>>536276
>OPWDD even tied my social security income to paying both my medical benefits and my rent, and imposed a maximum savings limit of $2,000, meaning that if I save over $2,000, social security will stop paying the benefits and rent until I spend down the money and get it under $2,000.
A little late now, but couldn't you sort-of bypass that by buying investments like gold and silver coins, or even fucking bitcoin?
Because that way you still have the money, and even see it accrue in value as time passes, even if it doesn't exist as a number in your bank account. Or did they track and confescate your purchases?
>>536312
>Why do trans people keep getting blamed for retarded white feminism?
Because the Feminists don't even understand their own ideology. Queer Theory (Transgenderism) is the next stage of Feminism, and Feminism is a sexualized version of Socialism, and Marx based all this Socialist theories off of Hegel and his religion (
Which was just revived Gnosticism and Hermeticism/Alchemy ). And as Hegel said regarding his religious framework:
<History uses people and then discards them.
So the simple fact of the matter is that the TERFs have now become useless for the purposes of pushing the Dialectic and are being discarded by the elites in favor of the capital "Q" Queers.
>There's nothing wrong with being a man, at all, in any way.
Not according to the Feminists. In their loony spin on the Gnostic faith, "the Patriarchy" exploits men just as much as it does women, and prevents men from being their "true selves" (See vid as an example of how they see men as being "oppressed") just like it's preventing women from being their "true" selves. So the goal is to get men and women to work together for the purposes of "smashing the Patriarchy" and achieve a utopian society where both men and women can finally be their "true selves". And what would that look like in practice? My best guess would be the sexual dynamics you see with hyenas. In fact, I think it would be
EXACTLY that kind of society as you see feminists writers like Jarge Carr depict that very thing in their own works, as she did in the science fiction novel Leviathan's Deep when crafting the Delyenes (
An matriarchal race of fish-people who are being invaded by the "evil Patriarchial" humans ).
>They destroy every positive male role model for young white boys, and then wonder why young white boys don't turn into boyfriend material when they grow up.
Yes because they haven't "smashed the Patriarchy" yet, according to their religion. It's self-affirming circular reasoning. Men are no longer "boyfriend material" only because "the Patriarchy" made them unattractive as a result of those men becoming a "Male ally". So the only way to save these "Male allies", and all men by extension, is to "smash the Patriarchy" as it would magically result in men becoming "boyfriend material" again because the threat and control of "the Patriarchy" would no longer exist.