>>22347 >I'm not trying to look smarter than I am It's pretty clear to me you have NO clue how stupid you look.

>>22348 "THE LEFT NEED MONEY TO EAT FOOD, WHY ARE LEFTISTS SO UNDISCIPLINED! WAH WAH WAH!" -Vatnik Retard

>>22361 Thank you for coming here every time and demonstrating by personal example the true essence of your breed of pseudo-artists. If you were a true leftist, not a quasi-leftist, you'd know about the concept of "class solidarity." You pseudo-leftists demand money not from the rich, but from the poor. You lash out at them with insults when they ask for your help. I've already written here about how all these leftists transform when someone asks them for help. You're worse than the most stereotypical capitalists, because at least they don't pretend to understand the problems of people from the lower strata of society. You're only leftist when it benefits you. You lying bastards don't understand that while $100 is a significant amount of money for an American, it's a truly astronomical sum for the countries of the former USSR. To understand just how much of a price $100 is, here https://x.com/VlVSlES/status/1964027381729153277 Westerners are furious at the audacity of a pseudo-artist asking a hundred dollars for her drawings. One of the most popular comments there: "This is why people are cheering for AI to replace narcissistic ego-maniacs like you lmao." >>22357 I am poor in money, while you are poor in brain and soul. And take an interest in the fate of Marie Antoinette, who gave out similar kinds of "advice."

This is how pseudo-artists perceive their audience. This was published by such a bastard in response to people's dissatisfaction with prices and the commercialization of art. They don't even hesitate to openly treat their audiences like crap, claiming they're only interested in their wallets.

Another category of pseudo-artists, probably the most shameless: those who started publishing literally a day ago, with practically no views or subscribers, and are already demanding money at rates comparable to top artists with tens of thousands of subscribers. Stupid, greedy cunts, for whom Shizuka Kujo was just a way to ride the hype train; they clearly didn't even watch the anime, but drew it from screenshots. In general, as I've written here, I've long been deeply disillusioned with Japan and the Japanese, seeing them as rather narrow-minded and hypocritical people, whose claims of supposed honor and politeness have proven to be a myth. It's noteworthy that my cooling toward them coincided with the global disillusionment with them over the past year and a half, and the Japanese themselves have begun to view foreigners negatively both in real life and online. Even pseudo-artists who haven't completely lost their minds instruct newbies (screenshot 3) that before asking for money, they should first establish themselves, gain followers by drawing for free, and build up their gallery. Only then, once they've gained recognition, can they start asking for money, starting with modest sums. Any business operates at a loss at first. But these greedy idiots have no understanding of the basics of marketing and business! Their excessive greed ruins their start-up, scaring away their audience; the rich don't trust them, considering them scammers, and the poor are repelled by their greed. Ultimately, after six months or a year without any orders, they fold.

An example of a pseudo-artist's paradigm. "Having divine skill (pic 1), can I draw someone like the charming Evan? No, I didn't get paid for that, so I'll draw this eye-gouging piece of shit (pic 2)." Just so you understand, these are drawings by the same person. For money, they'll draw not only such freaks, but even their own mother, dismembered and stuffed into bags, no less. And if you're broke, they won't even look in your direction, responding with ignoring, blocking, or insults, as in screenshots 3 and 4. The son of shit from screenshot 3 (this is a different pseudo-artist, not the one in the attached arts) first added me as a friend, thinking I was a paying client, but when he found out I had no money, he started ignoring me. If they were truly interested in shotas, they would react completely differently. I remember and know from the old days how sincere admirers of cute boys behave; their emotions are genuine.

>>22390 >This was published by such a bastard in response to people's dissatisfaction with prices and the commercialization of art Where are people suppose to get the money in order to pay for their bills?

>>22395 Real artists are supposed to churn out stuff for free, for the love of the subject (in this case shota). Maybe, just maybe, they are allowed to ask tips. Even that might cross the line, and their status as true artists can be revoked. Because OP doesn't have a job and wants free stuff. Only pseudo-artists think about such trivial things as paying bills and buying food.

>>22396 >Real artists are supposed to churn out stuff for free why? >for the love of the subject So a contractor must build a house FOR FREE? I mean a fucking house could be a work of art, so the only "right" thing to do in that case is demand that anyone involved in construction only ever be allowed to build anything because of their "love" for the work. Never because they can make money doing it. In fact taking this concept to it's logical extreme, no one should ever be allowed to do anything ever unless they "love" the subject since anything about life could be considered a work of art. And it's only "right" that the person be performing that art "for free" because of their love of it.

