New 2d duke games would be cool.

>>28828 Yeah I think so too. I never hear anons talk about the first two games, it's always Duke 3D. I know some of them must have played DN1 or 2.

>>28829 I played the shareware version of duke 1 as a kid. Loved that game.

>>28831 If you haven't already, try Duke 2. It's pretty great as well.

>>28824 Those are called platform games you faggot. And while those platformers are action games, they sure aren't adventure games. They don't fit the criteria of the adventure videogame genre. Also, Gearbox owns Duke IP now. It's fucked.

>>28859 >Those are called platform games you faggot. Yes I'm aware of what platform games are. I was meaning something more specifically similar to that particular era of DOS games. Or a 3D remake/spiratual successor. Duke 2 is a more conventional action platformer but Duke 1 is basically a 2D collectathon. >Also, Gearbox owns Duke IP now. It's fucked. I know. Fucking Randy!

>>28866 >Duke 1 is basically a 2D collectathon. Wait, are you referring to that genre that was popular with Eurojank Amiga trash "Where the fuck do I go?" types of games? Just go look up Amiga games. There were zillions like you describe. And many were ported to other consoles, sometimes with slight upgrades, though not enough to make them good games.

>>28877 When I called Duke 1 a collectathon I didn't mean that as an insult. It is an action platformer, with a few upgrades. What I meant there was a ton of different optional scoring items. It kind of encourages exploration in what whould have otherwise been a relatively straightforward DOS platformer. >Eurojank Amiga trash "Where the fuck do I go?" types of games? But isn't that just 20 different Dizzy sequels?

>>28824 The people nostalgic for it now are old farts too senile to make videogames

>>28902 If that were true then people wouldn't be making games for the NES, Spectrum, or the Commodore original hardware. And even the Atari sometimes.