/tg/ - Traditional Games

For roleplaying games, board games and card games

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0 (Temporarily Dead).

Ghost Screen
Celebrating its fifth anniversary all September


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

You enter a strange web board filled with terrible off topic posts, roll courage to avoid fleeing. Aligned Boards Random|Hisrol|AV|literature|Animu|retro vidya|Japan

Anonymous 04/23/2025 (Wed) 21:29:36 Id: 20da06 No. 2712
Why do many modern gamers reject combat result tables and critical hit tables? I think they can be good when used properly.
Looking at giant charts of numbers is borderline videogame-backend and not fun You are doing machine sorting, manually. There is nothing engaging with looking at number charts. There is no player imput on looking at number charts, finding stuff in number charts, and declaring an output in number charts. Critical hit charts are fun when you use it once. You get a laugh at the result "If you hit 18 a small goblin comes out and steal your socks lol", the table laughs, it's fun. After that, you quickly learn the outcomes and becomes stale like, by the second time you roll 18 "yeye the goblin, ok"
>>2744 >You are doing machine sorting, manually. Isn't that the DM's role?
Why use them when there are better ways? Nobody wants to pause the game and go look at a chart when they can just + a number onto their roll.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply