>>1119252 >He still plays GTA

>>1120139 I'm actually having fun ever since the enhanced update came out for PC, last time i played it was in like 2017

>>1124799 Lol what enhancements. You mean like the enhancements Bethesda did to Skyrim in anniversary edition?

>>1124846 No, they made the game prettier and faster but what i truly enjoyed is how they finally added animals events and all that stuff to Online, it feels way more alive like single player.

I just downloaded it on gaypass last night, but only played a few minutes of campaign. Didn’t really grab me, but is it worth it over waiting for 6?

>>1125257 The campaign is definitely the weakest of the franchise but the heists are still fun to do

>>1119252 >7th gen servers shut down I know it was years ago but I'm still bummed. Had a lot of fun with it. >inb4 just buy it again on Steam, bro Nah, not the same. Probably drowning in hackers, too. >>1125257 VI will basically be V on steroids. If you disliked one, you'll hate the other.

>haven't played in a while >want to play it again >remember the niggerstar launcher exists why must rockstar be the most retarded and jewish company in all of gaming.

>>1125922 >Nah, not the same. Probably drowning in hackers, too. Havent seen a single hacker since the E&E update dropped

>>1125862 I disagree. It's the 2nd best campaign in the mainline GTA series behind GTA SA. GTA IV is too boring, GTA III and Vice City are too short and insipid, and GTA 2 and 1 are arcade games with no story not even made by the same team that made 3.

>>1124883 Wow so they improved the graphics a smidge and added a couple events that will be flavor of the month at best. Tell me when they remove shark cards and online modders

>>1126301 >Tell me when they remove shark cards Never, but i don't know why someone would get butthurt about that. It's not like money is hard to get like gold bars from RDR2 >and online modders See >>1126165

Hey anon you should play a game that doesn't suck ass

GTA IV is better than GTA V

We already have a GTA thread going, OP. https://8chan.moe/v/res/1119252.html

>>1151714 Meant for >>1151303 who made a new thread. Interesting that mods merged them instead of deleting the newer one.

>>1154534 Yeah, that usually happens so that people don't get as confused wondering where their posts went. >>1125922 I liked V, but I liked it back when it came out trn years ago and everything about it was still impressive and unique. Every single thing that's been done to it since then is a travesty.

>>1126253 Idk how people call IV boring when it has the least amount of filler missions out of any GTA. I can understand calling it repetitive but I rather enjoy the missions focusing on driving and shooting compared to gimmick missions that are big in SA and V

>>1156088 I just hate New York

>>1159485 >I just hate the greatest city in human history Pearls before swine.

>>1161709 1900s NY is kino 2000s onwards NY is boring and ugly

>>1131659 >It's not like money is hard to get This is an utter joke. If you want the most expensive in game items without delving into your own wallet you will need hundreds of hours of grinding to get them and that's not even factoring in all the modders who will ruin your results, setting you back a lot of time

>>1162516 Not anymore, doing the solo McKenzie hangar heist, that is really easy and fairly quick, gets you like 850 thousand Feels like Kikestar pulled the breaks on the grind after RDR2 Online failed i think

>>1162826 The only time I really had fun online is playing cops and robbers (while being the robber and always winning) and playing car sumo

Oh and the only other time I had fun was when I was using a mod client too. Will the next GTA also have shitty limits on car speed like GTA5 does? I'm guessing it will. There is no reason why a super car should only be 40 mph faster than a fucking truck. Pretty much the only thing I used the client for was to tweak vehicles to reflect how they reflect there in real life equivalents, me preferring vehicles that go about 180 mph

>>1163271 >Will the next GTA also have shitty limits on car speed like GTA5 does? I'm guessing it will. They wont because that was a PS3 / X360 limitation. The E&E added HSW upgrades and removed the speed limitation

The only valid reason I can think of for the severe speed restrictions is 1) to extend the games runtime and 2) to pander to filthy casuals.

>>1163310 I'll look into E&E

>>1163368 HSW cars fucking fly, it's even hard to control

>>1163310 The fastest vehicle doesn't go faster than 180 mph, totally disappointing

>>1161870 late 90s NYC looked colorful and magical, at least according to GTA III and Parasite Eve

I waited for decades and they never added a Chumash / Vespucci beach front house There's just no way they won't have them in Vice City right?

>be selling weed >truck gets stuck >suddenly get this message and lose the product despite nothing being destroyed

I just noticed that Benny's Lowriders are missing Column Shiter Levers from Interior section in E&E for PC.

this stupid fucking sale sucks enough already and the truck still keeps bugging out, how did this shit even get through the playtest?

>tfw i died once to the cops shit sux, but the weed bonus is some good money and i got the police caracara. i tried to make it look like the car means business once it rolls up into the location.

I think it's BS they will delay it like they did with Red Dead 2 and most likely it will release in 2027 because the hype it has to live up to is INSANE literally never seen before

>>1195412 They said they wouldn't release it while Donald Trump was president

>>1193634 >but the weed bonus is some good money How to grind?

>>1195440 Seriously?when?who?some redditor soiboi who worked there as a programmer there 15 years ago?

Latina women are built exclusively for BWC

>>1195440 That's unfortunate since Donald Trump is running for a third term and beyond.

>>1195412 Why care, it's gonna be garbage for edgy 12y/o.

1. There's already a thread 2. I don't really care. I have no doubt it'll be huge, but it's going to be more hand-holdy, "no fun allowed" slop like GTA5 and RDR2 were. I don't know how GTA peaked in mechanical complexity with GTA:SA, a game from 2004.

>>1195826 The brother CEO that left Rockstar lmao

>>1195474 i usually just make my character sit on the master control terminal, put my controller upside down so it leans on the thumbsticks and go afk. it's slow but it'll get you 2-3mil per day for essentially doing nothing.

>>1204514 All you need is a club house and a weed farm?

Are the /vg/ Anons migrated here for now? This is the only /gtag/ thread I have found in my searching.

>>1212131 Whatever the case I'll try to contribute. I haven't played this game in a minute. I'm poor on PC though, and I still have yet to learn enough about networking to be comfortable attempting to solve my buffer bloat problem. I wouldn't want to mess something up unknowingly.

>>1212131 I'd meant to post this one, not a duplicate of that one cover.

>>1212131 >Are the /vg/ Anons migrated here for now? This is why i made this thread

Part of me wants to get back into this game, but the gameplay loop just kills it for me. I did a Dax mission, which I started in the city, and it gave me the go postal van in the desert, so that I could drive up near Paleto Bay, for a 25k pay, because the van bugged out at the gate where you sound your horn for it to be opened, and it wouldn't accelerate after that. Didn't really help matters. Like why should I be spending that kind of time on ONE single bit of content for that small a fraction of a pay? It would make more sense, and be more enjoyable, for the game to have missions similar to emergency services missions in prior games, and you would get these kinds of pays for doing them. That would be more brief, and more sensible I think.

>>1226190 Yeah, i also hate the >deliver thing to the other side of the map in a extremely slow vehicle Type of missions

>>1227205 I think I'll just try to do some co-op heists next time I go on and pray people don't go full tard. I don't much like the mission design but when a co-op mission goes well it's kind of fun. I'll try to get some screenshots and make this thread a little more active.

>>1229182 The Guzman heist is fun, easy and you can do it solo Also pays 800k per heist

>>1229229 I might do it. I've already done it a good few times on last gen. Also, I've learned you can reroll Dax missions in the freakshop just by joining a new session. I don't know if it's the same if you activate the missions from phone. That helped me a little.

Thoughts? Or should i go back to yellow

>>1230294 I really like the notdinaco one. I'd go with it personally, but I do like the Yellow, it's a good look.

By the way a few more Anon's from the 4chan /gtag/ threads MIGHT turn up here. I don't expect these threads to be very active but I think we might be able to get something going from grass roots. I don't know who coveranon was or how exactly he made the gta covers but I will try to continue what he did and see if I can make them. I have a puter so I have the means, just not the knowledge. I BELIEVE we can rejuvenate this somewhat. Slowly but steadily! COVER ANON'S WEBSITE https://gtag-covers.neocities.org/

>>1230840 >third pic Is anon still delivering those?

>>1233245 Yes, that one was a recent one. There's a section on covernanon's site dedicated to his drawings.

>>1230840 Well, it might not be necessary that I do that, depending how quickly 4chan returns. Picrel is new.

/gtag/bros how are we going to recover from losing our board and site

>>1246036 We will cri together....

What does YOUR rapid gt look like? >inb4 crickets

Time to set out and have an adventure. Will I return with tales to tell in this wee bread? We shall see!

