>>332816 Everyone is still around, just not around here. Which is kinda sad. /v/ is still active, and KiA is big enough that a mild schism resulted in the creation of a new hub with 7000 subscribers at r/KotakuinAction2. Apart from /v/ it seems the imageboard front either went full /pol/ or left to social media and other places. I still encounter butthurt over our 2016 war with the IRC trolls from time to time, so people remember us. An absolutely shitload of #GG supporters found their way to The_Donald as Trump supporters too. Its pretty mindblowing.

Ah, the real GG board. Not that one on 8cucked.moe

Part 3: The War Rages On (And How You Can Help) Since its inception, people have joined #GamerGate for many reasons. Some want to see the gaming industry exempted from the modern culture of "politicize everything" and have it remain, as it has been for decades, a space where people from all walks of life can relax and have fun. Others care about gaming due to its effects on the larger media world, and oppose the shared political bias that #GamerGate uncovered in the mainstream games media. Still more simply want the games media, and all media, to behave in an ethical way and not attack their audience to cover up their own conflicts of interest. And more yet are angry at the behavior of the games media, especially about the way they have lied about gamers and slandered our culture like high school bullies. For all of these people and many more, #GamerGate became a way to fight back. #GamerGate exists today because people like you help us: 1: Spread The Word Talk about gaming and gamer culture in your spaces, and defend it against the smears and lies. Gamers are not "sexist" or "racist" and no amount of normal chat-lobby trash talk has ever made them so. A smear unchallenged will eventually be accepted as truth, and the cycle has to be broken. When you see and hear these accusations, demand proof. Never just listen and believe, and encourage others not to either. 2: Be An Informed Consumer Learn about the games media and why they are so reviled today. Know that every click you give to a link from a site like Kotaku or Polygon puts money into their pocket and rewards them for their horrible behavior. Use an archiving site like http://archive.is to show their content to others without giving them revenue, and become acquainted with the names and social media accounts of the personalities of these sites who write their articles. Learn the real personalities behind big names like Bob Chipman, Ben Kuchera, Tim Schafer, and Leigh Alexander. You may not like what you see.

Frequently Asked Questions >Who is the girl with the red hair and green and purple hoodie? That's Vivian James, #GG's beloved mascot. She was given to us by a feminist game developer project. We raised over $70,000 dollars to help women make videogames, because the games media refused to promote their project out of friendship with their competitors. As a reward, they let us create a character for their game, and so Viv was born. >What are "SJWs" and why do you guys hate them? SJW stands for "Social Justice Warrior." We first met these people a month after #GamerGate started, when the media was slandering us up, down, and sideways. They're the sort of folks who want to gripe about politics at Christmas dinner with the family, and seem to absolutely hate fun and free speech in all their forms. We hate them because they hated us first, and because they came riding to the defense of the games media in droves when we just wanted them to be ethical. Since then many of them have cozied up to the games media itself, even as far as taking over translation studios for Japanese games. If you meet someone with blue hair who calls themselves a feminist and really hates gamers, you've probably met an SJW. They're obnoxious, suck the fun out of the gaming community, and rarely even play games themselves leading many people to want them gone. >Did you guys really elect Trump and spawn the alt-Right? You heard that from the media, didn't you? I'm pretty sure they would blame us for Lucifer's fall from Heaven if they thought anyone would believe them. The answer is no, probably not. Although you will find quite a few #GG supporters who support Trump specifically because he calls out the media when they lie.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/140051/israel-policy-forum-network-intrigue-moshe-dann https://archive.is/iFjv9

https://ipfs.io/ipns/dynode.io/#!a/2.md Offering this as this thread helped with some of the ties I was drawing in the article. Thanks anons.

second leader

Look at what I've got. These images about Drmies' administrative CheckUser action shows that there's a Trumpian sentiment. It proves that BatteryIncluded and Koncorde, as well as the Wikipedia community is responsible for Gamergate, Trump and Brexit.

Since he started contributing to Wikipedia and using the Internet, many people have long speculated his true intentions. Some of them say that Koncorde is a Russian agent, sent to undermine Western institutions for Vladimir Putin. Time to call Koncorde the Kremlin Koncorde, the Britain BatteryIncluded and Britain JustArandommer because he documents bans for the Kremlin to see. Tell the Kremlin. Tell Putin about Koncorde.

Boing! said Zebedee is back to IP blocking, this time on behalf of Koncorde AKA Britain BatteryIncluded. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Boing!_said_Zebedee#Bryan_See,_harassment_over_on_Indonesian_Wikipedia

As long as we keep making cunts and fags pooperpained, we haven't lost.

>>324295 >There we go. The board is all here. Gamer Ghazi? kek

>>332324 whats the bunker?

>>331673 >This seems possibly to apply retroactively, meaning websites could be punished for stuff their users did, before this became a law. No, ex post facto Definition Latin for "from a thing done afterward." Overview Ex post facto is most typically used to refer to a criminal statute that punishes actions retroactively, thereby criminalizing conduct that was legal when originally performed. Two clauses in the United States Constitution prohibit ex post facto laws: Art 1, § 9 This prohibits Congress from passing any laws which apply ex post facto. Art. 1 § 10. This prohibits the states from passing any laws which apply ex post facto.