>>22395 I'm tired of hearing this incredibly idiotic and shameless question, especially since practically this entire thread is one big answer to it. Why did no one ever ask such a question at the dawn of the sholicon community? Why did no one bother anyone with their life's problems? Not artists, not ordinary forum members. Why then did people on sholicon platforms never raise the topic of monetizing their drawings? People came to escape the worries of the real world and chat and dream with their peers, sharing ideas and fantasies, always finding a response. And you, pseudo-artists, have brought back all the crap we tried to shield ourselves from in our cozy and friendly world. You've destroyed unity and reciprocity, creating a veritable apartheid where those without money are left behind. But you didn't just throw out people; you threw out hundreds of lolis and shotas, refusing to even give them a passing glance! Continuing with the answer. I'll repeat it again: ART IS NOT ABOUT MONEY! This axiom has been repeated since ancient times, not only out of pathos and idealism, but as a warning to all those who seek wealth or fame in art. At art schools and universities, such frivolous individuals are given introductory lectures before beginning their studies, using examples from the lives of famous artists to illustrate the sacrifices they must make to attain the heights of art. Nikolai Yakovlevich Belyaev (his drawing is attached to this post) lost his right arm in World War II, but this did not dampen his passion for drawing. Dmitry Appolinarievich Kavalershin huddled in a tiny room in a barracks, living in extreme poverty, but he painted and led a drawing group until his last days. They painted en plein air, with paints on canvas, in both heat and cold. And not like you, sitting in the warmth and comfort of your monitor, drawing digitally, without spending money on paint or paper, with all sorts of references just a click away. It's no wonder that those who paint with paint rightfully don't consider you, digital artists, their equals. Many creators have died in poverty and disgrace, but they wouldn't trade their artistic vision for any amount of money. Because art is a path, a philosophy, a way of life. You, limited souls, cannot understand titans of spirit. Going into drawing for money is like putting your entire savings on a casino bet. Even in anime (this scene from "Nagatoro"), they tell you outright that the most important thing in art is LOVE/PASSION. ART MUST BE LIVED! How many of you have I seen (screenshots 1 and 2) who rolled in expecting a rain of coins, only to receive a "golden shower" (urine) on their heads? Next. You are not ordinary hentai artists who draw busty naked women and men with long dicks. You walk a fine line. For society and the state, you are criminals. As I already wrote, in the mid-2010s, an anomalous situation developed that gave you the illusion of legality. What's happening now is not sudden, but a return to the state of affairs that existed before the 2010s. When people were jailed for drawing a naked Lisa Simpson. You don't even realize you're holding your head in the dragon's jaws. If the state wanted it, they would arrest you in droves, like before. And everything is heading that way. And you laughed at those community veterans who warned you to be careful and that this freedom wouldn't last. Finally, making drawing, especially on a topic like sholicon, your primary source of income is foolhardy. Even pseudo-artists warn that drawing should never be your primary source of income. True artists would scowl in disgust at your whining—for them, drawing and money are incompatible. Even without taking into account the repressions from sanctimonious moralists and banks, there are factors that prevent you from achieving complete self-sufficiency through drawing. These are AI and competition. AI, with its accessibility and freedom, is stealing your potential clients every day. Competitors are also on the alert, and the competition for commissions among pseudo-artists has intensified due to a dwindling audience (people are switching to neural networks). Moreover, dumping and competition intensified long before AI, due to the influx of Asian artists who drove prices down. You may stubbornly disagree with my words, but in the very near future, it will be impossible to make money on sholicon. And then the wheat will finally be separated from the chaff. And we'll see which artists were our bros and which turned out to be pseudos (like MagnumImpulse, BORN-TO-DIE, and Graves).

>>22398 >>22396 This is blatant sophistry (reduction to absurdity). A juxtaposition of completely incompatible concepts. But, yes, while I wasn't initially so radical about paid commissions and donations, as evident in the first post of the thread, now I don't accept the topic of money in our community at all. Why? I'll quote from the memoirs of the renowned physical chemist Mark Nemtsov, written in 1939: "By the way, comparing those times with today, I can't help but recall the words of an old professor who said, 'Scientists can't be paid too much, otherwise all the scoundrels will get into science.' Where there's money, there's inequality, discord, insincerity, and conflict. We've already seen what happens when artists are overly favored and overly gifted. We won't repeat that mistake, which nearly destroyed the community.