>>1243830 >>1246036 soon probably also anyone here has a hellion i can buy

>>1247090 Only on eggsbawx one, though I don't know if I have eggbawx live anymore.

Praying gta6 will be good, because if it's not, it might get ugly.... Woe to those who shall live to see the fall of Babylon, and may God have mercy on them.

>>1247309 >I hope it's good and not 100 dollarydoos You'll buy it anyway you brown cuckchan retard

>>1247348 No, I really won't. I think it might have to be downright miraculous for the game to be good, in fact, I almost beleive it's gauraunteed not to be, however much it will "blow other games out of the water". Yeah there are probably a lot that say similar things that will buy it when it comes out but I won't, because I know what it will likely offer already and I know I don't need it, plus I operate on a principled basis as far as that goes. I'm also White and you are assuming much about me based on very little, but it's understandable why and I forgive you for it. I just post in /gtag/ because I got hooked on that travesty of a game and invested a lot of time in it.

>internet in the toilet so stuck with solo garbage >figure I'll finish the dre shit even though all the cutscenes are long and pointless and unfunny >mission: kill johnny guns >complete two shooting galleries and chase him to a plane hangar >during another gunfight I see his car inside a plane >blow it up >I was presumably supposed to get closer to it so a cutscene where his car drives out starts so I can chase it for 45 minutes >everyone in the car is in godmode and I broke the scripting because the vehicle is a blackened husk and the cutscene won't trigger

>>1247568 kek Welcome to gta online.

>>1247309 There's a 0% chance 6 will be good. It will simply be more of the same but with updated graphics and a new play area. If that sounds like what you want then it'll be good, if not, then yeah. I hope it will be fun with friends in the same way 5 was but the annoying part of 5 was that everyone was fucking cheating and I doubt that R* will do anything to fix that.

If 6 Online is 5 but fully freemode and you can actually do even more solo heists than it will already be better

Y NO GREENLAN?

>>1250178 Consequences of the Australian-American war

>>1301903 Gamers stop giving money to social justice ideologues who hate them because they have battered woman syndrome challenge: impossible.

>>1119252 Call me when Sleeping Dogs 2 releases instead.

>>1301903 >delayed over half a year this late Are games that get a delay this late ever anything a trashfire?

>>1301907 retard

COMEDY GOLD!!! lyl

>>1912577 thirteen years

>>1912577 Normalniggers tearing up!

>>1912577 Any Austin does it again

>>1912577 lol lmao

>>1912577 I have a feeling they know they made a piece of shit and are trying to save their reputation for as long as possible.

>>1912577 This shit probably started off development right at the peak of woke, so around 2018 or 2019-ish, so a ton of keypoints, characters, and world building are baked in with that vibe in mind. Especially now that the Houser brothers are out of the picture. They’ll probably trim a few things here and there, but the core’s staying and there's no fixing that. GTA V and RDR 2 were garbage so i won't hold any hopes up.

>>1914379 >2018 or 2019 I'd say it peaked very clearly in 2020 and bleeding over into 2021 with the strong reaction to George Floyd's death. "Abolish the police" briefly became a mainstream opinion. Either way, the multiple sudden shifts in the Overton Window would be a huge problem for the game's writing if it went that long ago. They either change it or it becomes oddly retrograde, like all the games coming out in the early 2020s with MCU writing long after that went out of vogue. This actually reminds me of how Half-Life 2's story and tone changed significantly late in development, although for different reasons there.

>>1914445 I wouldn't call it an overton window shift as much as that both the left and right are now against zionists intead of petty bullshit like "da woke"

>>1914465 >I like having trannies, faggots and niggers shoved into every aspect of society while anything even slightly beautiful or functional gets removed Yeah, it was just petty bullshit with no consequence dude!

>>1914495 He didn't say that, why are culture warriors like this. Go back to GG

>>1914495 >>1914500 I think anti-woke will die for the same reason as woke: rather than any political action it'll be because its adherents are just fucking annoying.

>>1914521 the whole "anti-woke" bullshit is just retards bitching and compaining for 10 fucking years while getting nothing done. they don't even have a proper political vision other than retvrn to da 90s. bunch of lolbertarian faggot fucktwits. the left has been kicking the right's ass since 1789 and the right still has not learnt jackshit and is going to back to being zionist boomercons ever since Trump got elected.

