>>2 BO or janny, please clean up the cringe thread. It's been over a week of either Sage Anon or someone doing the exact same thing spamming off topic political nonsense. He has explicitly stated his point is to spam and derail because he doesn't like like the cringe thread. It has been over a week of this for fucks sake.

>>55054 >wah! someone called me cringe for being the initiator in bringing politics into the board and now that someone called me out for my bullshit im crying to the BO for help lol, lmao even

>>2 You know BO, almost every problem you've had to deal with could be solved if you enabled per thread IDs. It would eliminate samefagging and people would just filter out the retards that popup saving you having to ban people.

>>2 >>55054 I second this, the retard hates the cringe thread, and yet he keeps bumping it with his spam. Even when it hits the bump limit, they'll just make a new one.

>>55185 It's why I think it's just Sage Anon in a different skin after he made him self look like a moronic internet tough guy who thinks he's some sort of supervillain. He also didn't understand or care that repeatedly bumping and spamming the thread is just drawing attention to the cringe while admitting to doing it because of hating the cringe thread. If it weren't for him those threads wouldn't have more than a few posts a month on average because there just isn't much ABDL related cringe in the first place. Another cringe thread will inevitably get made just to spite the autistic dumbass that keeps spamming it. I'm not even sure what the point is for him. That people hate Sage Anon and people like him has been pointed out repeatedly and directly to them, yet they double down and keep making themselves look like crazy idiots trying to defend genuinely horrible narcissists. The only reason this is even an issue on /abdl/ is because BO/janny doesn't check the board for weeks at a time. None of the other top boards here have this issue of obsessed spammers because they actually bother to promptly clean up after jackasses trying to shit up their boards.

>>55066 >You know BO, almost every problem you've had to deal with could be solved if you enabled per thread IDs. I kind of hate the idea of thread ID's or logins. People will circumvent it. It is the nature of the board. However sage or who ever shitting all over the thread needs to be stopped. It really is some retard autistic with a hefty side of ocd. They're rubbing it out because they think they have power over us, >>55213 I kind of like the cringe thread. It is entertaining to see the dumb shit abdl's do when they don't listen to the common sense voice in their head. However it may be time to close the thread off and ban such. At least for a while.

>>55215 >However it may be time to close the thread off and ban such. At least for a while. No to this. That you even suggest it makes me think you are the guy spamming because he doesn't like the cringe thread. It's just doing what that guy wants and encourages future spamming and derailment to get his way if he doesn't like something about the board. Sage Anon outright admitted this was his goal to become such a nuisance that BO would do whatever he wants or BO would get frustrated enough to hand control of the board over to Sage Anon. You don't give a bratty child whatever they want every time they throw a tantrum, that is exactly what this is. Again, this wouldn't be an issue if BO or janny would actually bother to clean up spam and not ignore the board for weeks at a time. The board doesn't even get much activity, just checking in and cleaning up once or twice a week would be enough.

I do not really see why we have to actually take action with this. It's not like the board is actually having new threads being spammed or old ones bumped, like Sagefag did in the past, it mostly seems like the guy is just posting things in a single thread and at least actually typing out replies. Feel like bothering to ban someone who is annoying rather than just ignoring them would compromise values. If we ban everyone we don't like the place will just turn into a circlejerk, and the internet already has enough of those. The instinct should not be to immediately go to the mods for help, they should be a last resort for when the board is unusable or global rules are being broken.

>>55066 >You know BO, almost every problem you've had to deal with could be solved if you enabled per thread IDs. How would this solve the problem if this is Sagefag just shitting up the place and ban evading over TOR again? Or if it's a second troll just using his tactics? >>55215 You sound an awfully lot like Sage, definite "no" to closing the thread. >>55222 I agree, and while I hate to give the Cringetard credit, he's right, it says it's "Cringe Thread 3," with no mention that it has to be on-topic cringe. I say leave it, it may not be ABDL cringe, but it's top-notch cringe in general.

