>>13972 No, you're right about how it happened. It started out mostly libertarian but the libertarians mostly got chased away by the natsocs after stormfront and shit got shut down. I just thought you were under the impression that /pol/ wasn't always like that.

>>13922 There are a fuck of a lot more vets than there are bernie bros and tankies. I don't particularly care (or at least i didn't at first) about which side in the war is winning, i'm just sick of pro Russian shills and bots spewing obvious lies that prevent any factual conversations about what is going on. Crap like the Moskova or claiming that footage of their own troops being killed are actually Ukrainians thus spitting on their own fallen troops sacrifice. Things like using terrorist scum AKA Chechens to murder their own soldiers. It especially angers me when they take credit for things the KEF did or claim that they aren't getting any help at all, the fact that they either ignore their allies contributions or worse take credit for their sacrifices of braver men than them is particularly repulsive to me. All of these things should be repulsive to any decent person but the mere concept of basic decency doesn't seem to be something the Russian soul is capable of understanding.

>>13983 Dude, chill out. If you want to rant about the racial inferiority of Russians, take that shit back to sharty /k/. I really hope you stick around, because I like you man, but you need to get that we're pretty sick of that sort of behavior here, and we don't want to deal with a screed about the inferior moral character of the Russian people whenever we talk about a Russian weapon or a conflict involving Russia or a Russian ally. >There are a fuck of a lot more vets than there are bernie bros and tankies. lol, you really should check the other refugee thread. A few of the jannies were doxxed and one was a Berniebro. I don't think there have ever been that many vets on /k/. Probably more than there were berniebros and tankies though. >KEF Korean Expeditionary Force? Is that an official name? >getting any help at all, the fact that they either ignore their allies contributions or worse take credit for their sacrifices of braver men than them is particularly repulsive to me. Look man, put up or shut up with proof of North Koreans even being involved in direct combat, much less taking casualties or the nonsense about fucking human wave attacks. I'm not going to get banned for asking that here, so I expect some fucking proof if you are going to keep repeating that horseshit. If you're not going to provide proof then shut the fuck up about it and stop pretending it happened.

>>13989 I have never even mentioned anything about the moral character of Russians until they started flooding the board with the exact same crap you accuse me of doing but about Ukrainians, ranting about biolabs, 100 HIMARs a week, calming obviously sunk ships as returning to port, ect ect. Hearing about evil Jewish Nazi white Supremacist homosexual negro loving KKK NATO super Soldiers eating babies gets old after a while and says more about the people making the accusations than the accused. >KEF I arbitrarily made it up a while ago as the most logical designation and in the lack of any other term got a few other ppl using it, since there was no other term in use i guess by default that is the 'official' term. >put up or shut up with proof of North Koreans even being involved in direct combat, much less taking casualties That would be the North Korean casualties that were captured in direct combat. So far this place seems tp be free of the shilling from both sides so don't fret, hopefully conversations can revolve around weapons and not the moral motivations or lack thereof of the people using them. It's been almost two weeks since the last military related On the Spot Guidance so there will probably be a missile test or other demonstration this weekend. I may do a thread later about the KPAN bringing their new Cruiser out of drydock even though it's only a few satellite images. We can have a grand nitpicking argument over what to call it class wise despite knowing nothing about it.

I'm a vet, but I had pog medical mos.

>>14038 >I have never even mentioned anything about the moral character of Russians until they started flooding the board with the exact same crap you accuse me of doing but about Ukrainians, ranting about biolabs, 100 HIMARs a week, calming obviously sunk ships as returning to port, ect ect. So some shills dropping by and being retarded suddenly means it's acceptable for you to do the same thing? All that shit you are talking about was from the first few months of the war. I don't remember any Russian shills on /k/ beyond a few people who were pretty obviously just trolling you after January 2023 at the latest, but the Ukraine obsessed weirdos continued to be absolutely insufferable for years after they left. >Hearing about evil Jewish Nazi white Supremacist homosexual negro loving KKK NATO super Soldiers eating babies gets old after a while and says more about the people making the accusations than the accused. Yeah, I'm glad it went away after the first few months of the war. I would have been nice if we also stopped hearing about Russian subhuman zigger mongol rape baby gay rapists at the same time. >I arbitrarily made it up a while ago I was just curious. I like the name, I was kinda hoping it was official. I suspect that the DPRK would name it something else though, since I think they'd describe what they're doing as honoring a mutual defense pact with a neighbor and close ally rather than a foreign military expedition. Maybe the Korean International Mission Force? The KIM Force for short. >That would be the North Korean casualties that were captured in direct combat. Can you show me some evidence of that along with proof that they are actually North Korean? You know that Ukraine would love to convince people they are fighting North Korea too, and that there are people in South Korea with the desire and ability to help them fake it. We know that Ukraine was claiming that they were slaughtering thousands of North Koreans who were disguised as Russians before they claimed they captured any, even though I don't even know how Ukraine would have even known they were secret undercover North Koreans when they're dead. The wild fantasies that they are getting into battles with the supposed Chechen blocking detachments and engaging in human wave attacks beggar belief. You know that North Korean forces are highly disciplined and that the storm corps is extremely skilled in infiltration tactics and wouldn't just march across open fields like a bunch of goobers. You have excellent critical faculties, but for some reason you got into the habit of just believing anything negative you heard about Russians, no matter how far fetched, and you'd have eagerly broken your own spine to bend over further backwards to come up with ways to sort of rationalize it. >So far this place seems tp be free of the shilling from both sides so don't fret Yeah, I just wanted you to be clear that you shouldn't sperg out when Russians are mentioned like you sometimes did on 4/k/, since you're not going to find nearly as receptive of an audience here, and we definitely don't want that to attract the sorts of people who would be receptive to that. They can stay on the sharty. >It's been almost two weeks since the last military related On the Spot Guidance so there will probably be a missile test or other demonstration this weekend. I'll keep an eye on KCTV then. My laptop isn't booting right now and I think it's time I switched it to a better Linux distro, but once I get around to fixing it I'm going to get back to spending my evenings with my cat on my lap watching KCTV on my laptop to find that footage of the helical mag in action. > I may do a thread later about the KPAN bringing their new Cruiser out of drydock even though it's only a few satellite images. The board is slow enough that keeping the thread alive until the Cruiser finishes its shakedown cruise won't be hard. It might be wiser to make a North Korea thread though, no need to call it a general, just a thread about North Korean military affairs.

>>14208 Most of what you are saying seems like pro Russian propaganda but i will admit is well thought out and organic, i'll give you that and i respect it. >KEF I invented KEF (Korean Expeditionary Force) out of thin air and hoped it would gain traction which is has to some degree, if you can come up with a better short hand acronym i'd like to hear it. I already thought of DKEF but it doesn't have that DAK swag. Everything else you wrote is demonstrably false besides the Cruiser mention which deserves it's own thread no matter how slow this board is, i shall leave you with a image of Kim Jung Un flagging a guy on a firing range.

>>14228 >Most of what you are saying seems like pro Russian propaganda What does? How much of my post did you actually read? > if you can come up with a better short hand acronym i'd like to hear it. I did come up with one, the Korean International Mission Force, or KIM Force for short. I guess you really didn't read much of my post at all. >Everything else you wrote is demonstrably false If I'm wrong I'd like to have my incorrectness demonstrated to me, but I suspect you are wrong to a greater degree than I. >besides the Cruiser mention which deserves it's own thread no matter how slow this board is Yeah, no question about that, I was just pointing out that when you are making the OP you might want to make it broad enough so we don't feel off topic talking about other DPRK stuff in it. No point in bumping more old threads off the catalog if we can avoid it, it feels disrespectful when they've been there since 2020, and some of them are gold mines of cool information.

