>>20933 It more or less does, here it is at 12px (the last one was 48px) with a regular bitmap atlas for comparison. You can start noticing some flitering fuckery going on when you scale it up. I think I saw that you can mitigate a bit it by using multiple channel sdf's, so I might look into that later. Also i realized that i wasn't scaling the glyph bearing properly, so I fixed that here. >That makes me nervous, almost gpu coil whine levels. Don't worry, i just uncapped the framerate so i can see where the limits are in my shitty third worlder pc with integrated graphics (so no coil whining either kek).

>>18522 Glacial speed progress update - slow down I'm going too fast edition: kinda able to load multiple meshes from gltf files into my shitty scene graph.

>>21511 Glacial speed progress: half working texture loading. For some reason I can't figure out it only works for loading directly from an image file but when I try to load the texture data from gltf I only get garbage.

Should I get a Tex Shinobi or Kodachi when they come back in stock? I really like the clitmouse but I don't want to give Lenovo any money since their build quality sucks now and too many pajeets work for them. Are there any other alternatives to this and the Lenovo clitmouse keyboard (BT)? >usecase? I plan on nigger-rigging a RISC-V deck that will be my daily driver. >Budget Low-ish >Location North America >Preferred switch type something that lets me type fast, accurately and quietly, quiet typing being the most important consideration for me >Layout ANSI, I can't type without a THICC L-shift key >Form factor 60-100%. I like having volume control without having to search for a Fn key, but I don't need the numpad often and I hardly use the F keys >Backlight Don't care as long as it's not RGB and doesn't increase the price. I can type without light and if I need it, the keyboard screen is enough light >Previous/current keyboards stock Dell keyboard that came with desktops in the late 2000-2010s. current is a thinkpad laptop, doesn't have a numpad

>>22154 oops, I was drunk and sleep deprived. by keyboard screen I mean monitor

For me, it's the logitech k845 with linear switches.

>>22209 (OP) is that asmongold? that nigga been on my mind since I barebacked him in a Boca Ratton Airbnb

>>22082 (OP) also if you have source-highlight installed you can actually pipe it through that for some basic syntax highlighting which is neat

>>22177 I use it to write full files too. It takes a bit to master the write-edit errors-write cycle but it's really not any less efficient than using vim. >>22179 While I do have it on other editors, syntax highlighting is massively overrated and things like tree-sitter are solutions to a problem that should not exist in the first place.

how to learn ed

>>21862 (OP) It's because of interface convergence, everything needs to be operated by touch. Current touchscreen codified gestures don't have a procedure for opening a floating hidden menu and never will because touchscreen are designed with literal retards in mind as end users.

>>21862 (OP) If it has mousewheel click you can use that to open new tabs.

>>21996 Alright, whats a transmitter you'd recommend matching it with and how much is it going to set me back?

>>21998 That depends on how much you're willing to spend and how far you wanna go out. The unfortunate truth though that I've only just realized now is that your receiver only has the AM mode, when most hams nowadays for voice use a mode called SSB which AM receivers can pick up only in a distorted way. You may need to look into either somehow modifying the receiver to give it SSB support or you may have to rely on the transceiver for SSB communications. I'm not entirely sure what you need to switch between a receiver and a transceiver when you push to talk mind you, I'm just assuming you can do it with any. The typical "budget" transceiver is gonna be the chunk Xiegu G90, which only gives you about 20 watts of power and 5 watts with AM. Unfortunately, 5 watts with AM is gonna get you near-nowhere. A new G90 is gonna set you back about $500 or so including a cheap lithium battery for a couple hours of use before recharging. If you want more power, the ICOM 7300 has 100 watts SSB/25 watts AM, which would set you back about a grand not including power supply. If you want to talk on AM effectively you're likely gonna need an amplifier to increase your output power as high as possible. Good luck and sorry for not being able to tell you earlier bro.

>>22137 I'll just keeping looking in the various buildings on my property and inevitably something as retarded as this will turn up, it's not fun unless it's retardedly inefficient, impractical, and cool

>>21221 I currently have 3x 1080p setup, and for me it seems to work perfectly, there's no scaling issues with applications (since some software or stuff don't scale well with higher PPI/DPIs), I just need the 1 or 3 monitors on top row for external sources, because then I could keep all monitors within my field of view. Problem is that directly behind the middle monitor there's no place on the table to attach clamp mount on the table (since there's some "side wall" under the table that prevents doing it, only with the 2 holes on the sides could do it with some long ass arms).

bump. If I buy a table clamp mount that's has long enough arm and is sturdy make, it should be good enough for one 23-24" monitor, right? That way I could have 1 monitor above my middle monitor, that would be used for game consoles and stuff.