>>55232 >no mention that it has to be on-topic cringe. Well, it is in the ABDL forum, not /b/ and not /pol/, that might be a hint it should be on topic material only. The first post in this thread: >To get things started, something I am really hoping is fake. Either way I have to question what kind of shameless autistic pervert just walks around with cartoon fetish porn tattoos or how one would explain that to a normalfag that sees it without looking like a perverted nutjob that even more sane ABDLs would avoid. This is meant to be ABDL only. >>55232 >You sound an awfully lot like Sage, definite "no" to closing the thread. It was just an idea. I don't want to give in to sage or whoever is spamming the thread, but I also don't want to lose the thread completely or the board. Moderation would help - but BO has their life, too and we shouldn't need to ask that they give up time in the real to manage this nonsense here.

>>55232 I don't get this argument of OP for cringe thread 3 not explicitly stating ABDL related cringe. This is a form of midwit autistic rules lawyering about the exact wording. The board is /abdl/. It's implied from get go that it's ABDL related. OP for that thread opens with ABDL related cringe. It shouldn't have to be stated that a thread is ABDL related when that is the purpose of the board in general This would be like going to any other board and arguing that something isn't off topic because OP didn't explicitly state it has to be board related. This isn't /pol/. That thread needs to be cleaned up because it's just one guy spamming not board related political stuff and people taking the bait.

who the fuck cares about the quality of a cringe thread, it basically only exists for containment, which its doing

>>55235 >Well, it is in the ABDL forum, not /b/ and not /pol/, that might be a hint it should be on topic material only. I would agree if we didn't have other threads titled "ABDL Video Links" and "ABDL Hypnos" and ABDL whatever for most "theme" threads. The behavior is top tier cringe from ABDLs, so as far as I'm concerned it's on topic. >It was just an idea. I don't want to give in to sage or whoever is spamming the thread, but I also don't want to lose the thread completely or the board. My apologies for the accusation then. To be honest I'd be fine with the cringe thread going away, but not while it has trolls intentionally trying to cause that. To that end I'd take the stance I took on the video threads which is to double down on them just to piss of the trolls. >Moderation would help - but BO has their life, too and we shouldn't need to ask that they give up time in the real to manage this nonsense here. No one is asking BO to give up time IRL, they're asking for the bare minimum of appointing a janny or two to deal with the broken sewer pipes that keep shitting up the board. All BO has to do is pick a person or two he trusts and make them jannies and this problem would be over. GMs have apparently been yelling at BO to deal with this place, and for whatever reason BO doesn't want to put a janny or two in place. I don't think jannies are an excessive ask for a board that's this popular. >>55243 >I don't get this argument of OP for cringe thread 3 not explicitly stating ABDL related cringe. See above, most threads, including the video one prior to its most recent iteration all had an ABDL prefix in their name. It's easy to assume that it was meant to be general cringe shared by ABDLs. See my follow up comment as well that its existence is ABDLs engaging in cringe, ergo it's on topic. >>55251 Cringe and quality are mutually exclusive terms. The problem is that it's not doing its job of containment, as it's now spilling over into this thread. As far as I'm concerned it exists to poke the bear (piss off the trolls posting in it,) at this point. It's fun for that purpose, but barely useful for any other. I'm only for keeping it around just to piss off the trolls who want it gone. If they'd fuck off to X or Kiwifarms or some other cesspit I'd be fine if it died.

>>55251 >who the fuck cares about the quality of a cringe thread, it basically only exists for containment, which its doing So...in a way, the cringe thread is a diaper for /abdl/!

>>55384 >So...in a way With your analogy then it is a up to the neck and the sleeves of the onesie blowout diaer for /abdl/ ......

So who making a new cringe thread 4 after ragey sagey got the first attempt killed? What he do to get BO to remove the last one? Don't care about the quality, just wanna piss that ragey sperg off.

