ohhhh who's that fucking famous cunt in that song where he oww the songs not exactly about it but he knows all the pressure that everyone gets put at them from the lyrics (that isn't the artist at fault) but this one fuckwit goes ahead of all that pressure in a few lines and puts a fucking pressure there if you've had it at you (or you wouldn't notice). And it does a crime.

Is this the thread where I can talk about the free market?

>>19740 Are you the spiritual ancap poster from old fringe with the Portuguese commune?

>>19749 He claimed to be Moses right?

What the hell is wrong with Sweden?

>>19782 >16 year old >working at McDonald's wtf. I thought Sweden is a welfare state. Also she looks 20 at least. And why wasn't she in school at September 1. Don't tell me she goes to school then works at McDonald's after that. Are Swedish girls this poor nowadays? There are way too many things wrong with this case.

>>19782 >>19837 Suggestion: 1) Rape laws in Sweden are feminist, which means almost anything can be reported as "rape". One can be raped over the Internet, by proxy (telling someone else to perform the rape) or by simply touching someone. A gynecologist was reported for "rape" by a woman who "felt raped" after the medical examination. Paying for OF content where the woman is touching herself is "economic rape". 2) A common claim is that courts will declare the "rapist" as innocent. What is rarely told is that this is usually done by female judges who know exactly how ridiculous the rape laws are, and that women always abuse the word "rape." Moreover, a female judge is likely to side with the man if it's an immigrant, because they all love black men. It's unlikely that a woman was raped by an immigrant, as women will normally agree to it if the man is an immigrant. Female judges know this. Conclusion: With above taken into account, to draw this to an extreme, some possible things could have happened: #1: The girl was indeed touched by the man, for around 3 seconds, which counts as "rape" in Sweden, but it's ridiculous to deport someone over this, even if it's legally "rape", so they then use the wording that its "duration" was to short. #2: The girl is a slut. She met the man in the tunnel and had sex with him willingly, but was caught in the act. To avoid the shame, she was forced to say she was raped – alternatively her parents found out about her activities and reported it as her having been raped to save face before the community.

>>19838 This appears to be a lie.

>>19863 https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/scitech/technology/946809/sweden-bans-buying-sexual-acts-online-affecting-onlyfans/story/ https://www.government.se/articles/2025/07/a-stronger-protection-against-sexual-violations/ https://erlinghellenas.wordpress.com/2010/09/01/the-swedish-rape-law/

>>19880 In clarification, there is a difference between the exact wording of law text, and the way it was motivated by the lawmakers. "One should not be allowed to rape women online" or "Paying for sexual material constitutes a form of rape" may be used in argumentations, as well as media discussions, which does not directly reflect in a law as falling under the rape clause, when "paying for sex" has its own separate crime category, even if the reason it is illegal is motivated as it being a form of rape.

>>19880 This is completely irrelevant to you outright false claim that sexual assault or harassment is legally considered rape in Sweden. >>19884 If you're saying the news story is lying then you need to provide some actual evidence.

>>19880 There is a long standing feminist idea in play which drives the narrative that women's work is undervalued, with housewives as the prime example: they are working without a salary. This is solved by making it inconvenient for housewives to exist, forcing them into the labour market, where they will instead get paid to - in crude speech - do the same work for someone else and getting paid for it, effectively just alienating their own home environment and letting someone else do their own work, as if this changed anything. But oh it did, now the exchange of work can be taxed, whereas women working in their own homes cannot be. Clean your neighbor's toilet and exchange money, you are now a productive member of society compared to when you did your own chores. But, here comes the dichotomy: When we talk about sex work, women are not allowed to get paid for it. They are to always perform this type of work with no compensation! Now this is feminism! Only women could be this irrational. It is believed, that no one can willingly consent to paid sex work, only unpaid sex work can be willing. There is no rationale in this, and the fear of seeing this, seems like the driving force behind the banning of anything which may in some way ACTUALLY raise the value of the work women perform. "Feminists" are here just maintaining the patriarchy, they have internalized it so strongly that they will even patronize their sisters, telling them that they are not adults or responsible in the sex market. If unpaid sex isn't rape, then what is? (rhetorical Q)

>>19888 >If you're saying the news story is lying then you need to provide some actual evidence. Here is the actual verdict: https://www.scribd.com/document/935225615/Hovratten-for-Ovre-Norrland-B-1393-24-Dom-2025-09-09 Translation of the relevant part (page 7): " In the present case, it is indeed a matter of a relatively short sequence of events where the most serious sexual contact consisted of penetration of the complainant’s genitals with fingers. These circumstances could suggest that the act should be classified as less serious. At the same time, in the Court of Appeal’s view, there are a number of circumstances that argue against such a classification. The act took place in the evening in a public location and was directed at a stranger who was very young. The assault came as a surprise to the complainant and was frightening, causing intense fear. It was an act aimed at sexual penetration. When the complainant made it clear that she did not want contact with Yazid Mohamed, he did not respect this but instead held her down and continued the assault. Under these circumstances, the act cannot be considered less serious. The act must therefore be classified as rape of normal degree. "

>>19890 Yeah, penetration with fingers is rape. That isn't a controversial definition. There is absolutely no reason why this man shouldn't get deported for that.

>>19891 The real reason why he's not getting deported is because he's an uncivilized non-white, which means that he's part of the plan of the NWO to replace all of the white & non-white people with a slave race of people who are too dumb to oppose the NWO, but are also smart enough to do what the NWO tells them to do. They want to do this via. racemixing these savage & uncivilized non-whites with the docile & civilized whites; that's why they used money to get all of these mudslimes & blacks to invade the E.U., and to get more wetbacks to invade the U.S.

>>19931 >They want to do this via. racemixing these savage & uncivilized non-whites with the docile & civilized whites That makes no sense. If they're so docile and civilized they'd obey already, why make them more aggressive via racemixing then? Or are you suggesting Eritreans are in fact more docile? How are they then a threat.

>>19957 I think the point might be to make the savage races become less aggressive via. racemixing with whites so that they'd be more likely to obey the NWO. There's also the fact that whites are smart enough that they're more likely to catch onto what's going on, and the NWO doesn't want that. this is stuff I read on /pol/ some time last decade; I don't remember the whole thing about it but that's the gist of it; I'd love to be proven wrong about it, but then I'd need another explanation for this obvious NWO-orchestrated push for racemixing that mostly just happens in western countries

>>19960 I've seen self proclaimed NWO supporters/insiders on /x/ and /pol/ say that their model societies are current day Japan and China, and they want the west to become like them. That means high tech and homogeneous ethnicity. So it doesn't make sense with what you're suggesting if that's true.

>>19957 >why make them more aggressive via racemixing then? Because they share your hatred of Whites and want to destroy them. The fact that you're literally supporting rape ITT just because it was committed by a migrant against a White woman proves the depths of your evil. Everyone on this site should remember that, if they're White, Blood Anon would gladly sanction not only rape but infinite additional evils to be committed against you, because one of his goals is literally your destruction. This fact influences every one of his interactions with people who aren't black or brown.

This whole thing is retarded. I am pretty sure the browncel grew up watching porn where the male tickled the girl and she started sucking his dick. He thought it will be that easy. All white girls are sluts for browns after all. That is what the pornjew told him. Also this case was brought up on every board to derail discussions on 4cuck. I have seen a thread about this on /v/. Unsure what is the angle here. >>19964 White people don't exist anymore. Everyone is mixed with browns or asians already.

Oh wow an another. Done by an Algerian woman. Why are women like this???

>>19965 Oh gee I wonder what the angle is. Could it be that people are legitimately upset that we live in an anarcho-tyranny system where niggers are literally allowed to rape and murder freely so long as they're not White? No, must be something else.

>>19967 >we live in an anarcho-tyranny Do you live in Sweden? My condolences

>>19965 >>19967 The attention directed at this one case outside of Sweden is abnormal. It was reported by exactly 2 mainstream media outlets in Sweden, where it gained no attention at all. The original article is this long interview with the victim, from a local newspaper. That means it was only seen by people in the very nearest local area. Translate if you care: https://www.pt.se/story-nyheter/skelleftea/artikel/meya-17-valdtogs-vid-gangtunnel-han-har-forstort-mig/lqmx6mer Actually, you won't be able to, the article seems locked unless following a specific referral link, which means it's very unlikely any international media even read the original article, as you need to be a subscriber to a small local newspaper to access it. The only other report was a 2.5 min mention on public radio. The 2 other reports on this case are both from media outlets associated with the Sweden Democrat party, meaning the "former" nazi party who are now rebranded as pro-Israel racists instead, because it's impossible to be a nazi anymore. Internationally it seems to have been then picked up by UK nationalist/racist media outlets. Whoever is shilling this on 4chan is likely organized by the same group who are behind the highly inorganic protests taking place in UK right now.

>>19969 >a migrant commits rape and goes unpunished for it >"this must be the fault of the racists!" Typical. You really are Evil, you know that?

>>19970 >3 years in prison >unpunished wat

>>19970 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWGnHCaqxdU

There hasn't been a single chemtrail in my sky since the government shut down.

>>20080 We can't expect the government to brainwash and poison the USA population for free

Climate narrative is done, China was the only one actually making money on it, so it's been cancelled.

>>20553 so the guy who just bought up the largest farmland of the USA and farms and cows were causing the most emissions according to climate activists invested heavily into big pharma and population control vaccines The datacenters of his company are eating more electricity than the entire states where they are built and driving up electricity prices wherever they are placed also very climate friendly move Suddenly decided that climate activism is unnecessary? Darn. Wonder why.

>>20553 >more money should be spent on things I invested into >said philanthropist This should have been the headline

Which way NY?

>>21021 >foot fountain that's some david firth shit

That's disgusting.