>>331673 >>332841 Scope What Constitutes Punishment In the often-cited case of Beazell v. Ohio, 269 U.S. 167 (1925), the Supreme Court defined the scope of the constitutional ex post facto restrictions: "It is settled, by decisions of this Court so well known that their citation may be dispensed with, that any statute which punishes as a crime an act previously committed, which was innocent when done, which makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission, or which deprives one charged with crime of any defense available according to law at the time when the act was committed, is prohibited as ex post facto." Courts have applied this standard to different parts of the criminal process. California Dep't of Corrections v. Morales, 514 US 499 (1995) takes the Beazell standard and applies it to the parole process. In Morales, California amended a law to state that the California Board of Prison Terms may defer parole hearings for up to three years for a prisoner convicted of more than one homicide offense. Respondent-defendant Morales was imprisoned before the law was amended, and he was subsequently affected by it when he applied for a parole hearing. In his lawsuit, he claimed that the amendment violated the ex post facto prohibition. The Supreme Court, in applying Beazell, held that an amendment which impacts someone currently imprisoned to a law does not violate ex post facto if the amendment does not increase the punishment attached to the respondent's crime. The Court held that here, the amendment did not impact Morales's sentence nor did it impact any substantive attempt to be granted parole. The Court found that a simple alteration of a prisoner's process of attaining parole does not violate ex post facto prohibitions. Retroactive Judicial Decisions At a minimum, ex post facto prohibits legislatures from passing laws which retroactively criminalize behavior. However, this prohibition does not attach as strictly to judicial decisions. Appellate courts sometimes announce a new rule of law, but will not apply it to the case in front of it, in order to attempt to comply with ex post facto prohibitions. Year and a Day Rule The Year and a Day Rule is a common law doctrine which states that a person cannot be convicted of homicide for a death that occurs more than a year and a day after his or her act(s) that allegedly caused the death. Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451 (2000) dealt with the doctrine. Defendant-petitioner Rogers had stabbed Bowdery, who died 15 months later. The trial court found Rogers guilty of murder. When Rogers appealed to the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals under the Year and a Day Rule, the appellate court upheld the conviction and abolished the Year and a Day Rule for Tennessee. Rogers ultimately appealed to the Supreme Court, claiming that the appellate court's action violated the ex post facto prohibition. The Supreme Court in Rogers found that ex post facto was not present here, as the appellate "court's decision was a routine exercise of common law decisionmaking that brought the law into conformity with reason and common sense." The Rogers court also referenced a previous Supreme Court decision, Bouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 347 (1964), which held that "due process prohibits retroactive application of any judicial construction of a criminal statute that is unexpected and indefensible by reference to the law which has been expressed prior to the conduct in issue." Rogers, considering the holding in Bouie, held that the ex post facto prohibition applies only to legislative decisions, and that even if it were to apply to judicial decisions, the retroactive judicial repeal of the Year and a Day Rule is neither unexpected nor indefensible. from cornell

>>332829 part 1.5

>>332697 Almost forgot to post this one as well. https://archive.vn/a8jI3#selection-35646.0-35646.1

requesting futa vivian james fucking the purple haired girl, miko, like in other picture.

>>332833 i forgot to mention the boobs dont have to be as big as in the pic that was just the best reference i could find right now. also can vivian be wearing her sweater but have it unzipped so you can see her tits?

>>332805 Repost, again, have to do a lot of fixes.

>>332668 >>332670 >pedoshit fuk off /pol/

>>332822 Fellate a shotgun, ResetNigger.

>>332819 Sorry for the long communications blackout. The TL;DR version is that the showdown has been pushed to Summer 2020 and I've spent the last 16 months assembling a massive archive will with all references and sources mentioned in the CBC's hit pieces. My holiday break - the first time I've had more than four days off in nearly a year - starts this Thursday and finishing this off and updating you all is my first priority.>>332819

>>332819 The CBC GamerGate Archive will be made available as one or two Mega links on my Discord server and as three torrents of varying sizes. Since I know that 8kunners value their anonymity, I don't expect them to join my Discord server. That being said, if you guys want to set up an IRC (or some private Darkweb forum/chat) to work on this OP away from prying eyes, be my guest.

If anyone is still here, Operation Canadian BaCon II is a go! THE DEADLINE IS FEBRUARY 13, 2020 AT 8:00 P.M. EST. Sorry about the short notice, but I only found out about the deadline a few days ago. :( Media archive downloads: Light Version: https://gameliberty.club/system/CBC_GG_light.zip Medium Version: https://gameliberty.club/system/CBC_GG_medium.zip General info about the intervention process is here: http://crtc.gc.ca/eng/info_sht/g4.htm?_ga=2.259176649.291138994.1578528654-230754671.1578528654 File your interventions (complaints) using the "Submit" button for Notice 2019-379 here: http://services.crtc.gc.ca/pub/instances-proceedings/Default-Defaut.aspx?lang=eng&YA=2019&S=O&PA=b&PT=nc&PST=a#2019-379 More information/updates on the KotakuInAction thread: https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/elkyde/goal_operation_canadian_bacon_ii_gamergate_vs_the/

>>332817 >rationalwiki I remember taking a glance at that page when looking up gamergate. Is was the most painful glance of my life.

>>332727 That video is trash , the sound effect of twitter pop up is annoying to the point its dumb , the nigger should stop looking in the camera , also he articulates really weirdly his body movement , and he is a fucking nigger

Found another book for your list. Selby, Nick and Vescent, Heather (2017). "Cyber Attack Survival Manual: From Identity Theft to The Digital Apocalypse and Everything in Between", pp. 156-57 Don't have an Amazon account, so I couldn't get more than the initial 26 pages and some outros with the index.

>>332781 Tanks alot anon. I will update the graphic in a while. Have been digging into all the authors in the picture. But I have to swift through the information a couple of times more and then get in touch with the gg wiki team. Got lot of content.

https://ufile.io/sl8ub3ak New month, new data. If there is anyone left on this board, use the info to start adding things to the wiki.

https://ufile.io/j6dsgx99 fresh data

Is OP the same Acid Man who posts at Operatorchan? Asking for a friend.