>>55482 I'm the one who made the previous thread. Not sure why it got deleted. I didn't get banned or anything. BO just decided to delete it for whatever reason. If that's the decision BO has made then I won't try to fight against it. The thread existed primarily to ragebait sage anyway. I'm not even entirely convinced politard is sage. It's more likely kawaiiomo. Whatever, in either case. Was hilarious while it lasted.

>>55482 >>55489 So BO confirmed to both just be capitulating to what Sage jackass tells him while also completely ignoring the board for weeks at a time. This board has gone downhill badly and new BO apparently has no spine.

If you fucking anons can't stop taking the bait and continue to turn this place into politics roleplaying like some leftypol qanon shithole. I might start considering if this board should mainly focus on art, stories and avoid threads that easily lead to boomer level politics. This place shouldn't need to be moderated multiple times by me or the GMs and admin on a daily basis. You can go back to the pig farmer over at 8kun and request ownership of /abdl/ if you want to be baited into having reddit tier discussions. As for the deleted cringe thread, it was trashed which only happens when either I or the OP decides to delete a thread or post. Deletions by GM or admins can't be untrashed on my end. I don't usually sleep walk while computing and logs don't show me deleting the thread. I'll untrash it if OP decides they want to continue the thread given what I just said.

>>55489 >>55490 Same thing happened last time with some dumbass deleting his own thread and people who didn't look at the logs assuming BO did it. >>55495 BO, why not just ban overt political discussion entirely or at least enable IDs as >>55066 suggested? Some other boards have it specifically for this reason. Just IDs would pretty heavily cut down on the spam and people taking the bait. Judging from the text and post style it's only few Anons samefagging while ceaselessly spamming and taking the repeated obvious bait. Just IDs would help a lot and slow down the problem posters. The cringe thread isn't really the issue and as another Anon pointed out other top boards here don't have this problem since the mods clamp down on the obsessed bad actors even with similar threads to the cringe one here. A lot of this problem would go away if you didn't repeatedly ignore sparks turning into fires. A decent Janny would fix a lot if you can't at least clean up the board once a week.. We can see the logs. You rarely bother to moderate and apparently leave the global mods to do all the work. I get a hands off approach, but you're letting very obvious bad actors fuck up the board. Also now that the cringe thread is autosaging the polititards are beginning to spill over into other threads such as here >>55387 >>55488 At the very least can you keep the political nuts to one or two threads? Just ban any political nonsense outside those threads if not banning it entirely. Plenty of online communities ban religious and political discussion entirely because of how easily it leads to derailment and disruption while giving a few political nuts and trolls free run to do what they please.

>>55495 >>55496 Just to clarify when I say maybe ban political discussion entirely or only ban it outside one or two containment threads I mean all political discussion. A lot of Reddit and Discord tier communities a rule of no politics really means "no politics, except for what the mods personally agree with" and is why a lot of those places end up as echo chambers of people jerking each other off for having the "correct" opinions.

>>55503 >A lot of Reddit and Discord tier communities a rule of no politics really means "no politics, except for what the mods personally agree with" and is why a lot of those places end up as echo chambers of people jerking each other off for having the "correct" opinions. If a political discussion ban were to be implemented, I would hope that it would actually be a true one. You point out that last example of Discord/Reddit circlejerks, but I've also seen that behavior on imageboards just as often. Especially considering that this is a relatively small board with a homogenous set of opinions, I'm not sure if it could be entirely feasible, especially when the board-tan of /monarchy/ has become a recurring character and there are multiple threads about diapering women. At that point one has to ask if the intersection between the fetish and politics is what makes it acceptable, along the lines of someone fetishizing a religion but not actually making any statements about it? Of course with that level of wriggle room the rule would essentially be neutered from the start. By the reasoning presented it seems like comments about Jews would be banned for being under the purview of "political discussion," but somehow I don't think that would sit well with many of the posters here.