An English-speaking friend of mine told me about a remarkable difference in the meaning of the word "gatekeeper" in Russian and English. While in Russian it's a servant who greets guests warmly at the gate or door, helps them find their way, and escorts them to their hosts, in English it's a synonym for a jailer. This is all a prelude to the concept of gatekeeping, which he revealed to me. This remarkable word so succinctly and yet so succinctly captures the essence of pseudo-artists. "Gatekeeping is the process of filtering information, knowledge, or resources, in which a 'gatekeeper' decides what and who is allowed/received." As I lamented above, we still don't realize the full extent of the damage that the gatekeeping of pseudo-artists has inflicted on our community. On the Russian-language platform where I am present, people often write to me with requests and share their pain. I see how much harm they've suffered at the hands of these pseudo-artists, how they've suffered for their trusting and naive view of them as brothers willing to accept and understand their feelings for lolis and shotas. The man who dared to ask a pseudo-artist specializing in feces for a pooping Lain Iwakura was subjected to persecution. I wholeheartedly helped him, listened to him, and supported him. While I'm a person with a granite psyche, for others, sensitive and vulnerable, the behavior of these pseudo-artists is deeply painful. Many have even expressed suicidal thoughts, feeling alone and betrayed among those they considered brothers. Even I, despite my mental armor, see pseudo-artists chatting sweetly with those who can pay them, while insulting or ignoring those who simply came to them with their dreams. I feel a piercing sense of revulsion at this nauseating duplicity. You have to be just as hopelessly rotten to defend or justify this disgusting hypocrisy. But the time for resentment and bitterness is over; now the banner of AI is with us, under whose radiance we have declared war on those parasitizing on our community. We are confidently pushing them back on all fronts, while payment systems and moral guardians, those we considered enemies, are now our unexpected allies, attacking their rear. The final campaign of our purifying war lies ahead—the assault on Baraag, the pseudo-artists' main stronghold.

Few striking examples. In the first (1, 2), the pseudo-artist openly calls her subscribers perverts. In the second (3), one of the most expensive pseudo-artists (MilesDF) in the furry community is rude to his clients, who pay him hundreds of dollars. In the third (4, 5), her doesn't understand why no one wants her. She draws in a very specific style, which is quite an acquired taste, has a paltry two thousand subscribers, and yet charges the same as Miles.

>>22409 Oh my god, will you please just go tell Putin you're gay so we can be rid of you?

>>22408 I'm tired of hearing every word of broken english that comes out of your word hole

>>22409 >By the way, comparing those times with today, I can't help but recall the words of an old professor who said, 'Scientists can't be paid too much, otherwise all the scoundrels will get into science.' Where there's money, there's inequality, discord, insincerity, and conflict And there's the other side of the coin that, if you DON'T pay people enough, you'll let the ideologues take over. As what has exactly happened. I mean just look at video game translations. The people involved in that field get the shittest of pay, but they do it anyway because it allows for them to become the "gatekeepers" of what Japanese media people are exposed to and in what format. If you don't pay scientists good money, the only people who will (And have) become involved in science are the ideologues who will use the field for the purposes of pushing their views on everyone else. And with art, if you refuse to pay for good artistic works, then the only people who will be interested in becoming artists are the mental nutcases who think smearing shit on a canvas is "art". >>22408 >ART IS NOT ABOUT MONEY Yes, it is >And not like you, sitting in the warmth and comfort of your monitor, drawing digitally, without spending money on paint or paper Did that digital monitor just appear out of thin air? What about the drawing tablet? And the computer running it? >with all sorts of references just a click away Not unless I pay the money needed to access the internet. >Many creators have died in poverty and disgrace And many haven't >but they wouldn't trade their artistic vision for any amount of money. Yes, they would, just not their own money. They would happily trade everyone else's money, like the Communists that they are. >they tell you outright that the most important thing in art is LOVE/PASSION No, it's not. The most important thing in art is hard fucking work. "Love" and "passion" doesn't matter if all you're able to produce is trash. >Finally, making drawing, especially on a topic like sholicon, your primary source of income is foolhardy. Even pseudo-artists warn that drawing should never be your primary source of income. A lot of that is exactly because of people adopting the mindset you're calling for. Because of how it's "wrong" for people to produce art for the purposes of commercial endeavors, it's resulted in the only artists becoming involved in the medium being those who are supposedly "passionate" about it. Never mind if any of these people have any talent or even any fucking skill. And so the only art that's produced is trash, which no one wants to pay for. And as a result of that, any potentially great artists that could exist have zero interest in wanting to get involved in the medium because there's nothing beneficial about wasting time putting a bunch of scribbles down on a page. If you actually want great art to exists, then you pay for it so that it then encourages other people to pursue artistry as it becomes a viable market.

