>>451434 you got to learn somehow also the upper brass wasn't trusted by the grunts shorty after they landed

>>451436 >also the upper brass wasn't trusted by the grunts shorty after they landed Shortly after they landed is a few minutes after they died. It's far too late.

>>451436 >you got to learn somehow Humans have been gifted with the amazing ability to plan ahead, rather than trial and error things like "would jumping into this woodchipper shred my legs? D-Day was China tier tactics.

>>451438 iron within, iron without

>>451440 Eat shit, traitor.

>>451455 like you rape a baby to death to save yourself

>>451456 More nonsensical mewling from chaos pledged miscreant traitor filth. You made your choice "aluminum warrior". Enjoy your dark Gods eternal displeasure.

>>451456 like you wouldn't* >>451460 the emperor needed help from a woman

>>451461 According to said woman. So. Excuse me if I take that with a grain of salt. Also you should feel ashamed for listening to and believing the words of, a woman.

>>451462 god damn it you got me

What's amazing is the legions of sheep who obeyed orders to essentially kill themselves pointlessly running into fire, say what you like about it 'winning the war' and all that but there's much smarter ways to operate that include shooting your commanding officer, or not being there in the first place.

>>451500 dude until mechanized warfare following orders and being willing to die for the group is what let you not get slaughtered by the opposition i know most of you dumb monkeys think humans are too sophisticated to be evolutionary programmed for shit, but they weren't stupid, they were smarter then either of us by virtue of being born closer to the times our genome was healthy

>>451501 lamo

>>451501 >People who willingly ended their own bloodlines only to ultimately fight for the side that would destroy their own country are smart

>>451544 their bloodlines didn't end, they reproduced ethnically via making sure their ethic group wasn't dominated by other groups, even it cost them not having children themselves, they reproduced through their group you're arguing the lore wolf survival over a pack's survival, the lore wolf doesn't survive >b4 it has to be you doing it for your genes to get any benefit nope, by maintaining your group, you have people that share your genes, and thus you can get more then 50% of your genes into the next generation this doesn't apply today because you need homogeneity in the gene pool so it will be your genes you're helping, but has no consequences for the past

>>451546 >Millions of mulatto babies are maintaining your group's bloodline Lmao.

>>451547 you know that isn't what I said, cuckold >you need homogeneity in the gene pool even if the miscegenation pops were all 'homogeneously' mutts of the same two pops, they wouldn't able to ethnically reproduce, because they share less genes with each other then normal groups

>>451548 >even if the miscegenation pops were all 'homogeneously' mutts of the same two pops, they wouldn't able to ethnically reproduce, because they share less genes with each other then normal groups That only proves the point.

>>451580 what is happening now has nothing to do with the evolutionary psychology of war I agree with you that what everyone that fought in WWII against the Nazis made the wrong choice, and will get nothing from the results, but you can't blame an orgasm for doing what it evolved to do, blame the rich assholes who didn't want Hitler's ideas giving people ideas that they should act in their own genetic interest

>>451581 >but you can't blame an orgasm for doing what it evolved to do That's everyone on the planet and disregards free will. >blame the rich assholes who didn't want Hitler's ideas giving people ideas that they should act in their own genetic interest They're organisms too, and if the critical thought processes, or lackthereof, that lead people to throw their lives away on D-Day can be reduced to uncontrollable forces of their instinctual nature as a result of the process of evolution, then so too can the thought processes of all those commanding them at every level of the chain of command.

>run practice exercise for D-Day >749 dead >2 ships sunk bravo

>>451582 You sould disregard free will cuz it ain't real And the rich have under less selection for so long and done gone evolved into thier own group(s) thus do shit that isn't in the interest of the groups below them Higher % of officers died in WWII then normal soliders Part of the dysgenics of mechanized War, it is more likely to kill your best and brightest because they are brave and would lead It is why the blood god wants you to hand to hand weapons

>>451586 >Higher % of officers died in WWII then normal soliders When you have a lot of dead, you have a lot of posthumous promotions.

>>451589 still killed more of the of the type of men that war is supposed to let live, and killed less of the weak and cowardly and after the war, women do not marry down, so they had no man to pick, and thus we lost their caliber of genes too it was all around a dumb idea, that only allowed the ruling families to maintain their power until the biology of the population will no longer be capable maintaining the engine of this civilization

>>451593 oh god I was talking to you reeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>>451593 You arent Jesus. You are an insane pervert kike. and if you post your asshole I swear to God I am banning you. Fucking blasphemous heretic.

>>451594 Jus so you know, you weren't talking to him. He just showed up.

>>451615 Oh cool

Everything i do is a waste of time, but wasting time to fag kike that tries to personify dysgenics is bit much

>>451434 >throw thousands upon thousands of men with practically no protection against machine gun pill boxes, hoping the enemy has less bullets than you have men Worked for the USSR

>>451434 I love how the AI can spell Pixar correctly, but can't do it consistently.

those were different times bullets were extremely valuable

>>451434 >Was it really the best the allied powers could come up with? Depends on what you mean. By number of allied casualties? No. But, if you wanted to lower future expenditures to a good degree while still winning, then yes. There's also the fact that the allied soldiers could possibly contribute to coup d'etats in their own countries after the war.

Mein kampf

>>451604 You will never be a man

>>461141 You'll never be human

>>451544 The good goyim won, axi.