Don't let it be lost that >>51433 if this person didn't exist on this board we probably wouldn't have the drama that we do here. Right-wingers started this. As long as they continue to post their drivel, left-wingers will continue to retaliate. I support banning any and all politics from this board. I also support banning cringe threads because they always devolve into senseless nonsense.

>>55489 Probably because this got posted because OP asked for "dirt on kawaii omo". And since I have no reason to doubt >>55495 it seems like OP was just a faggot and couldn't handle the cringe.

>>55510 I get your point. Political discussion isn't even the issue really. It's that we have some jackass obsessively spamming threads with off topic irrelevant political nonsense that BO doesn't seem to care enough to do anything about. I don't have an issue with political discussion itself I have an issue with the obsessed polititard autist that apparently has nothing better to do than spam about how much he hates anyone who doesn't agree with him. The cringe thread drama has been repeatedly just one or a few Anons spamming and baiting because of not liking the existence of a cringe thread. Half the posts there over the past month are one guy spamming about how much he hates Trump, anyone not left of Lenin, and that there's a cringe thread. If BO would bother cleaning the spam and not ignore the board for weeks at a time we wouldn't be having this discussion. I would have the same problem with the constant derailing spam even if wasn't political. We had Sage Anon spamming Spiderman memes months ago for the same reasons as the current spammer, but with political discussion people take the bait a lot more. >>55512 This sounds like the insane spammer or Sage Anon continuing to complain about the existence of a Cringe Thread and people that don't agree with his politics. >>55514 Yeah, sounds like OP just got cold feet about being OP for cringe thread and deleted it. Definitely a faggot.