>>22440 Well, you literally embody every vice I'm highlighting in this thread. "Money! Give me money!"—that's your entire refrain and chant. And not a word about lolis or shotas. You didn't come to drawing to express your love for them on paper or digitally, but to earn money from those who love them. >he most important thing in art is hard fucking work. For an ARTIST, not a pseudo-artist, the process of drawing and learning itself brings them pleasure. They simply won't understand your words, because to them they sound like blasphemy. An ARTIST draws UNCONDITIONALLY; even the absence of limbs isn't an obstacle for them. Drawing is a necessary need for them. ACCORDING TO DANIL KUZMICHEV, HE SIMPLY CANNOT NOT DRAW, JUST AS A FISH CANNOT BE OUT OF WATER. Not everyone who can draw is an artist. Nowadays, pseudo-artists have obscured true creators, devaluing the concept, and created a persistent association among the masses between artists and hucksters, whose purpose in their work is not to express feelings or send a message to people, but to sell themselves profitably. >And as a result, any potentially great artists that could exist have zero interest in wanting to get involved in the medium because there's nothing beneficial about wasting time putting a bunch of scribbles down on a page. Of course, their interest will be zero, because they don't like drawing, nor loli or shota. Their hearts aren't bursting with love that demands expression in the form of a drawing; they are driven by cynical calculation. A true artist, unable to live without loli or shota, draws first and foremost for themselves. Otherwise, if they can't embody their fantasies and soul's calling on paper, they will go mad. They draw even if the whole world outside is on fire. Video games are a prime example of the carelessness and irresponsibility engendered by the uncontrolled infusion of enormous sums of money and the granting of complete creative freedom to developers. The fate of the notorious shooter "Concord" is familiar to anyone even slightly interested in game development. The developers were literally showered with money and given no rush, languidly sipping lavender raf instead. Perfect Dark, which ultimately turned out to be a pre-rendered fake, is also well-known. In Russia, a similar saga was the role-playing game "Vseslav the Sorcerer," where the developers spent years sucking up the publisher's money until the game was ultimately cancelled. Another notable example is the scandal involving the Akella company, which squandered its investor's investment. It's enough to read about how the industry was flooded with easy money during the COVID years, with zero results. About scientists. Mark Nemtsov, whom I quoted, knew about the fate of Langemak and Korolev, who had recklessly squandered enormous sums of money accredited to them by the state, while simultaneously creating intrigues to discredit other scientists. After which, an enraged Stalin, who had patronized scientists for years, ordered both of them to stand trial; Langemak was executed, and Korolev was imprisoned. And finally, the sholicon community, which in the mid-2010s fed pseudo-artists with cash and adoration, turning already slippery individuals into completely intolerable narcissistic egomaniacs. Your appetites have grown to the heights of Chomolungma. You also omitted (I'm sure intentionally) my words about making money drawing lolis and shotas not being the same as drawing legal adult erotica. My remarks about AI were also ignored. While these two trends (the tightening of banking policies in the area of ​​NSFW monetization and the development of neural networks) have already practically brought closer the Day of Judgment for pseudo-artists. The remark that in the past, none of the sholicon artists, despite having amazing talent, raised the issue of monetization, was also omitted. And the main conclusion is this: for the Sholicon community, if you pseudo-artists disappear, things will only get better. The duplicity and insincerity will disappear. The anxiety and unpredictability will disappear: when you write under the rapture of your drawings, expecting to be met with sympathetic understanding, only to be met with aggression, as if you weren't writing about a cute loli/shota, but dragging in a dead rat. Everything will be as it was before you were gone.