>>14233 >I was just pointing out that when you are making the OP I didn't make the OP, why would you think that? There seems to be a fundamental miscommunication here. I like North Korean weapons and think they are really cool, my only 'political' problem with Russia is that i think they are abusing North Koreas support. Besides that i don't really care besides hypothetically imagining the DPRK leveling Vladivostok and doing histories greatest heel turn. I will stand and die on the hill that Russia is abusing and misusing the KEF troops and resources that have been given them. KIM is too obvious, KEF is better.

Please give Juche dictator wife.

>>14270 >I didn't make the OP, why would you think that? You're already drunk aren't you? I said that when you make the thread for the cruiser you should make the thread broad enough so that other discussion of North Korean stuff isn't off topic. >the DPRK leveling Vladivostok and doing histories greatest heel turn. That would be a real folding chair from behind outta nowhere for sure. >I will stand and die on the hill that Russia is abusing and misusing the KEF troops and resources that have been given them. So why won't you provide any evidence that is actually happening? If you're going to die on a hill, make sure it's one you can prove is actually there and isn't just a figment of your imagination and some low effort propaganda. Every time I've asked you for evidence, both here and on 4chan, that it's happening you've just gotten mad instead of just showing me the evidence to shut me up.

>>14274 So your entire argument is that the DPRK isn't involved in the War in Ukraine? That there is no DPRK involvement at all? You seem to be denying >So why won't you provide any evidence that is actually happening? If you're going to die on a hill, make sure it's one you can prove is actually there and isn't just a figment of your imagination and some low effort propaganda. Every time I've asked you for evidence, both here and on 4chan, that it's happening you've just gotten mad instead of just showing me the evidence to shut me up. \>shut me up. Yeah i'll shut you the fuck up: https://google.gprivate.com/search.php?search?q=how+much+north+korean+ammunition+did+russia+get+in+2024

>>14280 >So your entire argument is that the DPRK isn't involved in the War in Ukraine? That there is no DPRK involvement at all? Come back tomorrow when you're sober and re read the thread.

>>14283 No, i reject and rebuke you. This is supposed to be /k/s replacement? A board where it takes FOUR YEARS before a thread is off the front page? Where half the responses are the boards one and only mod sucking his own dick? We are supposed to go from dozens of unique responses to any thread per hour to just 2-3 per day that you allow? This place is utter garbage and everyone modding it needs to die in a fire, you can't even have a conversation on this dead board without the (one) mod and creator trying to bully you. The one thing i have learned from reading three volumes of Kil Il Sung is: Fuck off. This place has one mod/creator and he is half the post count.

>>14290 so leave, then

>>14290 You're drunk and flailing around. I'm not going to argue with you when you're like this, I've learned my lesson. >This place has one mod/creator and he is half the post count. I'm assuming you went through a bunch of old threads, saw that everyone in them was Strelok instead of /k/ommando and thought it was a namefag just spamming. That's not what happened, ask me about it tomorrow when you're sober and I'll tell you the tale. >>14291 Norktard is usually pretty fun, he's drunk right now and I pushed his buttons so he's sperging out. I didn't realize he was drunk when I started, I'm sorry.

>>14295 norktard needs to get a grip, there was some kino shit in that helical mag thread. need more of that around here

>>14297 Thanks, I was pretty proud that my first thread I ever made was decent quality, even if I was a whiny little bitch. My laptop is currently having a bit of a kernel problem, but I'll probably get around to sorting that out tomorrow, and then I'll download a few days of nork tv and watch it with my cat and clip out any interesting bits. I'll make a thread when I have a decent amount of content to open it up with since I have learned that people aren't going to be as excited to spend hours watching North Korean TV to try to find a specific piece of B-roll footage.

>>14291 No. >Come back tomorrow when you're sober and re read the thread. Nice to see you have been paying attention stalker. The fact that you have been following me across 4 separate image boards is vey informative. Here is a hint: I love the DPRK and don't care about much else, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQotKoEBjyk Mi-Hi might quell your misguided rage and help you sleep, her voice is quite soothing:https://studyjuche.com/ >>14295 I noticed that the majority of the posts were 4 years old. >>14297 Which will never happen here due to the lack of a critical mass of experts or more importantly newcomers with fresh insights due to the low user base. Without a mass influx of new users (as well as better moderation) this place is a dead end, we need more than a dozen users a day.

