>>11977
AI is merely a tool. The problem is abusing that tool. I use it often when proof-reading CSS and JS code, since I'm a complete amateur at that and a computer would know how to correct errors in syntax. It's a useful tool for making sure ones writing is consistent. When writing a long chapter or story sometimes inconsistencies crop up (character descriptions, prior lines of dialogue, or thematic inconsistency etc.) and it can point these out, allowing me to go back and correct that. But if you give an AI full control or tell it to write for you... it fails, with great obviousness. For example, if I took the story idea for the High School Sienna AU you gave me and fed that into an AI it would turn into complete ass, because the AI doesn't know when to use description properly, when to say what things, when to NOT say something, etc. It would just turn into a Mexican Soap Opera, a very shoddy Mexican Soap Opera.
Edit: A close analogy would be CGI. As a supplement to practical effects it's great. But pure CGI almost always sucks, because it doesn't feel real, there's no haptic feedback. AI generation for writing is similar, it imitates an amalgamation of broad writing but there's no human connection to it.
Edited last time by An0nym00se on 01/08/2026 (Thu) 05:04:09.