>>1771731
>you are looking a bit too hard into what is just the standard horny in this specific case
Although others may prefer not-Hornet for other reasons the trend still feels at least partially artificial knowing what payment processors have been doing. Additionally, if any artists that draw Hornet that way have also recently drawn super-petite characters or, VISA and MasterCard forbid,
LOLI , then I'd buy the excuse that they simply prefer not-Hornet or are exploiting an internet trend for attention, otherwise I'd question if they're just cucking out to this "petite = underageB&" bullshit to be able to monetize their work.
>>1771752
Well, at least it exists. You'd almost be convinced it didn't when an overwhelming majority of fan art lewds aren't even trying to be anything but a fabricated headcanon.
>>1771776
>1776
Patriotic get. WEBM-related.
I'm not even that into
furry and scaly monstergirls, but as mentioned
>>1767989 I AI-generated Hornet just to see her proportions
somewhat closer to the actual character. I do understand skewing things to make a simplistic cartoon more fappable, but Hornet is just not a tiddy monster and it's mildly annoying to see her drawn waay off-model to an extent that is monopolizing.
For a lazy analogy, imagine you walk down a street & every house is painted red. You might ask why or point to a barn which red paint is more suited for. I mean, it's not impossible to paint a house red, yet it is odd that it had to become an overwhelming trend. You find that many who painted their houses other colors lost their income, and you're told that actually some people just preferred a red house, but that's the "schizo" layer of what's happening so you can't bring that up.
Thankfully, AI solves this. We're not at the mercy of cucked artists. We don't have to age-up or add huge tits to characters to remain on major platforms where the large audience with deep pockets reside. We can AI generate any damn thing we want. (at least until regulators fuck it all up)