Imo? No, things will temporarily get worse till eventually it reaches a "boiling point" where people and countries are so devastated either by inflation, war, famine, etc that they let the U.N or some other global government type organization take over. We already see the prelude to this in Africa with all the humanitarian aid they hand out and not long ago they made an article about the "benefits of world hunger" in which they discussed how hunger was exploited by business in 3rd world countries for better profits, it sounds asinine at first till you read the whole article and realize the tone and context of the person and organization that made it.

>is there any real chance ,possibility,of there-being a nuclear war within 20-40 years? Yes, but you won't think so unless you are following everything going on. US hegemony made sure nuclear proliferation was out-of-reach, but several countries have already started developing nuclear for "energy needs" in such a way that it can quickly be turned around for bomb production, and nuclear bombs are far easier to produce than most modern guided or large-blast unguided weaponry. Russia's foreign policy is "everyone should have nukes and it is up to their neighbors to stop them if they don't like that" while China's foreign policy is "fuck everybody I want it" which is rapidly radicalizing the rest of Asia towards nuclear proliferation. As America becomes utterly incapable of preventing their enemies from getting nukes, their allies will start developing them, and unless Russia and China get together and agree on a "world council" to replace the UN as they become the dominant economic order (unlikely), someone, somewhere, is gonna get a nuke and use it. Is it going to look like mass-scale ICBMs around the world? Probably not. It will, however, look like a smaller country being invaded by a larger country and having no choice but to use a nuclear deterrent to wipe out a large amount of the enemy all at once to try and collapse the enemy's morale, and at that point it will escalate to countries firing back and forth at each other assuming the world doesn't get boots on the ground to try and stop them.

>>7239 >CBRN ever? Almost certainly. >within 20-40 years Anyone's guess, really. The order's been given at least once before, actually, so there's that; but also worth noting is that it somehow all came down to one random Slav nobody'd ever heard of before (not sure WTF they're doing over there, but this is what I'm told) and the story goes that he straight-up told chain to go fuck themselves, he wasn't doing it. tl;dr I guess we'll find out, won't we?

In a sane world, no nuclear war would occur. We do not live in a sane world.

>>7239 >is there any real chance ,possibility,of there-being a nuclear war within 20-40 years? No. If anyone launches one everyone else will pussy out.

>>7239 I want peace. Make love, not war.

>>7246 >no huge nose Come on, anon.

>>7247 kek but ngl the pictre is cute.

>>7248 Wait until they kiss. Haha

>>59861 It has been happening since 90 years, anonkun.

Teh globohomo always seek excuses for more ghoulish things, and they have degraded capabilities of Airstrip #1 too much, so not impossible. On the nukes, there are too many failsafes. If they even work at all, between all the shit that happened in those national labs and problems with procuring Plutonium for probes (which shows breeding reactors don’t work reliably). Also, have jumped the gun already with a bioweapon. Which achieved little beyond making everyone more ready for another shoe to fall. Of course, since it had to be outsourced to China back then, by now any R&D on this subject is likely more dead than alive. Restoring these capabilities without an immediate disaster being the most likely outcome is only theoretically possible. In that this would require swinging an axe at the affirmative action hires and everything that stands behind them… a lot. Yeah, good luck with that. Anyone else does not really need such risks, simply because everyone’s strategical threat #1 is the zombie of Uncle Sam, everyone gets this (even India and China allied), and currently the best weapons against it are its own numerous cancers and other effects of entropy.

>>7251 >Restoring these capabilities without an immediate disaster being the most likely outcome is only theoretically possible. In that this would require swinging an axe at the affirmative action hires and everything that stands behind them Could be done in a few months, a year tops. The useless idiot puppets are far easier to remove than most normalfag think as A. 99% of media and news make them seem like divine untouchable beings regardless of how useless and degenerate they are, and only really super radical leftists care when shtf as chaz demonstrated perfectly and B. they wouldn't be used if the jews/cult thought there was a chance in hell they might hurt them like whites did in the past. Again, the number 1 reason for the anti-white shit is for self-preservation not inclined racism/neurotic sadism, they are going after whitey first because we are the biggest threat and all the poc golems are all bark no bite. The only real problem with america is that there is next to no problem that is actually caused by natural entropy or cancer and its all artificially done by jews and co in order to destroy america, its obvious to anyone who looks hard enough but the few who do don't have the balls to do anything about it. Until people like us strelo/k/s grow the balls to manipulate the proles into actually going against those putting the holes in the ship, worrying about fixing them is a non-issue, same as prepping or going innawoods. None of that shit will matter when the world ends and the hords or feds come upon you like locusts, using the proles to fight back like every successful movement in human history is the only way to survive.

>>7252 >last man in yurope It's pretty funny seeing eric blaire's brainrot repeated almost verbatim in a call to action against his platform. At least pick someone who can write third acts to ape for your muh oppressed yte narrative

>>7253 Can I get a cheeseburger?

>>7253 Nigger.

>>7254 With or without cheese?

>>7256 Without burger

>>7252 >99% of media and news make them seem like divine untouchable beings regardless of how useless and degenerate they are Thus, this would include butchering (figuratively or literally) 99% of media, plus those who coordinate them. > if the jews/cult And here we see a bigger problem: even those willing to jump on this bandwagon are going to fight not even windmills, but hallucinations. Perhaps the first thing that would need to be cleaned are medical units capable of administering hemodialysis? It's the same reason why Trump could not make a bid for real power and transcend the negligible force against the insubstantial object BS contest. Lots of cheerleaders, almost no useful cadres (willing and able). And if Trump on the peak of popularity could not pull this, no half-assedly repainted “opposition” digging forgotten forced memes out of landfills with the help of Quillette will be able to pull it either.

>>7258 Do you mean impossible to preserve the Weimarican government or to supplant it?

>>7239 Getting better all the time... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Lmoq0i4uDA (Russia, 1995) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mglpxNid5sc (USA, various)

>>7239 why did my infographics get whacked?