>>55489
>The thread existed primarily to ragebait sage anyway.
All the more reason to double down on it IMO. If it keeps Sage spinning his wheels it unshits the rest of the board and is moderately entertaining, not necessarily because of the cringe (or lack of it,) but because it's pissing off Sage. I said this ages ago, but I have no interest in the cringe thread and am fine with it dying. At least I had no interest in it until Sage took the bait, now I want it at the top of the board solely to infuriate him, not because I give a damn about having a cringe thread.
>>55490
>So BO confirmed to both just be capitulating to what Sage jackass tells him while also completely ignoring the board for weeks at a time.
I think this is what bothers me the most about everything I'm reading here right now. Sage already told you his goal was disruption, and then at some point claimed it was to be BO making himself Lord of the Diaper Spergs, King of the Diaper Coomers, and first of his name. Failing that, his goal was to make BO his puppet in effect becoming BO by proxy, which is frustratingly what it appears he has no achieved. (And yes this still means that his goal has been disruption the entire time. It's never changed despite the BS he's spewed lately.) Now I don't believe anything that comes out of Sage other than that his goal is disruption since he keeps proving it, but at least at one point he claimed that everything he's said on here is a lie and that there were no domestic violence charges against old BO, and that Sage just made that up as a way to turn the board against him. It's likely BS, but if it's truly it probably means that old BO got sick of Sage's shit and just decided to let someone else deal with him, which is probably what Sage wanted since he likely realized he could just push over the next BO if he didn't say "how high" whenever Sage said "Jump!"
NumberNine has made it clear that he isn't really interested in dealing with this place daily, which is part of the problem. It's clearly active enough to need daily moderation, and I suspect Sage's current plan to cause disruption here is to just shit up the place until NumberNine throws his hands up and quits as BO or the GMs remove him and suspend the board until a new BO can be found, at which point Sage will likely attempt to become BO, which is exactly what we *do not want*.
>>55495
> If you fucking anons can't stop taking the bait and continue to turn this place into politics roleplaying like some leftypol qanon shithole. I might start considering if this board should mainly focus on art, stories and avoid threads that easily lead to boomer level politics.
Do you think this is really going to stop Sage? He's just going to shit up those threads, bring the politards out of the woodwork in them, and drive away people who actually want to have a damn discussion, download some porn, and maybe are interested in the kind of stuff that's allowed here but typically not offered elsewhere. If it's just going to be art and stories that can be found everywhere else, you might as well just torch this place now BO. The entire reason this board is interesting is that it isn't just the same shit that's on Reddit and the three wannabe ADISCs that have popped up after that cancer was removed.
>This place shouldn't need to be moderated multiple times by me or the GMs and admin on a daily basis.
It shouldn't but it clearly does. Tide pods shouldn't have to be coated in warnings telling people not to eat them, but they do because stupid people kept putting them in their mouths. I shouldn't have to show my ID to buy compressed air to clean a computer, but I do because addicts kept using the shit to get high. We collectively shouldn't have to wade through Sage's shit, but here we are. The board shouldn't need daily moderation, you're right about that, but it unfortunately does. Why not just appoint a janny already and call it a day, as has been suggested countless times?
>As for the deleted cringe thread, it was trashed which only happens when either I or the OP decides to delete a thread or post.
I checked the logs and don't see anything about
>>55463 in them on the two days in November for which logs exist. There is GM activity in the old cringe thread, specifically a report closure on
>>55460 which was likely Sage trying to get the GMs to close that thread too with the GMs simply closing the report.
>>55496
>BO, why not just ban overt political discussion entirely or at least enable IDs as >>55066 suggested?
I can't remember if it was me or someone else, but earlier in the thread someone asked how IDs would prevent Sage from doing his thing when he's always using the site via TOR? Wouldn't his ID just change every time he ban evades and changes nodes?