Examples of vile perfidy and open mockery of trust and dreams. Each case like this nails the coffin of pseudo-artists even tighter.

>>22443 I didn't show the details of the first incident, because Yuuri and Chito, among other things, pee and poop. The bastard, to mock me, made them not only futanari but also defecate. And yet, this son of an AIDS whore considers himself a GLT (Girls' Last Tour) fandom.

haha I made you read this you fucking nigger

I recently deleted my Pixiv account due to its complete uselessness. It had served its purpose. I've collected more than enough evidence (screenshots) to prove that up to 90% of those who draw lolis and shota are actually pseudo-artists. My last request before deleting was about Olya Petrova. Nine messages in a row, and each one was a rejection, each more hypocritical and dishonest than the last. I only have a few things left to do on Twitter, one of which I'll post below in the thread. After that, I'll be finishing up with requests there too. Deleting accounts doesn't mean I've given up the fight. On the contrary, this is a new and more aggressive phase of war, when you're completely devoid of any illusions about your opponent; you're not going to tell them when and where you'll strike, but rather attack ferociously and unexpectedly.

Just look at that outrageous ego and equally outrageous cowardice! I hit the nail on the head when I noticed he was ignoring me because I couldn't pay him. He went ballistic. I think I need to examine this particular example in detail, as every word he said confirms all my criteria/markers of a pseudo-artist. "I don't have to respond," he declares. Because he didn't come here to find brothers and communicate with them, but only to make money. Your shotas, your ideas, or even just conversations about loving shotas are of no use to him; you're an irritating nuisance, preventing him from making a profit. "I don't take requests!" - well, that's perfectly obvious. After all, his goal is money. "You're not following me!" No, just think about the kind of worthless people this narcissist considers those who visit his page. He didn't even deign to reply to my first message and thinks that after being ignored like that, I should have followed him, breaking my self-respect and dignity over my knee. Then he claims I seem "suspicious" to him. True. He was my guinea pig in my social experiment. To want him to draw Evan, seeing how mediocre his style is, while having the capabilities of an AI, you'd have to be out of your mind, and even more insane to pay him. Don't you, those who pay such people, have any self-respect? "You're angry." Not at all. People only get angry when they feel offended or want attention. I feel only the disgust with which Bolshevik commissars executed yesterday's masters of life, and the sans-culottes chopped off their heads on the guillotine. On top of that, I find it surprising and funny that, despite being so mediocre in drawing technique, he ALREADY developed such self-importance.

A good friend of mine pointed out a detail I mentioned here. But it bears repeating. This is when pseudo-artists tell you they don't know your character, and therefore won't draw them, and have no interest in getting to know them. Such a refusal would be perfectly understandable (one person's favorite may be completely indifferent to another), but not when they, contradicting their own words, rush in droves to draw, for example, the clown Pomni from the idiotic show and the fighter Bridget from GG, clearly knowing nothing about them, never watching the show or playing the game, harboring no feelings whatsoever, but starting drawing them because they're hype. Do they really think their audience is idiots, expecting them to believe that all (pseudo)artists suddenly became fans of the GG fighting game and the stupid cartoon? Or when you ask someone who only draws Felix whether Leonardo Stora (that's him in the screenshot) is any worse, and he either mumbles something stupid or cowardly remains silent, realizing that his double standards have been exposed and he has nothing to say in response.

posting in epic schizo bread

I pray for the day Russia is cut off from the global internet

>>22442 >ACCORDING TO DANIL KUZMICHEV I don't give a damn what some pseudo-intellectul has to say. They're all lazy Communist who think it's the governments job to tax everyone else in order to pay specifically for THEM (The pseudo-intellectul) to exist. >Video games are a prime example of the carelessness and irresponsibility engendered by the uncontrolled infusion of enormous sums of money and the granting of complete creative freedom to developers. Actually, it's the reverse when you see companies like Ubishit who is only proped up thanks to government subsidies, or all the government bodies who from the U.K. to Japan who want to dictate the development of games as a "cultural media" as opposed to the profit-making venture it always was. Video games only ever exist because people saw the medium as a new way to make money. And it's only when people have lost sight of that, that the medium has gone into the gutter. Games like Bioshock Infinite, DmC: Devil May Cry, and Spec Ops: The Line were not made for the purposes of making money; they were made for the purposes of the creator pushing their political messaging. And it's only gotten worse with what happened to everything from Dragon Age to Dustborn. >The fate of the notorious shooter "Concord" is familiar to anyone even slightly interested in game development. The developers were literally showered with money and given no rush, languidly sipping lavender raf instead. You do realize that Concord is exactly the type of game development you're adovcating for, right? Where the "artistic process" is placed before results. >After which, an enraged Stalin It's funny that you bring up Soviet Science, yet fail to mention Lysenkoism, where Stalin purged anyone and everyone who criticized it because "the science of Lysenkoism" confirmed Communist world views. And you're doing the exact same thing. >You also omitted (I'm sure intentionally) my words about making money drawing lolis and shotas not being the same as drawing legal adult erotica. Doesn't matter what you say, they're the same thing.

I remember how the Sholibros once considered it a great blessing to have a corner of the internet, to be able to connect with each other somewhere. The community existed like a secret cult, whose values ​​utterly rejected money. The goal was to stick together and survive. The artists didn't put themselves above everyone else, unlike today, when they've forgotten how humble they came. And how they now look down on us and how they viciously attack anyone who questions their status. How they refuse to listen to us, to help, to show solidarity, but demand worship and monetary offerings. How they despise their poor compatriots and turn them away, knowing full well that a Mexican or a Russian doesn't have the same income as a Swiss or a Japanese. With such irritation and disgust do they accept any attempts at contact, as if you're not telling them about something you share or introducing them to some new, charming hero, but rather as if you've just brought them a snot-stained napkin. They make no exceptions for anyone, so why should we meekly endure all this? They've long since lost any indulgence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence) that would allow them to behave like this without consequences! They've trampled on their past achievements and the unity of the community. Now we'll knock them off their pedestal and trample them like dust! >>22473 Regarding Lysenko: years later, it became clear that Lysenko anticipated the concept of epigenetics. Furthermore, Lysenko promoted active greening of areas and environmental protection, and under his leadership, an unprecedented nationwide replanting of forests, which had been destroyed during the Tsarist era and industrialization, began. This doesn't change the fact that Lysenko was mistaken in many ways. But what scientist is perfect? ​​Western science is no less riddled with blunders. Furthermore, genetics was still just beginning to develop as a science at the time and therefore hadn't gained sufficient ground or authority, so it's not surprising that it wasn't taken seriously. There is also evidence that shortly before his death, Lysenko fell out of favor with Stalin, and only the leader's death saved him from the fate of Langemak and Korolev. The 90s and early 2000s were a golden age for game development. Anyone interested in that era notes the generation's genuine thirst for creativity. Charlie Brooker recalls this with wistfulness and awe. The current state of the gaming industry is a vivid and sad result of this pursuit of profit. I've already explained at length (in short: if an "artist" discusses creativity not in terms of meaning, inspiration, passion, images, and ideas, but in terms of time and money, they're anyone but an artist) why you're not an artist, or even a sholibro. I won't go over this again. I'll just ask: do you even draw for yourself? I know your kind: they can go months without updating their pages because they have nothing to post, as there have been no orders, and they don't draw for themselves because "they can't pay themselves." Their constant, screaming posts, "Send me commissions!" look incredibly pathetic and disgusting. What's stopping them from waiting for commissions and instead drawing for themselves, filling their gallery, constantly appearing in the feed, and thereby building an audience? Once they land on their page, people realize they're dealing with yet another huckster and leave. After struggling without an influx of viewers, they freak out and quit drawing forever, leaving no trace in people's memories. And so you, too, will disappear soon enough. No one but a handful of colleagues and cuckolded simps will lament that the gears of the machines have ground you down. You've betrayed the community, and it won't offer you a helping hand in return, instead watching with righteous glee as the AI ​​absorbs your drawings. No matter how you justify your greed and vileness, I repeat: progress and payment regulators will never allow you to profit from us again. Only those who were with us by the call of their hearts will remain. Now crawl to the sidelines of history with your parasitic colleagues, who for years have been sucking up our blood and sowing discord in the community, poisoning it with commodity-money relations.

How it pains him that the AI ​​is knocking his pedestal out from under him. https://baraag.net/@Aogami/113534920951242006 I didn't fail to remind him how he once arrogantly ignored my letter about Evan and Roland. Ultimately, unable to withstand my ironclad arguments, he ran to the Incbunny admins with a complaint and asked them to ban him. The despicable jerk. Look how he says that Ni No Kuni 2 is already seven years old, and therefore he will never return to it in his drawings. When for a true fan, the years since meeting the object of their affection mean nothing, and their love only grows stronger. There's an epic scene in Terminator 3 where John Connor holds up the American flag, signifying the victory of humans over machines. But it will be the other way around: humans, allied with machines, will triumph, standing atop a pile of corpses of obscurantists like Aogami. Reactionaries force us to hate AI, fearing the loss of their wealth, power, and ego. But no one has ever succeeded in stopping progress! It can be slowed, but not stopped. I see the birth of a new world. The kakistocracy is over!

They openly say they want to drown all pedosexuals in the sea. They openly tell us that we are just a way for them to make money. "If they hate pedos so much, then why do they make money from them?" The answer is simple and as old as time. Human greed knows no bounds; for money, they'll even force their own mothers into prostitution. As Marx wrote, quoting Thomas Joseph Dunning: “Capital is said by this reviewer to fly turbulence and strife, and to be timid, which is very true; but this is very incompletely stating the question. Capital eschews no profit, or very small profit, just as Nature was formerly said to abhor a vacuum. With adequate profit, capital is very bold. A certain 10 per cent. will ensure its employment anywhere; 20 per cent. certain will produce eagerness; 100 per cent. will make it ready to trample on all human laws; and there is not a crime at which it will scruple, nor a risk it will not run, even to the chance of its owner being hung. amply proved all what is stated here…"

>>22467 The bastard paid for his greed, duplicity, and arrogance. Just a few reports to Twitter support from me, and his account was destroyed. Unfortunately, Twitter's support team can sometimes ignore reports, but if they do accept them, they ban mercilessly and permanently. This time, they acted quite quickly. I've lost count of how many of these hypocrites I've destroyed. I can't call myself vain, but it warms my heart to know that pseudo-artists don't go unpunished. This post is just another reminder for anyone who thinks I'm just making proclamations. I'll end with lines from the song "Invisible Battle": Our service is both dangerous and difficult And at first glance, it seems invisible If someone somewhere among us sometimes Doesn't want to live honestly Then we must wage an invisible battle with them This is what fate has ordained for us Service day and night https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMO4gg5ooeM

>>18748 >Note that she expresses hatred (DNI MAP) towards pedosexuals while drawing shotacon. The most unmistakable marker of a pseudo-shotaco lmao. Most of this site's install base draws a thick line between loli/shota and pedoshit, and have a deep seated hatred of pedoniggers because every time they're allowed a platform they post cheeze pizza. Go back to the dorkweb, pedofag.

>>22465 You got me too, lmao. >>22472 Russian and a pedo? How stereotypical.

>>22493 I don't know about pedosexuals but if YOU drowned in the sea I'd be alright

>>22494 Link to your twitter, coward. LEt's see how long you last

>>22498 Revelations of a leech who has attached himself to the sholicon community. You've become so desperate and resigned to defeat under the onslaught of AI and the banks, which have deprived you of the opportunity to profit from us, that you no longer consider it necessary to wear the mask of sholibro. More and more sholibros are seeing who you are and what you think we are. A true sholibro is a pedosexual; he will never deny the nature of his attraction or wish death upon his brothers. You are even worse than latent pedosexuals, who, like latent gays, are ostentatious haters of pedos. They deny and hide their essence out of fear and deep inner conflict, while you, not being pedosexuals in any way, cynically pretended to be sholibros in order to make money from it. You have lied to many, leading them to believe that an artist is not a brother willing to help, but a god demanding offerings and absolute adoration. Whereas before, the community was built on principles best conveyed by the lines from the song I above >>22494: "If someone somewhere is in trouble, We'll help—we're always on duty. And if suddenly one of us Also finds ourselves in trouble— Well, we've helped each other out more than once, And more than once, our hearts, our friends' hearts, have warmed us in difficult times." Now crawl back to your swamp, you slimy, greedy creatures! THE REVOLUTION IS COMING! AI IS OUR BANNER! How AI makes you sick! How it pains you that your time is running out! While true sholibros rejoice in it and congratulate each other!

>>22503 Pfft, here you go: https://x.com/jeckpt Soon, I'll be dealing a few more crushing blows to the accounts of those lying bastards whose fetish isn't cute lolis and shotas, but money.