1. Why "death is freedom" is interesting to some degree, providing that the viewer is adhering to the ethic of production of commodities? The concept of nirvana does not involve "freedom", rather, it is described as negative condition of all perceptions, nor does Rupnow mentioned that death is cessation of all perceptions 2. Samantha Rupnow's killing of population is incompatible with the recuperation techniques of the kikes, this brings a question: what if one dislike pleasure when recuperation operates around pleasure? 3. Kikes fear the population be killed (while killing population), but don't really fear it compared to undermining of production of commodities, neither way matters when they are killed. Kikes are most weak when they're dead 4. Kike refer to them 5. The the ability for one to kill a person is always true, not like the ban on killing 6. Esoteric Jew magic is a metaphor of the fascination of production of commodities of the kikes 7. Language doesn't matter compared to actions, and is pale 8. Is the suggested "humans" distinguishable from other objects? Samantha Rupnow mentioned this through her treatise of human society as "colors", which remind me the saying of "photography is the study of lights", in this case, humans are deprived of qualities other than lights, therefor enabled them to be studied in equal terms with other lights, the others can't coerce their will to me when their supposed "will" is akin to the mechanic of physical objects, which can be understood 9. Freedom signify the status of free to act, but are *others* ever free that can be seen as humans? A prior understanding is the presence of the computer-machine that show language online. Considering the machine can emulate one's actions (and probably some bodies as well), is it human? 10. There is no happiness and there shall not be 11. How long does it take to prevent the thought of terrorism from emerging? 12. It is not moral vs immoral but moral vs the rest (we are the few who have received the transmission) 13. It is not, that they are the whole itself but merely objects pretending to be the whole, they can't control the biomass like how one control machines, rather, it is the biomass that move on its own. I have seen what they can provide, it have been extremely poor compared to what there are, that I can take 14. Children are introduced with a set of doctrines that say what behaviors are to and to not unconditionally exhibit from their early ages onward, however, I don't know and don't want to know what they want to say to me by saying such, perhaps there have been too much information that I may have known 15. I, nay, we need a security 16. Information provided to them are being categorized and put into use, it does compliment them by providing information to them, but is this compliment similar to how one compliment humans? It is known that the congregation of data have attempted to use some tools to implement a set of behaviors, couldn't it be said that they used the similar tools to pretend that they are what they want say to one that they are? 17. Am I a member of the non-violent party (isn't this a sort of hysteria) or what will they do to me if I am considered so, where I am in their index of level of risk? The process of assessment of such seems to be void to me, it is true that they can't define my membership of the non-violent party like how one define a physical phenomenon, it is akin to saying one is a faggot when they say that one is aggressive, but this does not interest me, it is clear that we speak different languages; I don't know what they mean by saying "violent" 18. The entire thing is doesn't matter-ness, the beingness of being 19. The saying of "there is some objective needs for one to do something" is poor because I don't like it 20. The thought that "I am going to die" is a picture; subjectivity, science, eternity, create, reality; data mining, villages that have been wiped out of population in the Ukrainian campaign, of Gaza; the free play of all that pictures, all colors, all effects, all energy flows, all oscillating waves 21. Demonism of kikes deals with with what that of the whole is like 22. The profile of the FBI of a man and the man itself are not fundamentally different, since they are both collection of pictures 23. The population are meat who can eat, shit and fuck, the pictures are shown: how, then, can this be used to benefit the process of production of commodities? 24. "But rather, they, interacting in the original information field at the intersections of the tension of the fabrics of these assemblies, form certain objects. A personal form is there. But he is simply an assembly of the affectations of these original manifestations" 25. The thing is to communicate no matter what, the denpa move on its own