BO doesn't need to ban political discussion and I'm actually against that as it's one of the things that makes this place interesting when it's between sane-ish people and not the trolls. Why not just create an AB/DL political discussion thread and then delete any political discussion outside of that thread? If you're afraid the trolls will just use it to Ragebait, create one for left and right leaning ideologies and then purge any posts from the obvious ragebaiters. The point of 8chan is free speech and only the necessary amount of moderation. Cutting part of that off goes against the ethos of this place. (Nuking ragebait is however necessary moderation.)
>Judging from the text and post style it's only few Anons samefagging while ceaselessly spamming and taking the repeated obvious bait.
So let them circlejerk each other and call it a day, just give them their own little playpen to do it in so they're not shitting up the other threads, including the controversial ones. I don't care that they're circlejerking, I care that it's spilling out of the board's diaper formerly known as the cringe thread.
>At the very least can you keep the political nuts to one or two threads? Just ban any political nonsense outside those threads if not banning it entirely.
I'd be fine with, and am all for containing it to one or two threads like mature adults. I'm not cool with banning it entirely though. We're not Reddit.
>>55503
This is exactly what would happen if a no political discussion ban were implemented here, and this place would be no better than Discord or Reddit. We don't need another hugbox circlejerk for people whose only life skill is kissing an edgelord's ass. This is sort of how old BO ran things and it was a mess. I'd rather have the trolls than have this place be one where people can't say what they really think. Besides, political discussion directly affects ABDLs. The tariffs on China have directly impacted which ABDL and ABDL-friendly medical diapers are or aren't sold into the USA as one example, as well as certain ABDL diaper manufacturers no longer offering free shipping or only offering it on large bulk orders. Price increases related to those tariffs have also occurred, with Tykables openly acknowledging that the tariffs were at fault. All of that is political stuff, but it's political stuff that affects ABDLs. The second political discussion gets banned we won't be able to discuss this as an issue for us. The people who want political discussions banned are usually the ones who are mostly on the losing side of the debate, which is why I'm against this. I am however in favor of removing it from threads where it exists to disrupt, which shouldn't be controversial because we'd remove other off topic posts that exist to disrupt.
>>55515
>I don't have an issue with political discussion itself I have an issue with the obsessed polititard autist that apparently has nothing better to do than spam about how much he hates anyone who doesn't agree with him.
Based! This is really the issue though, it's one fag (Sagefag without his nametag) shitting up the thread. There are probably five others who are poking the bear and giving it back to him, (and deservedly so,) but if he's gone they wouldn't be bothering. They're doing it because it pisses off the troll and as a bonus, keeps his crap in the cringe thread instead of letting it spread across the site. Now that there's no cringe thread, the shit is spreading again.
[Expand Post]
>I would have the same problem with the constant derailing spam even if wasn't political.
Exactly, and if we got rid of political discussion Sagefag or his wannabe Samefag doppleganger on the off chance the politard isn't him would just pick something else to spam the thread with. It's obviously Sagefag though because he pulled the same thing in a previous video thread where he apparently posted real abuse material and the GMs nuked it. That was after he was ragebaited and couldn't beat the encryption for about a week before he eventually figured it out. He's just going to spam with different shit. If BO makes this an art and story thread, he'll just fill it with AI slop stories that are off topic and memes that could vaugely be considered art an keep shitting up the place. The problem isn't political discussion, it's one troll and BOs tissue-level rejection of just appointing a janny to deal with that troll, despite the entire board and apparently the GMs practically screaming at him to do just that.
By the way Sage, since I'm sure you're beating your nuts off to this thread right now. /abdl/ on Endchan is currently unclaimed after BO took over here. Why don't you fuck off over to there or 8kun and do what you claim you wanted to do and create your own board. Go ahead, I dare you. I really want to see what the world's most dead ABDL board looks like, or how you enjoy it when the people here start shitting up your board. You have 24 hours or I'll just assume you're too much of a chickenshit to do anything other than cause chaos here. Beat us in the marketplace of ideas, you know, if you can.