>>1607660 I wasted ALL my resources on this deck, and i have absolutely no desire to take it to ranked, even though it should be possible for even a godawful player like me to make it to master V effortlessly, can you believe that? I always stop at gold I so i can derank to silver V and collect my easy monthly gems. These days i only build new decks if my dick tells me to. I got some white forest and snake-eye URs from the fiendsmith pack that i still haven't dusted, so i guess that one is next. What i really want to play however is labrynth, she's one of the most gorgeous duel monsters ever and it's a backrow-centric deck ie relatively simple to pilot (unless i purposefully meme it up with SEC), but its secret pack sucks (it's 50% destiny board) and it's VERY expensive for some reason. Maybe i'll build it once we get the alt art.

Misaki best girl. Watt support when?

>>1607660 IT'S TIME TO D-D-D-D-D-D-D-DUEL

>>1607660 what's the opinion on the new Miasma Necromancer and dark magician support i don't think it will be better than maliss or ryzeal but i am very happy to see it.

>>1609310 It's okay. Has a lot of caveats that hold it back, but it paves the way for some more combos and gives you back what you need. Gives Chaos Max Magician some use. Archetype is still leaps and bounds behind Blue-Eyes though.

>>1611201 i am more exited for what it can do for shining sarc than dark magician, i really do feel sarc is just a few new cards away from being just as good as blue eyes.

>>1611616 DMG retrain is a good card that helps in the consistency department in case your first normal summon doesn't work out. Not sure Miasma is much help, considering it dumps spells instead of searching them to get to your spellcasters. I feel Shining Sarc really needs more protection for their signature card in order to maintain a stronger presence, as even with the monster protection, I find the card easy to deal with. And it'll especially be easy in the coming days if Magnifistorming gets more support. More consistency for it wouldn't hurt either. Then again, I don't play the deck, so I'm not a big expert on all the ins-and-outs. Other nostalgia decks catch my attention a bit more.

So I have a deck concept I've been wanting to run for a while, one that might actually beat any deck in the meta. Thoughts? :^)

>>1611616 As a sarc player, the deck feels pretty consistent thanks to dmg taking the load off of gadget trio. You can even use berry magician girl if you want more starters. The new dark magician support lets you get a one card combo Dragoon off of dmg too so that's something to look forward to. The deck just needs more extenders imo. Something you can get off of ties that bind since both silents are good, but not always what you need. And Gandora is a super weak boss monster that can't even otk with a full board wipe.

Nice to see a YGO thread on /v/ anyways I wanted to ask if sky striker is still worth making in the current format of MD or wait for their new support (in more or less next year) after trying it out, I honestly love it but still unsure if I'm gonna make the most of it if I start making the deck now

>>1613399 >ys I wanted to ask if sky striker is still worth making in the current format of MD or wait for their new support (in more or less next year) plenty of people can still get them to master so yes even if it's not meta if you like the deck build it.

>>1613399 Same as above said. If you're skilled or persistant enough you can climb to Masters with it. Even if there are plenty of better rouge decks at the moment (ex: Fire King, Spright, D/D/D, Ice Barrier (as funny as that feels to say), Voiceless Voice, etc.) I stick to playing what I enjoy, just don't expect to get too many wins out of it at the start. And make sure to stock up on those Chaos Hunters and Artifact Lanceas.

>>1612687 Actually some already built peak yugioh last year, it was 3 cyberse gadget, 3 engraver, 2 lacrima, 1 tract, 1 lurrie and 30 handtraps.