>>1914465 >both the left and right are now against zionists Damn, son, you know absolutely goddamned nothing.

>>1914445 I wrote 2018 because that’s when RDR2 came out. That’s probably right around the time the story, characters, and missions started getting worked on. It kept going through 2020 and all through Biden’s term until we saw a cultural shift we hadn’t seen in the better part of a decade. I doubt you can radically change the focus and tone of the game in just one year. I'd say they'll either cut out side missions or delete entire dialogues that would otherwise fall flat or feel passé. >>1914521 When’s this e-whore bubble gonna pop? I want them all gone. I hate these people.

>>1914656 oh my bad. the left is agaist zionism while the right is back to sucking jewish cock and got infiltrated by the likes of Laura Loomer, Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, but thankfully people like Tucker and Nick are putting a dent on that. the right can't win with zionists because right now the left have the moral high ground for being against a genocidal state. Trump managed to fuck over the right more than any leftist could.

>>1914656 Maybe he's a retarded uniparty bot lol.

>>1912577 There goes my will to continue on with clown world

>>1914379 Honestly I completely forgot RDR2 came out, I'd lost so much hope in Rockstar as a company by then it just didn't even register in my mind. RDR and UN are probably the last good games they made. >>1914868 If that was your reason to continue in the first place you've got bigger problems, anon.

>>1914728 >the left is against Still wrong. You'll get it someday. Or you won't. >people like Tucker (((the son of a CIA agent))) and Nick (((the big tent multiculturalist))) are putting a dent on that Anon. I'm so sorry. Just stop watching what the scripted media tells you and you'll be a lot healthier.

>>1914905 Cockstar and Take-a-shit-Two can go fuck itself. Ever since the creation of Gta online, They've become nothing but a parody of the greedy companies they make used to make fun of in commercials during previous games. It doesn't help the fact of them hiring jeets and D.E.I. freaks.

>>1912577 This delay happened because they just fired like 50 people for trying to unionize. Understand that while a videogame union is a shit idea, the working conditions at Rockstar are practically slave labor. Recall the minor controversy that happened during rd2 when they tried to gloat about devs working 100 hours per week.

>>1915299 >the working conditions at Rockstar are practically slave labor. Which is why there will never be an LA Noire 2, despite the tech being 100 times easier and cheaper to implement now, and despite the idea being so fucking awesome.

>>1915299 Yeah, but I think the Union won't do much either. If it was someone who actually gave a shit about the industry and the consumer, then I'd be all for it. Although I don't trust the people pushing it right now

lol

>>1917789 RIP lyl, he died

>>1917789 >Another defeat le evil nazis game got delayed Good

>>1918159 I'm fine with nazi killing games, but I wish we had more games that let us kill both the nazis and the commies.

>>1918273 What commercially released singleplayer games let you play as the good guys?

>>1918313 You mean the Americans?

>>1918383 🇮🇱

>>1918401 💩

>>1918407 Well, this IS a GTA thread

>>1918410 True

>>1918313 Feels bad we'll never get a Killzone game where it's 100% pro helghast and you can actually play the campaign from their POV. >>1912577 It'll still be a buggy unfinished mess, guaranteed. .

>>1923486 >it's real

>>1923486 lol lmao even

The biggest problem I have with these games is the campaign. I don't want to have to slowly unlock all the fun for 60 hours stuff for free mode having to role play as a base thug.

>>1923486 >real Ha! Well at least GTA5 won't take as long to release as pic related

gta could be delayed by 2 more years yet people would still dickride rockstars dick and would still end up a huge financial success

GTA is the most overrated, trash franchise there is. All they do is abuse tropes over and over in the writing department and retarded design decisions like you deviating slightly off course to how they want you to play and make you fail the mission because of it. It wasn't good in the early 2000s either, I mean just look at this tank in pic related. How the fuck is this thing supposed to turn? Even if it could turn, it would have the worst turning radius known to man

>>1947077 It was fine in the early 2000s, 3D GTA was pretty much just Driver+ and Vice City and San Andreas were developed very quickly for the amount of content they had. GTA4 is what really didn't improve the mission design in any substantial way, you have a whole sandbox with a fantastic physics system and the missions force you to do everything the devs want by the letter instead of having various ways to finish a mission. It's a fucking insult. >The tank That was made in the last stages of development and it's a literal normal fucking car entity, look at it, the door is still there. It's just a byproduct of the devs trying to put as much content as they can into the game in it's 9 month development. San Andreas had more development time and had much more content, including an actual Tank that looks and works like a Tank.