>>21638 Once you go 4k you never go back. With 3 4k monitors you have so much real estate. For me, my left monitor is just vim (so many buffers), my center monitor is a game / youtube / or teams (if I'm presenting in a meeting) and my right monitor is 2-3 web browser windows. Its very hard to reproduce that on 1080p, especially when its normal for me to have 8 terminals + 4 files open on my left monitor all visible at the same time. Not saying this applies to you, but I'm speaking from experience.

Could this be used to remove or disable the ME?

>>21986 Identical inquiry.

wow how is that even possible

>>17895 >super passionate Cool, you mind answering a retard's question? Could blockchain be used to host something like a private server amongst friends? Think of a discord server for a group or a game server, like maybe 100 people or so, for the purpose of the question, invite only. Instead of everything being hosted on a server, could it be hosted on a small chain? Rather than having someone host, you just send your friends a link, through that they join the chain. Once on chain, and as long as they're online, they're helping to host. Get a few guys together and you no longer have a single point of failure. I mean, if cryptominers can run mostly undetectable on people's computers (the ones that sneak in with sketchy downloads, etc) couldn't a small blockchain run on very low-impact nodes? I guess it might work better as essentially proof of stake, but the "stake" would just be an assigned role as a trusted user on that server. I'm imagining a chat program where each server is deployed as its own chain. Is this already done with other tech? Am I just dumb as fuck and this is either not feasible or doesn't solve anything? I feel like I explained this like shit. lol

>>20184 Crypto will go mainstream when visa and MasterCard support on the fly currency conversion, while handling all the shitty technical quirks of Bitcoin. (Like your wallet ID changing after every transaction)

>>21947 > your wallet ID changing after every transaction this is important for privacy, and there's ways to deal with that if you want a public address for donations for instance

>>21813 oh innnnnteresting! >>21813

>>21813 "USB 3.0 is backwards compatible" No it fucking isn't! I've had so many devices not be intercompatible.

>>21887 It's also interesting to me that USB3 signaling often will interfere with 2.4ghz devices. Enough that Intel has a white paper about it with the end result basically being move the receiver/transmitter further from the port.

>>21944 I'm not aware of any that are exclusive to the darknet; they are likely all available on the clearnet and may have a hidden service for Tor users.

>>21944 >>21953 There are but at least 70% are for pizza and you want to avoid them, though most are private trackers anyways by necessity, I dont remember what they're called but I remember at least two normal public trackers on the darkweb though and i2p has hundreds of them Torrents are inherently deanonymising though, and a perfect solution other than >with a wifi extender you can do anything hasn't been found

>>21733 tor or not, mobile devices are not good for anonymity. this is also why i consider any mobile-only or mobile-first (((anonymous))) network/messenger a meme. <but meh what about mobile-using normies? those are exactly the users who need to be protected from their tech ignorance the most.

windows is a virus

>>21982 >vent moment Yeah, it is. I'm so fucking tired of having to deal with that shit, i even full switched on linux for my machines (and not because linux doesn't have issues but because once you set the system for good it stays the fuck there without causing random problems) but all the fucking niggers i know that still need Windows keep bothering me for support. I can't escape it.

>>22019 Just remember that they're not people and it will artificially boost your self esteem

>>21536 (OP) It's not just that, everything they want can be obtained without hassle off of IRC. Torrenting is the lowest common denominator to obtain warez. Paying to torrent is laughable. Seeding is laughable.

>>21804 I seed the things I care about and leech otherwise, I think this is the way, people complain no one seeds their shit when they're the one who cares about it enough to seed and they should just be happy to have given back to someone else

>>21536 (OP) I dislike private tracker retards because they are the kinds of people who unironically revel in the cancerous cock-sucking sekrit club circlejerk culture that's the default in private tracker spaces. It's just an aspect of humanity I personally hate and can't associate with. These are people who think coming up with and policing the humiliation rituals to get into and stay within these circles are not signs of mental illnesses.