>>319396
An observation can still be incorrect.
What this basically boils down into is an argument of "whats" versus "whys."
Nackt isn't stupid, but his interpretation of the background reasons behind certain events, especially relating to this board, are factually incorrect. He's still being
reasonable - because IF things unfolded in the way and the why he believes they did, then his actions and statements would be perfectly valid. That's what sets him apart from things like Cancer Crew, because the latter knew exactly what was going on but misrepresented it to capitalize on it and gain. Honest intentions versus dishonest ones. Because the interpretation he's using was also the exclusive interpretation used by a whole body of D&C shills over this board's life, some unknown and others known, and known to
be acquaintances of his, it is my evidence that he's been influenced by their rhetoric.
Much like Nackt, I might be wrong in my interpretation. I state it because that's what the available evidence leads me to believe.
>>319401
Ralph isn't actually blocked here. He was for a short time because he goofed and made a deliberate effort to fracture the /v/ hub, but I never held a grudge against him the way most /v/ regulars did, and the block was lifted as soon as he did something that showed he was in the game for #GG and not just purely himself.
The only question I have to ask concerning CultofVivian is this:
>How much aid, exposure, and support did she give to #GG's cause versus how much measurable damage she inflicted on it?
Speaking more generally and to no one person in particular, I'd like to add that ideological purity is an extremely cancerous motivation for sparking divisions in a community. Other people not marching in lockstep with every facet of your ideology is not the same thing as them imposing their ideals on you, and it certainly does not justify trying to force your ideals on them. Everything is give and take, and don't act surprised when, after taking and taking and taking and angrily rebuffing every request to give leeway to your allies, that you finally get told to just fuck off because you aren't the bosses of anyone.
And especially don't project like a good little SJW that all that happening means that someone is trying to boss
you around. The correct alternative to "leaders" is "no leaders." Not "MUH PURE LEADERS WERE RIGHT."
No.
Leaders.
Yes, this means
you too. Get off your horse, set aside your differences and work together with your allies. It got such results when we started out that way, remember? But quit blaming other people for the problems you instigated because you refused to play ball with anyone outside your ideological network. The decision to take your ball, go home and cry on social media about it was
your decision. No one else's.