>>1947094 Again, that would have an absolute shit turning radius, it has the same issue the tank in Vice City had except it might even be worse in this case because it looks like the tires would rub against each other

>>1947105 Those wheels are supposed to mimic tracks anon

>>1947111 Wow a nonretarded looking military vehicle that can actually turn? It's a miracle! That's also not at all what tracks are supposed to look like which means the devs were either incredibly lazy, retarded, or both

>>1947120 >Anon can't understand engine and time constraints Why do you think they try to hide it with the side skirts? >GTA San Andreas >Lazy How fucking old are you?

>>1947122 There have been better games produced in half the time and with a much smaller budget. Kotor and Left for Dead 1+2 are better games without all the retarded design decisions thrown in

>>1947144 Neither are Open World games running on a fucking PS2. Also, L4D gargles almost as much balls as you do!

>>1947147 GTA games are open world games with literally nothing to do in them, kek. Hell even in shit franchises like Far Cry there is more shit to do and you actually interacting with the map fundamentally shapes how the game is played. Fallout New Vegas also got chugged out in a year and is a far superior game than any gta game and it had a smaller budget too. >but muh reused assets! Gta san andreas reused assets from gta vc and 3 too yet despite this, they still too stupid and/or lazy to properly design a game. The gang wars part of the story (literally half of the game or less) in SA was completely pointless and amounted to nothing. GTA and all it's linearity could be made exactly like The Warriors (an actually good game) putting the game into levels instead of a giant empty map and it would be a lot better for it

>>1947187 Sand Andreas, wasn't a buggy mess at launch, that would crash, if you had made too many saves. When you think of New Vegas, you think of the version that had a ton of updates, after it's release, plus the fan patchwork, all those years later, so it's not exactly "chugged out in a year".

>>1947221 NV was still a better game at launch than SA could ever hope to be kek. The only thing SA does better than NV is wasting players time

>accuses me of bait when he's the one baiting lol ok

>>1947094 You're not making any sense. Why would adding more to the tank shorten the development time?

>>1947307 I don't think that's what he is saying. From what I understand, he is claiming that the Vice City tank, was a rushed job, done in the last days of the development cycle, while in San Andreas, they had more time to polish the tank and make it closer to a real tank.

>>1947318 The official reasoning was technical limitations not time restraints. Which I don't believe at all btw because GTA CW had tracks

>>1947322 >The official reasoning was technical limitations not time restraints. It was both >CW Chinatown Wars was made made in like 2 years with a custom engine, it was not using RenderWare.

>>1947503 GTACW was a fucking psp game with much lower system requirements and you are telling us they couldn't figure out a way to put tracks in gta vc/san andreas? Give me a break

>>1947616 What do System Requirements have to do with engine limitations and time constraints? Even the whole team for that game was different, we're talking about a 2009 GTA game post Zelnicks Take2 takeover.

>>1947616 >>1947673 Adding to that: THOSE FUCKING TRACKS DON'T EVEN MOVE IT'S A TOP DOWN GAME How retarded can one be?

>>1947679 >>1947673 Here's the thing though anon, they actually did have tracks in gta sa and it absolutely had nothing to do with technical limitations, all they had to do is just reuse the assets of the rc tiger. As the other anon said, the devs were either retarded or lazy

>>1950047 Much like Chinatown Wars, those tracks don't move!

>>1950732 Tires underneath those tanks wouldn't be able to move either

>>1947094 sa tank is obviously a covert way of britain admitting french designs are superior

>>1950872 kek

2 3 and 4 were the best games in the series. GTA games were always meant to be have a dark gritty hopeless atmosphere. VC and SA were too colorful and happy but they were spinoffs. then V came out and brought this shit into the main series.

>>1954243 >4 >Good Stopped reading

>>1954243 what was wrong about it that isn't about removing dumb useless "features" SA had? it clearly was a big step up from 3. and the things it didn't have they could've just made a real sequel that added to what IV accomplished. but V came out and scrapped everything and was just a shitty remake of SA.

>>1954243 meant for >>1954247

>>1954247 >>1954292

>>1954292 >isn't about removing dumb useless "features" SA had? Stopped reading