and reference. Can’t reveal these opinions publically though because there would be so much seethe.
Not gonna fault anyone for what they fap to but yeahh I don't get this stuff at all. It's on the same level as fakes. Maybe AI will fool me someday but I can't not see the underlying building blocks and they all look the same to me. It's like the text AI where I'll get a spark of a charge followed by this sense of empty calories. For personal use I'm also not into anything, person or computer just giving me what I want. It's like a mental self tickle, it doesn't work for me. I need that element of randomness. The laughably bad ones are great though, I always enjoy seeing trainwrecks of art being presented as something hot.
>>59972 >Rajee Jesus there’s an old name. Dude is like the OP autistic tickle “artist” and I say that in the quotiest of air quotes. Been doing this crap for a good 20 years now and it still looks like he took a diarrhea dump on a tablet. Honestly it’s almost inspiring in a fucked up way that he’s still at it despite having never improved.
>>59835 These sites unironically need to add some kind of limit to how many pictures you can upload in a day. The problem is the autists who use AI to make pics feel the need to upload all 300 attempts they did when trying to make a specific picture instead of just putting up the 1 or 2 that ended up looking decent.
>>59835 >I am so sick of trying to browse deviantart, pixiv, another spaces to see hundreds and hundreds of spewn out AI generated garbage. Pixiv I get it, but DA? DA was full of garbage before AI, like shit would look like a 3 y.o. drawing. You always had to scroll a lot to get to the good stuff. That and terribly fakes. Like, why would it be better a photoshopped work of shit compared to the first of last one that you posted here: >>59837 We had horny people who wasn't able to draw before, posting their shit, and now it's the same, just that AI, with the hope AI will improve over time. But anon here is on point: >>60049 Problem is not the "quality" of the work, but the quantity, I think
>>60048 use to drive me fucking crazy that people would encourage him on the old forums. I fucking hate that guy
>>59835 100% agree, I keep blocking artists on DA now who spam AI but the fuckers keep coming. Why is it so hard to only submit the best of 20 pics you made? We don't need all of them. I've already messaged DA to limit the spread.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply