If we ever go back to /icup/ again, these anthems we'll use.

/monarchy/ is invited to the 3rd 8moe Duels Soulcalibur 6 tournie. You are welcome to add another character (if you want) or re-roll your character's fighting style fighting style. The event is being hosted at >>>/icup/5943 It will be sometime this upcoming weekend.

Esther and her best friends. Colour version HD coming soon...

Now, I promised: Esther and her best friends Avellana of /av/, Grace of /monarchy/ and Lila of /tkr/ Colour version and HD

Thomas Hobbes Leviathan: <And of that opinion, the external signs appearing in the Words, and Actions of men, are called Worship; which is one part of that which the Latins understand by the word Cultus: Hobbes Leviathan: >For Cultus signifies properly, and constantly, that labour which a man bestows on any thing, with a purpose to make benefit by it. Hobbes Leviathan >In the first sense the labour bestowed on the Earth, is called Culture; and the education of Children a Culture of their minds.

My political ideology is Monarchia Natio Coloniae (Or, as Hitler calls it in Mein Kampf, dynasty patriotism). Meaning, the cultivation of a people with Monarchy (or a work of Monarchy upon the people). When I say colony in Monarchia Natio Coloniae my intent is a cultivation of politics, to make a people & politics a colony of monarchy.

This should be helpful.

>>6741 >your IP is from a known spammer Well guess TOR not working.

Anyone noticed that Graceposter basically disappeared once King Charles took to the throne?

>>7856 online leftists are the most boring type of people anyway, they also worship minorities like they aren't violent criminals

>>2450 (OP) >>7859 Youre fucking retarded

>>7898 (OP) Well done for eloquently putting it. Of course concerns over hereditary weaknesses exist. It's been speculated that Prince William shot his love rival to a bloody mess with a shotgun and that the royal palace covered it up. It's up to you to decide whether as two become one flesh, an assault however invited by the wife is an assault upon the self upon which it's justifiable to react with such force, or if these are unkingly/unqueenly ways for royals to behave. I've seen fit to conclude that "Prince William is quietly based". In any case it is my hope that little George is more than the sum of his parts. William will fear the jews ability to oust his guilty consciences to an unfeeling and unforgiving world and so this strategy goes on and on down the line. Get compromising details or information on them, then blackmail them accordingly. The same will happen to little George and to his kin. The idea it's always easy to stir plebescian outrages is true but it's in the job description of a King to effectively handle these things. There's a two-fold threat offered by the rumblings of the plebes. The first threat comes from revolutionary figures appearing to have gained for themselves or even worse the group as a whole, the so-called "mandate of heaven". The way out is for the leaders of the rebellion to die not as martyrs but as a result of their own flaws and their own vices. Mandate of God in so doing leaves them. The second threat comes from either foreign or your own domestic spooks with their drone technology and their bay of pigs psy operations. This one is relatively recent and evolving. It was not quite as easy in the 14th century to get that many bad actors that close to the King and his palace staff. The best answer I have is "go and get yourself a lot of legitimate sons". You can't afford to dwell with paranoia over what might drop out of the sky, or hide from every civic and public engagement. My more eager concerns are how do I get from a parliamentary democracy back to the monarch being in charge of our country? First I might shrink the parliament down from 650, but it does not matter where you shrink it towards. You can say "150 or fewer is ideal", or "90 to 120 is ideal", or "two classrooms' worth is ideal" but it's not the number of them that corrupts the institution so much as the manner of their running. Originally this parliament sat once yearly to decide how the King's tax men were to behave in raising funds against an enemy realm. Looking at the modern state (literally "State" of it now) is appalling. I must know how to get to there again and then I must know ways of addressing it in a plebescian way. Until then I think we are damned. The furthest we can hope for out of our system is maybe a figure like Milei.

>>2729 > yes, yes and yes

UK in pretty rough shape now. Shame.

>>2728 (OP) Yes.

>>7925 >since you have made your opinion on right Libertarians quite clear elsewhere. It is reciprocal tbh. Like I said, Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn says in an interview Absolute Monarchy is evil. & others have vilified us with prominent historical narratives coming from Alexis de Tocqueville & Bertrand de Jouvenel & I see Hoppe's From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy as an extension. The right libertarian crowd, constitutional monarchists, utlra-clerical Catholics, etc, they're always my main opposition b/c of it. I guess you could say you cannot blame one side or the other for starting it. This debate in the history of political thought extends far, far, far back.

Pope Leo XIV

>>7931 Well, I suppose that's unfortunate then. I really do believe we have more in common than not. Certainly more that right Libertarians have with Liberals and Democrats.

The Stuarts + Julio-Claudians are my favorites. I also have a soft spot for the Kim dynasty.

>>7502 (OP) Habsburgs. Also Přemyslovci.

>>7502 (OP) No question here.

>>4505 Its not Cirno.

>then as a catholic traditionalist, I will assert the idea of decentralization and one among equals for monarchy and the idea of a Europe of a Thousand Liechensteins <although I would NEVER peddle those same ideals for the Pope as one among equals among the bishops nor abide well with a thousand Protestant denominations being like a pagan pantheon in every country.

Just the tip of the iceberg of all the insanity surrounding constitutional monarchists.

It is like Sauron from Lord of the Rings. Having Monarchy is just bad because like Sauron and the One Ring. No one man should rule. Nobody should have power. Throw the ring into the fire, frodo.

If anyone should be Anarcho-Monarch, Pope Francis. The perfect Monarch is the Anarcho-Monarch who doesn't rule a State. Pope Francis doesn't rule a State. A Church is nothing like ruling a State & unlike a State it is fully consensual & voluntary from Church tithes up.

It is about sharing love and giving love freely instead of taking it. This scene 100% describes my new outlook on monarchy.

If the monarch has no majesty, but is simply a pawn or a fashion accessory for whatever denomination -- this won't do.

>>7860 An absolute monarch has way more incentive to care about public appearances than a purely figurehead monarch who has no stake whatsoever. This is more natural and comely to an actual ruler. >However, if the monarch attempts to advocate such ideas for the realm, these checks and balances must be activated. Is this about King Charles III? If there was ever an emblem of constitutional monarchy, this is as far as it gets & yet this is a problem. King Charles III is no atheist, but inspired by the traditionalist & perennial views (which attests in universalism of religions). So Charles III wanted to be Defender of the Faiths. >but understands the importance of religious institutions for the harmony of the realm I think you should follow a likewise example & understand the importance of monarchy to political society. What Christ does to the Church (i.e., gives a blood relationship, makes them a family), a Monarch does for political society (makes them one family). Monarchy, that is, the unifying leadership of one person, brings harmony. This is the strongest virtue political society can achieve for men, because they have the virtue of a family altogether, which means staying through good and bad times, which means not stabbing and betraying one another in factionalism, which means a blood bond to said monarch, like a child to his father, which should be revered as inseparable and a common source of unity in that society.

If your view of the monarch in monarchy (in general) is like gollum from Lord of the Rings, you're playing into disbelief (& not in a state of awe); people constantly keep this in mind, which makes for very bad monarchists for kings. ... I've always been of the opinion Communists make way better monarchists for their Leaders. They regard Lenin and Mao like prophets, highly idealized & with strong belief in their politics. Monarchists regard theirs like Gollum, a shrivel little creature & only a companion. ... You have to make people believe again. Refurbish them with a notion of pre-eminence w/ monarchy, a sense of Majesty. Constitutional monarchists are competing with politicians who'll offer the people a lot more & who'll make them in awe of their leadership, making people monarchists for them & no king.