>>774
I came here to reply to this and found another
>>776 of the same mind, so I say it to both of you:
I looked upon your eyes and knew you were my niggers.
Jokes aside, to the first comment I want to avoid repeating points because we align so well, so I'll instead say that worship is very based, but also when the baby/toddler is in control of the action. I remember one story which wasn't todcon proper, it was lolicon, parodying Precure I think- the lolis are bullying/domming some guy, but at the very end they have him bound and Huggtan (a baby) giving him a foot job while all of the girls watched and that, that was where the nut was founded.
Another fantastic scenario I've dreamed of (in one case literally) was succubus babies. For one, a bit complex for what'd be a 20 page doujin, but a bit of backstory can help the narrative I feel. Anyway, fantasy setting where the human kingdom is crusading against demons (succubi). Succubi can charm any man with a fetish, no resistance, so it's a difficult prospect. There is one guy, the MC however who is the equivalent of doomguy on the surface because no matter what succs he runs into none of them can charm him, he seems wholly asexual.
That is until he kicks down the door to the nursery.
Turns out this whole time he was a huge nepi, and thus this engine of slaughter is brought low and dominated by babies, and that, thank you for reading, is my blog post.
To the second comment, I've seen exactly that before, and it's so gross. My hypothesis is that because todcon is an extreme fetish, a lot of people seem to think they may as well go even further beyond for extremity than just stop there. Guro, rape... Cheese graters, just the most fucknasty shit. It's like they're getting off to the degeneracy or taboo itself more than the fetishes involved.
Babies/toddlers are precious beings. To hear them giggle and coo from being licked or caressed is better than sex, frankly. Like you say, a true admirer feels the same.