>>14304 >Nice to see you have been paying attention stalker Cheeki breeki >The fact that you have been following me across 4 separate image boards is vey informative. 4? I guess 4chan counts as one, and I did see a post by you when I went to the sharty to drop them some info they probably would've missed in the janny doxxing adventure, and then there is here of course, but what's number 4? Also /k/ is a small board even if you include all the newfags who went to the sharty instead of here, you're pretty recognizable even without a name or tripcode, so people are going to recognize you. >Mi-Hi might quell your misguided rage and help you sleep Take your own advice, you are behaving even worse than you usually do when you're drunk. >I noticed that the majority of the posts were 4 years old. They are, but the story behind that is a tale of a lost tribe from a magical place, a ring that was meant to bind them but was sundered, and a cafe. Ask me about it when you're sober. >Which will never happen here due to the lack of a critical mass of experts or more importantly newcomers with fresh insights due to the low user base. We've got about a hundred people here man. That thread was you, me, and that Caius namefag, he's probably around here somewhere. 4/k/ didn't have many intelligent people, and I'm pretty sure all of them came here, plus one or two retards. Why do you want a bunch of people who just come into a thread, say "based" or "fuck ya mudda" and then leave?

>>14309 I'm slightly cranky due to ILR shit and 4chan going down, this place, swawty and 8kun all suck. I miss the glowies, they had decent ideas. >Take your own advice, you are behaving even worse than you usually do when you're drunk. I'm not drunk (mostly) i'm stoned, i got off a shift volunteering at a food bank then had to move a guy out of his house due to a divorce. I drove 300+ miles today, I think a few edibles are in order. >We've got about a hundred people here man. That thread was you, me, and that Caius namefag, he's probably around here somewhere. 4/k/ didn't have many intelligent people, and I'm pretty sure all of them came here, plus one or two retards. Why do you want a bunch of people who just come into a thread, say "based" or "fuck ya mudda" and then leave? I doubt your claim of 100 active members but given the alternatives i plan to stay here for the moment, i'll try to behave and not Juche out too mech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPFwrH1w468

>>14313 > I miss the glowies, they had decent ideas. I sure don't. >I'm not drunk (mostly) i'm stoned, i got off a shift volunteering at a food bank then had to move a guy out of his house due to a divorce. I drove 300+ miles today, I think a few edibles are in order. I get you, I was genuinely trying to look out for you man. >I doubt your claim of 100 active members You can check the number of unique IDs from the boards list. Most days it hovers between 90 and 105. I think we have about 80 to 100 users and the fluctuation comes from people some people not participating or being counted twice because they used their phone or something.

Do we have any confirmation 4chan is actively being worked on to be restored? The internet without 4chan is incredibly grim in terms of freedom of speech.

>>14396 > The internet without 4chan is incredibly grim in terms of freedom of speech. wdym? 4chan was censored to hell and back, 8chan is much better in those regards.

>>14402 >8chan > implying anyone actually uses that place Shiggy my niggy

>>14409 We are currently using it. Provided that you're not a bot, that makes at least two of us. The boards list says there are 92 unique IDs on this board, although I don't know exactly what that means. It seems to fluctuate from 90 to 110ish, so I think there are about 100 users of this board. We just don't have as many people who feel compelled to make retarded posts in every single thread or make a dozen threads a day with a one sentence OP.

>>14409 I checked out multiple chans and this is what I found: >8kun Dominated by /pol/ and Q-anon shit. >7chan Pretty decent site, but basically dead. Doesn't look like too many refugees ended up there. /x/ and a board dedicated to drugs seem to be the most active. >zzzchan Basically dead. /v/ is the only active board. >endchan A lot of posts in cyrillic and was being spammed with what looked like actual cp. Don't know how common that is or if I checked it at a bad time. >8chan.moe Similar quality to 7chan, but appears that a lot more refugees are making it here.

