/delicious/ - Cake

It just tastes better.

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

US Election Thread

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.


(663.54 KB 612x792 etc+b1+cover.png)

I'm heavily considering turning my SFW loli comic into NSFW Anonymous 04/29/2024 (Mon) 02:47:08 Id: b25020 No. 43571
I need advice, I've been working on this webcomic for years now, keeping it 100% SFW and family friendly. It's been a nice journey, but honestly after all these years of effort I still don't have a lot of success. Then, a few months ago I made an account on baraag because users on Twitter were cancelling the comic even though it's SFW just because it has underage main characters. On baraag I got nothing but good friends, followers and even artists making NSFW fanart of my characters. The NSFW fanart gave me more views and even monetary success (the monthly income for the project literally duplicated since) in a few months than all the work in years. So I'm really considering embracing the NSFW side, create a different brand with the same characters and do it. I'm worried about the long-time supporters, friends and artists who won't be okay with NSFW of the loli characters though. Should I do it anyway?
It's your thing so you decide the form it's going to take but know this, whichever way you want to go with it, go all the way or don't bother. Do not half ass it with anything between.
>>43571 >users on Twitter were cancelling the comic even though it's SFW just because it has underage main characters They're retarded. But that's normies for you. Here's what you need to understand now: that situation isn't gonna get better. >On baraag I got nothing but good friends, followers and even artists making NSFW fanart of my characters. And that's what you're an artist for. I think your answer is clear. Idiots pushed you to change the content, so at least they can be thanked for that.
>>43571 It would be weird to turn a SFW comic NSFW all of a sudden. Couldn't you create a separate story and characters instead?
Another thought would be, "why change what is working?" Let the fan artists do their thing. Encourage them even, but keep doing the comic the way that you are. That is the formula that works for the studio-made stuff.
>>43596 That.
>>43571 Add really subtle sexual undertones, nothing explicit.
>>43596 Seconding the idea of separate side story comics going hardcore + supplemental/AU smut like what some furry artists do. >>43615 Opposing any and all ideas of cockteasing.
I think we should all read the comic before offering advise. Because after we've read it we'll have a much better understanding of everything. Which is why I'm reading it now, but should it be posted here?
>>43621 OP should have posted it or at least a link to it.
Yo, Sugar, I was just reading this comic because of this thread, and please don't change anything. This story is actually good. Yeah, the wand looks a bit ridiculous, but it is a fun narrative. Let the fan artists do their thing, but do not make this into a porno. It's a good comic, and there are not enough of those around.
>users on Twitter were cancelling the comic even though it's SFW just because it has underage main characters Very ironic, considering they mentioned they used to be an anti themselves a while back, though they have changed their views since then, which is very good and all. But man is it ironic that the antis are now coming after him for his comic that is not even NSFW.
>>43891 First they came for the Democrat activismographers, and I said nothing because I was not a Democrat activismographer. Then they came for the dapper gentleman modeling photographers, and I said nothing because I was not a dapper gentleman modeling photographer. Then they came for the artists who make images based on real children, and again I said nothing because I did not make art based on real children. Then they came for the artists whose creations might have possibly been inspired by real children or have had AI that used photographic images of clothed children. Again I said nothing. When they came for the cartoonists--as we all knew they eventually would--there was no one left to speak for me.
>>43895 Ain't it the truth for them cartoonists in Britain, New Zealand, Canada, France, Estonia, Italy, Denmark, Norway, etc. They all have laws that criminalize cartoons and drawings, and no one is willing to speak for them.
>>43897 And folks in the United States can enjoy their obscenity laws. LOL 1st Amendment. You should have seen it coming after what happened to the 4th Amendment.
>>43899 At least drawings aren't criminalized.
well I'll support it
>>43571 Well randomly changing it so drastically will drive away anyone who was there for the comic itself so you'll just have the coomer fans left, seems to me the better alternative would be to make an alt and make your own nsfw fanart/comic spinoff, nobody has to know it's even you drawing it unless you decide to tell them, and this way both the nsfw and sfw crowds get what they want even though your output will slow down it seems better than just alienating your actual fans for more money
Solution seems simple: Post the lewd stuff exclusively to Baraag and keep posting the SFW version everywhere else. Refuse to address it if your existing fans complain.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply