>>9895
Since you clearly do not know how the German economy functioned and probably think the jewish written "Vampire Economy" is real.
https://germaneconomicmiracle.wordpress(Please use archive.today)/
https://archive.is/bvv23
https://www.bitchute(Please use archive.today)/video/wGiDtmp3GeQs/ (The Nazi Economy by Cultured Thug, I shared this with you when you were shilling on 8ch 2 years ago, nothings changed eh? Stilling counting on the stupidity of your opponant?)
Recovery and post 33 recovery.
https://nationalvanguard(Please use archive.today)/2017/09/germanys-1923-hyperinflation-a-private-affair/
https://archive.is/fVN9P
"When I listened to Gottfried Feder’s first lecture on breaking down the thralldom of interest [in June 1919],
I knew at once that here we had a theoretic truth which will be of immense importance for the future of the German nation."
"Feder’s captivating ideas were about money. At the base of his monetary views was the idea that the state should create and control its money supply through a nationalized central bank rather than have it created by privately owned banks, to whom interest would have to be paid. From this view was derived the conclusion that finance had enslaved the population, by usurping the nation’s control of money.
Feder’s monetary theories could easily have originated from the work of German monetary theorists such as George Knapp,
whose book The State Theory of Money(1905) is still one of the classics in the monetary area. Right on page one, Knapp nails it:"
Gottfried Feder had a variety of influences and rejected the economic policies of Marxism, him and Hitler agreeing with with some of Marx's critique of international finnance or Capitalism in general does not dispel that.
Das Kapital was an interesting read imo, because he makes good points. It is however all of Karl Marx's (a jew btw) solutions that are pants on head retarded. You are even willfully disingenous in your post.
>I have learned a great deal from Marxism, as I do not hesitate to admit. I don’t mean their tiresome social doctrine or the materialist conception of history, or their absurd ‘marginal utility’ theories and so on. But I have learnt from their methods.
>I don’t mean their tiresome social doctrine or the materialist conception of history, or their absurd ‘marginal utility’ theories and so on. But I have learnt from their methods.
He straight up rejects their actual policy and moves on to talk about the methods they use.
THE METHODS DISINGENOUS KIKE!
>Look at the workers’ sports clubs, the industrial cells, the mass demonstrations, the propaganda leaflets written specially for the comprehension of masses; all these new methods of political struggle are essentially Marxist in origin.
Essentially he recognized why their propaganda was effective and how they organized with leaflets designed for fucking retards and mass demonstrations. Among also creating groups
for workers that were seperate from other state and private methods and gained them more support. This isn't an endorcement of Marxism you brainless toothless kikel,
it's very obviously observing what propaganda and social methods of spreading an ideology work!
>The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.
Correct and quite based for saying so. Soft cushy Social Dems and Champaign socialists are seldom of a hard working mentality. Lot of former Commies, whom were duped working class,
swapped when they realized that Hitler's way was better than theirs and protected both private rights and the collective interests of a Nation.
Todays Commies however are exclusively jobless faggots, degenerates, and other neer-do-wells. I'd argue that we do not do this in the future because of the nature of current Commies.
In current Year the working class doesn't buy into their propaganda as easily, on account of it being spread by non-workers, Unishitters, etc and is overwhelmingly sympathetic to ideas that Nationalists/Fascists hold instead. As well as being more Patriotic in general.
>As National Socialists we see our program in our flag. In the red we see the social idea of the movement.
You know damn well that this is taken out of context.
>As National Socialists, we see our program in our flag. In red we see the social idea of the movement, in white the nationalistic idea, in the swastika the mission of the struggle for the victory of the Aryan man, and, by the same token, the victory of the idea of creative work, which as such always has been and always will be anti-Semitic.
Is the actual full quote. For one, the colors are exactly the same as the German Imperial flag; Red, White, Black. For the next, red was referred to the Social or people/Nation aspect of Germany. It
very clearly and obviously as stated by NS propaganda, Blood. The truly ironic thing about this piece of disingenous faggotry is the fact that this quote comes from Chapter 7
of Mein Kampf which deals principly with the struggle against the "Red Front" or Communists.
https://mondopolitico(Please use archive.today)/library/meinkampf/v2c7.htm
>The red color of our posters in itself drew them to our meeting halls. The run-of-the-mill bourgeoisie were horrified that we had seized upon the red of the Bolsheviks, and they regarded this as all very ambiguous. The German national souls kept privately whispering to each other the suspicion that basically we were nothing but a species of Marxism, perhaps Marxists, or rather, socialists in disguise. For to this very day these scatterbrains have not understood the difference between socialism and Marxism. Especially when they discovered that, as a matter of principle, we greeted in our meetings no 'ladies and gentlemen' but only 'national comrades,' and among ourselves spoke only of party comrades, the Marxist spook seemed demonstrated for many of our enemies. How often we shook with laughter at these simple bourgeois scare-cats, at the sight of their ingenious witty guessing games about our origin, our intentions, and our goal.
>We chose the red color of our posters after careful and thorough reflection, in order to provoke the Left, to drive them to indignation and lead them to attend our meetings if only to break them up, in order to have some chance to speak to the people.
The predominately red color choice was initially made to provoke Leftists into attending their meetings and maybe even convert a few.
(You) kill yourself kike!