>>55489 >The thread existed primarily to ragebait sage anyway. All the more reason to double down on it IMO. If it keeps Sage spinning his wheels it unshits the rest of the board and is moderately entertaining, not necessarily because of the cringe (or lack of it,) but because it's pissing off Sage. I said this ages ago, but I have no interest in the cringe thread and am fine with it dying. At least I had no interest in it until Sage took the bait, now I want it at the top of the board solely to infuriate him, not because I give a damn about having a cringe thread. >>55490 >So BO confirmed to both just be capitulating to what Sage jackass tells him while also completely ignoring the board for weeks at a time. I think this is what bothers me the most about everything I'm reading here right now. Sage already told you his goal was disruption, and then at some point claimed it was to be BO making himself Lord of the Diaper Spergs, King of the Diaper Coomers, and first of his name. Failing that, his goal was to make BO his puppet in effect becoming BO by proxy, which is frustratingly what it appears he has no achieved. (And yes this still means that his goal has been disruption the entire time. It's never changed despite the BS he's spewed lately.) Now I don't believe anything that comes out of Sage other than that his goal is disruption since he keeps proving it, but at least at one point he claimed that everything he's said on here is a lie and that there were no domestic violence charges against old BO, and that Sage just made that up as a way to turn the board against him. It's likely BS, but if it's truly it probably means that old BO got sick of Sage's shit and just decided to let someone else deal with him, which is probably what Sage wanted since he likely realized he could just push over the next BO if he didn't say "how high" whenever Sage said "Jump!" NumberNine has made it clear that he isn't really interested in dealing with this place daily, which is part of the problem. It's clearly active enough to need daily moderation, and I suspect Sage's current plan to cause disruption here is to just shit up the place until NumberNine throws his hands up and quits as BO or the GMs remove him and suspend the board until a new BO can be found, at which point Sage will likely attempt to become BO, which is exactly what we *do not want*. >>55495 > If you fucking anons can't stop taking the bait and continue to turn this place into politics roleplaying like some leftypol qanon shithole. I might start considering if this board should mainly focus on art, stories and avoid threads that easily lead to boomer level politics. Do you think this is really going to stop Sage? He's just going to shit up those threads, bring the politards out of the woodwork in them, and drive away people who actually want to have a damn discussion, download some porn, and maybe are interested in the kind of stuff that's allowed here but typically not offered elsewhere. If it's just going to be art and stories that can be found everywhere else, you might as well just torch this place now BO. The entire reason this board is interesting is that it isn't just the same shit that's on Reddit and the three wannabe ADISCs that have popped up after that cancer was removed. >This place shouldn't need to be moderated multiple times by me or the GMs and admin on a daily basis. It shouldn't but it clearly does. Tide pods shouldn't have to be coated in warnings telling people not to eat them, but they do because stupid people kept putting them in their mouths. I shouldn't have to show my ID to buy compressed air to clean a computer, but I do because addicts kept using the shit to get high. We collectively shouldn't have to wade through Sage's shit, but here we are. The board shouldn't need daily moderation, you're right about that, but it unfortunately does. Why not just appoint a janny already and call it a day, as has been suggested countless times? >As for the deleted cringe thread, it was trashed which only happens when either I or the OP decides to delete a thread or post. I checked the logs and don't see anything about >>55463 in them on the two days in November for which logs exist. There is GM activity in the old cringe thread, specifically a report closure on >>55460 which was likely Sage trying to get the GMs to close that thread too with the GMs simply closing the report. >>55496 >BO, why not just ban overt political discussion entirely or at least enable IDs as >>55066 suggested? I can't remember if it was me or someone else, but earlier in the thread someone asked how IDs would prevent Sage from doing his thing when he's always using the site via TOR? Wouldn't his ID just change every time he ban evades and changes nodes? BO doesn't need to ban political discussion and I'm actually against that as it's one of the things that makes this place interesting when it's between sane-ish people and not the trolls. Why not just create an AB/DL political discussion thread and then delete any political discussion outside of that thread? If you're afraid the trolls will just use it to Ragebait, create one for left and right leaning ideologies and then purge any posts from the obvious ragebaiters. The point of 8chan is free speech and only the necessary amount of moderation. Cutting part of that off goes against the ethos of this place. (Nuking ragebait is however necessary moderation.) >Judging from the text and post style it's only few Anons samefagging while ceaselessly spamming and taking the repeated obvious bait. So let them circlejerk each other and call it a day, just give them their own little playpen to do it in so they're not shitting up the other threads, including the controversial ones. I don't care that they're circlejerking, I care that it's spilling out of the board's diaper formerly known as the cringe thread. >At the very least can you keep the political nuts to one or two threads? Just ban any political nonsense outside those threads if not banning it entirely. I'd be fine with, and am all for containing it to one or two threads like mature adults. I'm not cool with banning it entirely though. We're not Reddit. >>55503 This is exactly what would happen if a no political discussion ban were implemented here, and this place would be no better than Discord or Reddit. We don't need another hugbox circlejerk for people whose only life skill is kissing an edgelord's ass. This is sort of how old BO ran things and it was a mess. I'd rather have the trolls than have this place be one where people can't say what they really think. Besides, political discussion directly affects ABDLs. The tariffs on China have directly impacted which ABDL and ABDL-friendly medical diapers are or aren't sold into the USA as one example, as well as certain ABDL diaper manufacturers no longer offering free shipping or only offering it on large bulk orders. Price increases related to those tariffs have also occurred, with Tykables openly acknowledging that the tariffs were at fault. All of that is political stuff, but it's political stuff that affects ABDLs. The second political discussion gets banned we won't be able to discuss this as an issue for us. The people who want political discussions banned are usually the ones who are mostly on the losing side of the debate, which is why I'm against this. I am however in favor of removing it from threads where it exists to disrupt, which shouldn't be controversial because we'd remove other off topic posts that exist to disrupt. >>55515 >I don't have an issue with political discussion itself I have an issue with the obsessed polititard autist that apparently has nothing better to do than spam about how much he hates anyone who doesn't agree with him. Based! This is really the issue though, it's one fag (Sagefag without his nametag) shitting up the thread. There are probably five others who are poking the bear and giving it back to him, (and deservedly so,) but if he's gone they wouldn't be bothering. They're doing it because it pisses off the troll and as a bonus, keeps his crap in the cringe thread instead of letting it spread across the site. Now that there's no cringe thread, the shit is spreading again.

