>>1636
The issues with the show are mostly due to how it takes a big fat shit on Fallout 1, 2, and New Vegas. If you never played the games or only played Bethesda's games it wouldn't surprise me if you liked the show or at least found it okay.
Thus it wouldn't surprise me if Drinker liked the show as he's not a videogames guy, and thus wouldn't understand lore autism like the ghoul juice being a bad change, the enclave somehow returning being bad, the BoS wankery being a continuation of Bethesda fallout BS, Shady Sands getting nuked in 2277 retconning New Vegas because the NCR would've imploded into civil war due to the panic and power imbalance, The trio of vaults prominent in the show not getting discovered and wrecked by the Master's armies despite being direct open-air vaults with one even opening to fucking beachfront, Gun Runners being nowhere, Mr. House getting retconned massively and character assinated, Bethesda's soft reboot in 4 being carried over to the west coast with this show being canon (in a bad way with the terrible aesthetic changes and gun designs), Bethseda trying to force the series into being post-apocalyptic across the board when Fallout 1/2/NV are post-post-apoc, etc. But, I don't think Drinker's review is legit due to the opening being near 1-to-1 with ggmanlives's shill video on Starfield. It reeks of that under-the-table money kind of shit and while he's not exactly known for that it wouldn't surprise me if he took a deal with this one. Also could be a case of him just being a fanboy of Westworld S1 and this show just being post-apoc Westworld before the non-simulation parts shat up the show in later seasons alongside the directors shoving in a ton of female and minority empowerment BS.