>>14413 >Pretty decent site, but basically dead. Doesn't look like too many refugees ended up there. /x/ and a board dedicated to drugs seem to be the most active. 7chan was the first place I checked, but it was almost as dead as it was before niggertits died. I think that the number of people who remembered 7chan even existed was pretty small. Not saying an imageboard needs to be fast, but it was just plain dead, not slow. A lot of people knew about 8moe because 8chan was the most popular altchan in the last 10 years. Pretty much the only /k/ refugee who went to 7chan's /w/ is that stupid mick who spams Ukraine's official kill claims in random threads, which feels like going into the ruins of an ancient and once glorious civilization and taking a shit on the floor. https://7chan.org/w/res/15776.html

>>14488 >>14413 Hey, I remember 7chan! Honestly thought it was long dead tho.

>>13013 I just like that I can talk to other vetbros on this /k/ without fucking psyops teams from the third world and mentally ill schizos shitting up all conversation

>>14304 Nork anon you need to be more realistic about your expectations with this website, a lot of anons abandoned 4chan and have been abandoning 4chan for the last 8 or something years. Bots, paid shills and trolls were making up the majority of posters, especially on /pol/ you really only had a small population of holdouts on /pol/ that would never give up the board or trying to use it. This is the organic user base, and more of the original organic user base will come to this website when they figure out that it's the best one via natural selection. I tried like fuckin 12 altchans before coming to this one- tried to make 8kun work because I don't really like the lolicons here, but then realized that its unavoidable. It also doesn't matter either, the more refugees that show up, the more we are going to thrash their loli threads- cause most anons, especially from /pol/ want to grind pedophiles into ration ingredients.

>>14657 > a lot of anons abandoned 4chan and have been abandoning 4chan for the last 8 or something years. Bots, paid shills and trolls were making up the majority of posters Norktard has claimed he used to lurk /k/ back before 2016, but I seriously doubt he lurked all that regularly, given how little he seems to remember of the way /k/ used to be. As far as I can tell I don't think he spent much time on /k/ until 2023ish, in 2024 enough people were recognizing his posts and calling him Norktard that he just adopted the name and started tripfagging. He's got a very distinctive kind of autism that's hard to mistake. I like the guy, but I don't think he really knows what /k/ used to be like. Hell, I started using /k/ after BOOF got banned (I started using /k/ well before the 2016 election though), so I missed the golden age too, and only know about what it was like before then from what leaked onto /b/ and /tg/ back then, and later from screencaps people share of funny threads and stuff. >This is the organic user base, and more of the original organic user base will come to this website when they figure out that it's the best one via natural selection. I bet some old /k/ommandos who left long ago will come back now that the coast is clear. I think we're going to experience a revival the /k/ we all once loved and whose memory was the reason we all kept coming back until the end. It'll take time, I think a lot of people are lurking but not posting much because they are waiting for the board to pick up. If the board picks up a little more I think more people will join in. >I don't really like the lolicons here, but then realized that its unavoidable. I don't get anything out of loli personally, but I like that the lolicons are here since they are chemo against the cancer. People who can't handle loli are moralfags, and moralfags are the biggest lulz killers of all.

>>14719 >I think we're going to experience a revival the /k/ we all once loved and whose memory was the reason we all kept coming back until the end. I doubt it. If 4chan going down wasn't enough of a reason to post, then what could compel these supposed lurkers to start posting now? We're all that's left, anon.

>>14719 Honestly this board reminds me more of /k/ when I started going there in 06-07 than the /k/ of 6 months ago did.

>>14810 I hope we all stay here. There is nothing for us back on 4chan, it was just cancer.

Looking at restored 4chan /k/ and there’s so much Ukraine War shitflinging and calling people shills and thirdies or whatever. This place is nicer even if rather slow. Pic unrelated.