/k/ - Weapons

Weapons, tactics, and more

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)
Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

/wsj/ - Weekly Shonen Jump

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.
(209.58 KB 936x497 aft.png)

ATF Running Background Checks Retroactively /k/ommando 07/03/2021 (Sat) 10:15:33 No. 212
>In the conference call, the ATF leadership asked its Industry Operations Inspectors (IOI) to collect information on the customers that used concealed carry permits instead of obtaining a background check through the NICS. The purpose of obtaining this information would be to run the customer’s data through the NICS to see if the customer would have received an approved or denied status. In addition, the IOI will pass on the names and information of customers denied by the NICS to the criminal branch for a special agent to follow up. https://www.ammoland.com/2021/07/new-leaks-shows-atf-running-background-checks-on-gun-buyers-retroactively/ On a related note. Feds are convening grand juries to go after people charged/convicted on STATE level gun charges (prohibited possessor and whatnot). "Dual Supremacy" allows them to level practically identical charges as your state charges for the same incident. Here's an example that caught my attention: original state charges: https://anonfiles.com/n4G3s642uf/MdjDocketSheet_pdf a year later the feds jump in: https://anonfiles.com/TfF2s64dub/fedcomplaint_pdf Presumably, they're scouring the state records for easymode gun convictions (states already did the work for them). I can't think of any other reason why they'd bother to convene a GJ for a methbilly who's already being convicted.
/k/ommando 07/03/2021 (Sat) 10:18:49 No. 213
>>212 Holy fucking shit. The gun grabbing has accelerated.
/k/ommando 07/03/2021 (Sat) 10:33:34 No. 214
>>212 Well thats one way to make sure they have a national gun registry. Motherfuckers.
/k/ommando 07/03/2021 (Sat) 10:37:49 No. 215
>>213 indeed. everyone knew they'd eventually start exploiting databases, but they're doing it in earnest now. seizing the p80 customer lists and crosschecking them off a database of prohibited persons is another recent example. https://thecrimereport.org/2021/06/14/ghost-gun-firm-gets-covid-aid-after-atf-raid/
/k/ommando 07/03/2021 (Sat) 10:53:55 No. 216
>>215 Fucking hell. P80s were always a canary. And it sounds like the bitch aint singing so hot.
/k/ommando 07/04/2021 (Sun) 01:01:06 No. 222
(57.04 KB 960x720 suckhisdickAmerica.jpg)

Very well.
/k/ommando 07/06/2021 (Tue) 11:35:49 No. 227
(4.00 MB 828x598 chipman.mp4)

>>222
/k/ommando 07/06/2021 (Tue) 19:52:11 No. 228
>>227 >hate filled website Well that's not biased. Hey any reporters present check this out >>>/c/
/k/ommando 07/06/2021 (Tue) 20:55:51 No. 229
>>227 >don't currently have the authority to remove weaponry just because people are saying hateful things >do not currently have the authority >currently Implying that in the future that will be different. Well whether they decide that is legal or not. Is irrelevant. It is beyond any debate unconstitutional. Redflag laws are currently not being enforced in a variety of Sanctuary Cities and there have been a slew of law enforcement officials, Mostly sheriffs, who have declared themselves to be in opposition to any federal attempt to enforce such unconstitutional laws. If one wished for a civil war such a situation presents just such a powderkeg. Very dangerous territory. Personally I wish for peace and urge the government to watch the overreach before it goes too far, and something happens that cannot be undone.
/k/ommando 07/06/2021 (Tue) 20:57:41 No. 230
>>212 It’s always disturbing news when the feds decide to flex its muscles. Typical overreach.
/k/ommando 07/06/2021 (Tue) 22:14:06 No. 231
>>229 Could be interesting >FBI releases UCR >cite said crime stats on Faceberg >get banned for hate speech online >get vanned IRL by FBI
/k/ommando 07/06/2021 (Tue) 22:19:25 No. 232
>>231 Yep. Gonna be very interesting.
/k/ommando 07/12/2021 (Mon) 14:13:22 No. 297
Speaking of background checks/registration - if the BAFT deems slides to be "firearms" isn't that going to create a fuckton of duplicates in their registry? Glock factory slides have been selling like crazy on the secondary market for at least a decade. It wasn't just homebuilders buying them up, I personally know a few competition shooters who bought them to have rmr cuts milled before it was a factory option (this was practical when oem slides were only $300). The whole thing just seems like they're going to unintentionally taint their own databases by trying to expand it - probably by 10s of thousands of examples based on the volume some sellers were/are moving and I'm only talking about one brand (Glock).
Index Catalog Archive Top Reply
9
Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply