>>463170
>You're definitely not aware of what I'm talking about and also misunderstanding some of it. I assume you weren't actually here at the time and are repeating what you read on bunkerchan?
Even after Old BO's spergeout, nobody left 8chan until the site collapsed. Bunkerchan only got populated afterward.
>ask Mark as he was actually involved.
Wait, was Mark the same guy who sold Jim on moving the site from Vichan to some new platform that he was developing that turned out to be a buggy, unusable mess? That shit was funny.
>But like I said, 8chan/8kun was around for over a year after the massacre and actually still exists
Yeah, but that's kun. Nobody cares about kun.
>Did you manage to see any of that by the way? Hilarious, so many posts of "FUCK YOU Q YOU LIED TO US Q"
That shit was hilarious. /pol/ had a few crises of confidence, but that was probably the biggest one. It was even bigger than the one where Trump hired Steven Mnuchen to run the treasury and prayed at the Western Wall.
>>463174
You know, I have always wondered that. Why did the shooters go after children, foreigners, and "Chad and Stacy"s? It seemed like the Illinois Nazis were less likely to go on rampages than the lonely little social outcasts were. I suppose it makes some sense that they would end up being the psycho killers, because they always had been before with Cho, Harris and Klebold, and the like. That they went after the people they blamed for their inability to get laid makes sense in that context. Politics can make people crazy, but being losers makes them want to kill.
>>463175
The shooters have been getting higher body counts than the bombers have been. The attacks in Mumbai and Moscow produced big numbers. Yeah, the shooters get caught and die, but I don't imagine that bothers them greatly.