>>466056
Q1: "What is the objective of life?"
A1: To approach the limit (unachievable yet infinitely approachable goal) of creating the most perfect form of life.
Q2: "What is the most perfect form of life?"
A2: The ultimate lifeform, an organism of the greatest genetic fitness and reproductive success, able to propagate as well as possible in as many environments as possible (relative to their complexity), most likely a highly technological species, as the extended phenotype of technology is the secret to expansion beyond ones environment of origin.
Q3: "How does life approach this limit?"
A3: Through competition and the elimination of the genetic contributions from instances of life that fail to meet the standards of furthering the proagation of their genetics, we find what works by eliminating what doesn't, we determine who is right by seeing who is left, the genes that can outlast all others and achieve the most success in spreading themselves, withstanding competing genetics and environmental conditions, are the best genetic traits.
Q4: "What does this have to do with politics?"
A4: Because as it stands today, politics are the biggest selective factor for the human species, who are currently the frontrunners of Earth's organisms for the closest to being the ultimate, most perfect lifeform.
The best society is the one that best allows humanity to continually evolve itself closer to that unreachable ideal of an organism that not only spreads itself out into every environment, but one that completely transforms it, an organism that not only survives in every place it arrives in, but thrives everyplace it goes. I want the planets, their moons, their suns, and every other star or celestial body to be claimed by mankind.
To this end, I've identified common themes that provide the best possible levels of advancement to human populations:
#1: White Supremacy: White Men have demonstrated their capability to outpace every other phenotypic variety of the human species, so the ideal world will be one where all non-whites are extinct, other races whose existence is not detrimental to White Men, such as the East Asian race, may continue to exist, but ideally in different locations from where the White Man lives.
We Ideally sbould be even more selective and aim towards the extermination of those whose eyes and hair are both black or brown, I'd like a White Race that has hair and eyes that are of the colors of the rainbow, blondes and redheads, blue eyes and green eyes, etc. These are recessive phenotypes that would indicate a genetic purity with their ubiquity.
#2: Male Supremacy: The female sex cannot be exterminated without ushering in the mutual destruction of their male counterparts, but where we cannot kill them, we may still do everything short of that. All humans who lack a y-chromosome are to be placed outside of the law, made into property, not people, the laws should not offer them any rights, liberties, or inherent protections. What protection the law may provide them will come to them only as a consequence of being owned by a male, benefitting from his property rights insofar as that what any other male wishes to do with her may only be permissable by law if he has the consent of the male to whom she legally belongs. Make the entire female sex less than slaves, less than animals, make them objects, reduced to their utility in providing pleasure and reproduction. The reason things got so bad was that we gave the feminine sex too much freedom and respect to begin with. They should be the property of the males who claim ownership of like my phone is the property of myself, for me and others to do with as i please, at ny control. Note that I treasure my phone, but should i destroy of cause harm to it, or give another the permission to do so, there is no law stopping that from happening.
#3: Human Supremacy: Other species may be evaluated on the basis of their urility to White Men, those with a negative impact will be exterminated, those with a neutral impact will be permitted to exist, and those with a positive impact will be kept and their populations increased. Non-humans will have far less rights and liberties than they presently do, which is to say, they will have none at all. To reiterate my central point here: rights and freedoms and property and tbe protections of the law are all only tp be given to White Men, nobody else, and nothing else, should have even a trace of them.
#4: Adult Supremacy: Democrat supporting White Males should have the same status as females, personhood is acquited at the time when sperm production begins, no active testes, no rights or liberties, the protections of the law are afforded only to those who have reached the age that allows their body to make viable sperm cells. Perhaps this rule should also extend to the exclusion of those white males who lose their reproductive potency, such as elderly men and eunichs. So until reaching biological adulthood, white male boys will be the property of white male adults.
#5: Straight Supremacy: Any Adult White Male who is discovered to have engaged in any behaviors with another male creature that could possibly spread a sexually transmissable disease from one to the other, will be exiled to a penal colony immediately, we want the fags in another location from the straights, we will do banishment rather than execution to help with discovery, and to encourage fags to turn themselves in for exile and request to be banished (theyd be in what is effectively their own country, just for queers, we could name it something like "new sodom"). Yes, they will still be fruiting it up, but fat away from men with their sanity and self respect, and it is the most effective means of diaposing of them (homos will always be getting born, so killing them will just translate to a bunch of butt bandits running about doing their perversions covertly and shitting everything up in the meantime).
After establishing that everyone but straight white men are to be exterminated, enslaved, or exiled, we can move on to the second value of an ideal society: Freedom.
We want the least government and law possible, only what is essential to the stability of the civilization.
I like liberty because it is eugenic, the worst are permitted to die off whike the best are permitted to reap the rewards of ther merit, and propagate the genes that were vital to their success.
For this reason, I would want Night-Watchman State Minarchism with the only laws aside from those listed above being those derived from the Principle of Non-Aggression, and it should be ruled by an absolute monarch as supreme authority, with ministers overseeing the different functions of the state.
The duties of the government should be only reserved to the essentials: enforcing the law, defending the nation, and collecting taxes to fund the other two.
For tax policy, I encourage a flat tax, where every person is expected to play the exact same sum. the only data neesed to be collected is a receipt to show whether or not the tax had been paid by the individual or not, those lacking the funds to pay and cannot find another who is willing to cover the expense in their names will be stripped of their rights until their debt can be paid off, this will be made easier by the fact that there would be no interest on this debt.
The laws of the NAP should be simple: You own yourself and your property, anyone who wants to do anything that has a direct physical effect on your bodies or belongings must have your informed voluntary and ongiong consent to the action for it to be legally permissable.
where informed = you know what you are consenting to, voluntary = your consent is freely given not coerced under threat or intimidation, ongoing = your consent has not been withdrawn since the time it was given.
This should be the nature of our Imperium. But you faggots are too indoctrinated by the softness of modernity to see it for the perfect ideal that it is.
Lose your misplaced compassion, stop killing yourselves for those who dont give a fuck about you.