>>85280
Hahaha no. His style is very simple, straightforward, and easily replicable. Brazzer doesn't have a "something" that truly distinguishes him as a writer.
As an example, I can use two veteran writers from Eka: Fatedmeal and AFFY. The former follows the basic writing principle of "show, don't tell" and takes it to the extreme; he conveys the situation and scenes with actions, not words. Instead of saying, "She feels uncomfortable as she walks," he describes, "Her skin prickled for an instant; her most primitive human senses covered her shoulders with a heavy, invisible layer."
AFFY is the complete opposite. He describes the scene and situation as it is, and to keep it light, he uses bombastic words appropriate for the situation, which gives it a special touch. Brazzer, well, he is the truest of the two. His narration, in my opinion, is basic. His vore scenes aren't particularly spectacular (if they didn't have illustrations, they wouldn't be watchable at all), nor does he have the style of the aforementioned two. But what he does have is a great imagination. The ideas in all of his stories are really good, or at least enjoyable. He follows the plot relatively well, and honestly, his strength is his creativity, reflected in his characters. They're all quite different, and he handles them relatively well. If I had to compare him, I'd do it with Brandon Sanderson. A writer who stands out not for his narrations, but for his complex and distinctive stories. Ultimately, Brazzel and Seekgr complement each other very well. And yes, now that you mention it, their most recent stories could be generated by AI.