[Expand Post]

>I would have the same problem with the constant derailing spam even if wasn't political. Exactly, and if we got rid of political discussion Sagefag or his wannabe Samefag doppleganger on the off chance the politard isn't him would just pick something else to spam the thread with. It's obviously Sagefag though because he pulled the same thing in a previous video thread where he apparently posted real abuse material and the GMs nuked it. That was after he was ragebaited and couldn't beat the encryption for about a week before he eventually figured it out. He's just going to spam with different shit. If BO makes this an art and story thread, he'll just fill it with AI slop stories that are off topic and memes that could vaugely be considered art an keep shitting up the place. The problem isn't political discussion, it's one troll and BOs tissue-level rejection of just appointing a janny to deal with that troll, despite the entire board and apparently the GMs practically screaming at him to do just that. By the way Sage, since I'm sure you're beating your nuts off to this thread right now. /abdl/ on Endchan is currently unclaimed after BO took over here. Why don't you fuck off over to there or 8kun and do what you claim you wanted to do and create your own board. Go ahead, I dare you. I really want to see what the world's most dead ABDL board looks like, or how you enjoy it when the people here start shitting up your board. You have 24 hours or I'll just assume you're too much of a chickenshit to do anything other than cause chaos here. Beat us in the marketplace of ideas, you know, if you can.

>>55517 I love how BO just ignores your cringe, troon man. It must suck to be in your position right now to know that you are in the minority. Your frustration is apparent and I am loving every bit of it. Only a true loser would fly off the handle like you did. And look at this post you just made. You are the epitome of cringe. And the best part is you don't even know it.

Yo, BodyOdor, either sagefag or the politifag is shitting up the Kircai thread now. Do something, anything.

>>55558 Politard guy here. It's not me. I made like, one post in there max. Everyone else is just bickering amongst themselves. Hilarious to see though. Let them keep throwing rocks at each other. It is at least entertaining.

I just looked at the last few messages in the thread and I don't think Politard guy is lying in the post above. It looks like it's just anons bitching and then one asking a question about furfag acceptance by AB/DLs, and two people having an actual discussion answering that guy with posts that required actual brainwave activity instead of the usual sperging that goes on here. >>55550 Hi Sage! >>55558 Hi Sage! Back to shitting up the meta thread now that the cringe thread is bumplocked?

Actually I think a lot of threads got pruned, some of my posts disappeared.

>>55646 Looks like the majority of the political bullshit was pruned. Much thanks to BO for getting things back on track...

>>55673 Was just confused because it seems like unrelated posts were caught in the purge. There was some discussion in the Kircai thread that seems to have accidentally gotten the axe and there was a similar thing in some other threads. Also that's a good image

>>55679 >Was just confused because it seems like unrelated posts were caught in the purge. Probs not able to get them back once delete button pressed. If BO was moving quickly, may have axed some that didn't need. Even if BO realized it, once gone, can't get them back. IMHO it is what it is. I didn't check to see if anything of mine got scrubbed. If so ain't gonna miss out on any sleep for it. >Also that's a good image Thanks! :)

>>55646 >>55673 On one hand thanks BO for cleaning things up, on the other this has happened multiple times because of current BO just ignoring the board for weeks at a time and refusing to find a decent janny if he can't or won't promptly clean up the spam himself. Really would only take cleaning up a couple times a week at most with the current activity, but according to the logs of past few months it's mostly GM activity. October only has two days where BO did anything apparently.

>>55798 That wouldn't stop me just FYI. The only real solution is to disallow the creation of new cringe threads. But BO is a degenerate himself originating from Kiwifarms so, he likes to jerk off on the less fortunate as much as the rest of you twat weirdo fucks. I have no sympathy for that dude. I do agree he should pass BO over to someone else. He is not present here.