>>8450 nowhere unfortunately. it takes at least a small amount of computational power to process your "sale" and that's what the gas fee covers no such thing as free lunch nigger

>leaning from books >not just writing whatever comes to mind until it compiles

>>8816 >until it compiles WE COMPILER NOW

>>8816 >not having it compile on the first try ngmi

>>10615 A lot of the websites you mention are javascript heavy, and probably require relatively recent CSS / HTML standards. The standards for websites have changed, and are probably not supported by Windows XP IE.

Issue you have is working between HTML 1 to 2, and the modern internet now using some HTML 5. Javascript was fairly young, CSS having developed further over the years. Drop IE, or accept that the world is moving past W 98 on IE. There are more clever monkeys then me that know how to get that shit working on W98. But they would also tell you it is a bad idea to use w98 on the internet.

I'm someone who use FF 42 (2015). I watch as 1 by 1 sites I use become inaccesible. But it is funny seeing some sites still survive despite supporting old browsers. This thread look fun

Insightful post questioning the most established members in the current privacy community.

lmao

Saying kys in twitter suspend my account and it require phone number to unsuspend it

>>10695 >they couldn't get past the sadpanda oh that is rich

Just a reminder that the man heading this shit recently fell down the stairs and shat himself.

>>10821 Good thinking; like a cherry on top!

>>1835 cpu is overkill for such a shitty gpu, that shit was a budget card 5 years ago also get a better case, any budget corsair should do

>>3141 >Put in a fan on the bottom to vaccuum up dust bunnies retard

>>7286 >that shit was a budget card 5 years ago this thread is from 5 years ago

>>9801 I imagine tails / linux would be your answer since it can pass everything over tor, even if you're not using tor browser. I think even on debian you can create a virtual network interface that actually is connected to tor

>>9125 You can still do it. This is a shitty Wolfenstein-style game that I wanted to share on AGDG.

And, it ate my BMP

>>10534 I mean, you can only pass around that much data via torrents reliably. And theoretically you can create a veracrypt container with the data, then create the torrent and give the password to whomever you want

yea i think

Q PREDICTED THIS!!!!! Q SAID THE VACCINE IS THE KEY THE VACCINE MAKES YOU SUPERHUMAN AND ANYONE NOT VACCINATED WILL DIE FROM THE VIRUS RELEASED BY THE SPACE FEDERATION TRUMP KNEW THIS! THATS WHY HE MADE THE SPACE FORCE AND STARTED PROJECT WARP SPEED TO SAVE HUMANITY TRUMP LITERALLY= SAID THE VACCINE IS MAGA== THE VACCINE IS BASED AND REDPILLED MAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>7599 Qtard

>>10269 I always thought it would be need if the guide was customisable. Like you can customise which sections are visible so you don't find your self getting side-tracked by options not for your own install. Like an installer for the guide of the user instead of the OS. Overall, archwiki is based.

>archinstall even with new function, not being able to install there is fucking even hahahahhaha

>>8442 yep, I installed it a month ago manually. its awesome

Better question is why not? Most people don't know what USENET is or how to use it, so it inherently caters to a specialty crow. And NNTP allows for things to be propagated and mirrored out to a more local network so it's like a crude approximation of a cloud or a torrent. Remember direct downloads over IRC? Same idea. There's enough bandwidth to spare by sharing the load, and it's less annoying than having to get caught up in the right IRC and navigating all the attendant drama to get access to the right XDCC bot.

>>10443 > allows for things to be propagated and mirrored out to a more local network Well, technically yes, but actually for bin newsnet that doesn't work. I would say ~20 providers host alt.bin. I can safely assume you won't have 100+tb host in your local network. >over IRC? I guess telegram channels have taken over that role. I'm not good with telegram, use it only as a messenger. But my wife managed to get some rare book there. > Better question is why not? Please don't get me wrong, I'm happy when things are diverse and one has an option to choose from. It just looks strange to me that decentralized technology used for content piracy tends to be less popular than centralized one. For some particular cases. And I'm trying to understand what are those cases.

>>10444 >my wife super gross Why do people use dead chans? Maybe some people like them. There's your answer.

>>10288 >>What program do you use? >Yeah that was the entry level hump trying to get over so I could compile it and look at the results before passing the next version along. I'm as much a copy editor as an idea man for what we should be writing. There is - TEXmacs https://www.texmacs.org/ - vim - emacs has tex-mode Really any text editor will do. For the proprietary vener-lock-in web-app feel maybe <https://www.overleaf.com/>.They do have good documentation for beginners.

>>10298 lol the emacs tex mode sucks as much unwashed cock as most of its other modes, and that's after you try to write hooks in your .emacs or .xemacs or ~/.emacs/.xmacstab or whatever to just force it in to text mode. Yes I do know ML and I don't care. They can't even keep anything consistent between emacs and xemacs, but you wind up falling between either than and vim, and I'll give you an earful about it not being part of a standard distribution DESPITE ALL THIS OTHER BULL SHIT I DIDN'T NEED OR WANT TO KNOW ABOUT but it's the compilation thing. I'ts kind of like making your own .deb or .rpm. I like how you can just trade it around as a pure text file, but you have to do some digging for the right incantation to turn it in to the final product, and that's important if your chart wound up on the wrong page, or if you have to edit down your list of citations to fit it in to the number of pages you paid for.

>>408 >I'd rather have a solution that a) is FOSS and b) runs in my own 'puter https://github.com/kensj/simple-latex-table-generator https://github.com/OlDenis/Latex-table-maker https://github.com/jermp/latex_table_maker https://github.com/skwzrd/LaTeX-table-maker https://github.com/emd5310/LaTeX-table-maker

>>10078 I think you can still (2022) run KDE with Xorg. How else can BSD users use KDE. BSD does not have wayland. Also last time I used wayland screen recording didn't work; so the project seems like an overambitious cluster fuck funded by Ford automobile to make low energy info-tainment system gui.

>>10285 You *can* run KDE on Xorg, but in my opinion the only reason to use KDE in the first place is if you want Wayland but dislike Gnome and Sway. If you're gonna be on Xorg anyway, might as well use a better DE like LxQt

>>10285 >the project seems like an overambitious cluster fuck Wayland is to Linux what DWM was to Windows. There were plenty of growing pains but I don't think most Windows users want to go back to GDI at this point.

HE!1!!!!!!11!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111!!11 KEK!! KEK!! KEK!! WHATA FUCK MAN xD i just fall of my chair cuz i couldnt and i CANT stop laugh xDXDXDXD FXDDFDFDD XXXXXZXZDZDDFDFDD OMGOSH XXXXXDD LOOOOLLLLL THIS IS A SHIT XDDDD DDDDD DDDDDDDDDDD XDDDD A BIG ONE XDDDD DDD A GRAT ONE XXX XXXDDDD CONGRATS MAN XD DDDD DXXXX XDDD DDDD DDDD LOOOOOOOLLLLL FUCKIN HOLY SHITTTT I CANT JUST STOP LAUGHING CAUSE HE HE HE HE HE JUST TO FUNNY MAN!!!1!11! LOL XDXDXDXDXD I JUST LITERALLY PEED MY PANTS JUST A LITTE THOUGH I MEAN ITS A LITTLE SPOT NOT LIKE IT RUINED MY CHAIR OR NYTHING LOL BUT FOR REAL EPIC LULZ HIGH FIVES XDDDD DDDDDDDDDD