>>44833 >They're sandniggers that were turned into a "people" by the USSR Hmm, where have I heard THIS pilpul tactic before? Do you only use it on /pol/, or are there other right-wing sites you post it on?

>>44835 >>44834 >the jews where NOT phillistines It's awfully obvious you didn't click on a single damn source I provided. >the people of gaza are jordanians If that's true, why isn't Jordan allow those people to return: archive.ph/I2yfM <Jordan’s King Abdullah II gave a similar message a day earlier, saying, “No refugees in Jordan, no refugees in Egypt.” >More reading Funny thing. First is that Kikpedia is not a source. The site's been known for years to be extremely inaccurate in it's articles for the purposes of pushing a political agenda. Second is that you're telling me to "get some reading", yet you're refusing to read any of the links I provided, one of which I regretfully included being the Kikepedia page, but I guess I shouldn't worry about that now since you're telling that the site is "A-okay" for quoting.

>>44847 >If that's true, why isn't Jordan allow those people to return: Because they already did it once and they damn near toppled the government for being in israels pocket. You're too ignorant on the subject. Palestinians and Jordanians are the same arabs. Ethnically the same. https://archive.today/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_Palestinians https://archive.today/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/#:~:text=The%20comparison%20with%20other%20Mediterranean,Egyptians%2C%20Armenians%2C%20and%20Iranians. https://archive.today/https://www.hrw.org/report/2010/02/01/stateless-again/palestinian-origin-jordanians-deprived-their-nationality#:~:text=More%20than%20half%20of%20the%206.3%20million,persons%20of%20Palestinian%20origin%20have%20Jordanian%20citizenship. I don't give a fuck what you think is or isnt a source, you're wrong. Palestinians and Jordanians share genetic lineage and you can't prove otherwise, you could if you would provide a study showing they're ethnically different, but you can't.

>>44847 >>https://archive.today/https://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/article/when-palestine-meant-israel/ >https://archive.today/https://ulondon.academia.edu/DavidJacobson David jacobson totally not a jew claiming palestine doesnt come form philistinia TOTALLY NOT A SELF SERVING ARGUMENT OY VEY LMAO entire argument discarded you're a jew. Lets look at your other source it Its even more hilarious and self-serving! -archive.ph/HXB0C#Controversies_and_disputes >References to Jews in Europe as Palestinians European Jews were commonly considered an "Oriental" people in many of their host countries, usually as reference to their ancestral origins in the Middle East. A prominent example of this was the 18th-century Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant, who referred to European Jews as "Palestinians living among us."[10][11] >Israeli Jewish usage >Ben-Zion Meir Hai Uziel (born in 1880 in Jerusalem) was the Sephardi chief rabbi of Mandatory Palestine from 1939 to 1948, and of Israel from 1948 to 1954. >Mordechai Eliyahu (born in 1929 in Jerusalem) was a prominent rabbi, >Uri Davis, an Israeli citizen, >Tali Fahima, an Israeli pro-Palestinian activist, >Actor, director and activist Juliano Mer-Khamis, the son of an Israeli Jewish mother and a Palestinian father totally not a self-serving argument being made here Shut up jew

>>44858 >Because they already did it once and they damn near toppled the government for being in israels pocket. Care to rephrase that? Are you saying that the Palestinians are a MOSSAD operation just like ISIS (In which case, why do you care if they're being exterminated? They're a bunch of useful idiots.), or are you saying that Jordan is sympathetic towards Israel, in which case... >Palestinians and Jordanians are the same arabs. Ethnically the same. >Palestinians and Jordanians share genetic lineage and you can't prove otherwise Then there must be a reason why Jordan refuses to allow in Palestinian refugees in the first place. Could it perhaps be because, I don't know, they have ZERO legitmate claims and only exists as a disruptive element in the region? In that case, again, why do you care how they're treated? They're a terrorist organization.

>>44860 >Care to rephrase that? Are you saying that the Palestinians are a MOSSAD operation just like ISIS That was many decades before isis even existed you really are an ignorant jew >or are you saying that Jordan is sympathetic towards Israel, in which case... Is the jordanian government not a signatory to the abraham accords? Pissrael has no legitimate claim to be a state of jews and for jews in the region. Shut up jew

>>44861 >That was many decades before isis even existed So the Palestinians WERE created by MOSSAD? >Is the jordanian government not a signatory to the abraham accords? From what I can find, no. In fact, here's how they view the entire matter: archive.ph/zBWaK <Daoud Kuttab, a Jordanian columnist with Al-Monitor and Arab News, told JI, however, that the Abraham Accords does not hold great significance for Jordan because “there is already a peace treaty with Israel and that is more advanced than normalization.” <What bothers the Jordanians, he said, is that they constantly feel belittled by Israel and see many of the Jewish states’ promises to its neighbor being broken. <“Jordanians feel that Israel looks down on them, that it does not take Jordan seriously,” Kuttab continued, listing multiple promises and guarantees made during previous meet-ups and summits between Abdullah and Netanyahu that were not fulfilled or kept. <He noted a set of understandings reached between the leaders in 2014 with mediation from then-U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in which Israel committed to preventing radical and extremist Jews from repeatedly visiting the Temple Mount. <“Radical people have ulterior motives, they are not coming as tourists, they are coming to change the status,” Kuttab noted. “The Jordanians are right in worrying that the repeat visitors and extremist visitors are not coming to visit like any normal tourist would come but they have these ulterior motives, and that worries the Jordanians.” <In a brief published last month by the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, Jonathan Schanzer, the think tank’s senior vice president for research, noted that Jordan’s ongoing frustration towards its neighbor to the west is working counter to the spirit of the Accords, not only unsettling the region but also hindering U.S. national security interests. <“Ties between Jordan and Israel are currently at a low point,” he wrote, outlining Jordan’s social and economic woes, as well as the dominance of the Palestinian issue on the political country’s agenda. “A return to the fundamentals, with a concurrent embrace of the new regional order, are key to a prosperous and secure future for both American allies.” So here brings forward the question: if Jordinians and Palestinians are the same people, and Jordan is increasingly untrustworthy of Israel because of them failing to maintain already-existing treaties and argeements, why is the Jordan government refusing to "help" the Palestinians? Not to the point of armament or anything like that, but just allowing in refugees like the women and children "stuck" in the middle of a warzone.

>>44862 >So the Palestinians WERE created by MOSSAD? man you lost the argument so hard

>>44847 >It's awfully obvious you didn't click on a single damn source I provided. Of course not, why should I read sources from a stupid lying nigger like you?

>>44863 >>44875 You retardation all fall apart when considering the fact Palestinian DNA matches with the DNA of Bronze Age population and the Philistines that came afterward. They have existed way before the Israelites and constantly existed on that land. When Assyrian scattered the Israelites they continue to existed, when Babylonian did it they continue to existed, and when Roman did it they continue to existed. They are not some random group of subhuman given the title Palestinian by Soviet intelligence to attack Israel.

>>44895 thanks for that

>>44895 That image doesn't say waht you think it says. If I'm reading it right, here's how the Middle East should be "divided" between Palestinians and Kikes.

>>44895 >>44902 Excuse me, had to make a little correction.

>>44902 >>44903 I think the entire middle east should belong to the white man, except for Mecca which should be irradiated.

>>44902 The image says the Palestinians are descendant of the first civilization build in Levant. You can not spin it any other way. >>44915 If White man serve Jews then he deserve nothing along with every other race but going to the blender and making way for a new race as even they are prove them useless.

>>44937 *proven themselves

>>44937 >If White man serve Jews then he deserve nothing along with every other race but going to the blender and making way for a new race as even they are prove them useless. Every race serves the Jews to some extent, including yours. This is ZOGworld after all. Jews use you pakis as a bioweapon against the anglosax as revenge for not giving them Palestine sooner.

>>21793 It was a pagan Wotanist named David lane that came up with the slogan 1488. said Wotan also stood for Will Of The Aryan Nation

>>44937 >The image says the Palestinians are descendant of the first civilization build in Levant. For how far and for how long is that game played? Does a "peoples" have eternal rights over a land, or is there a certain point where they lose it? What about if they leave? What if they sell it to someone else? What if they're conquered? What if theu're relocated elsewhere? And so on. Take the example of Ukraine. You have a lot of people arguing that they have " no right" to that territory because it was established by the USSR, who imported millions of Russians, but the Ukrainians were there first. Or what about all the territories in dispute with West Taiwan. They never had any claim to Tibet. Korea they occupied. Manchuria was always it's own nation. Not to mention that the CCP are consisting of "Han Chinese" who habe zero genetical or historical heritage with the "traditional" Han Chinese that have since fled to other territories. What about America as well? Should we be expected to forfieght all of our lands, even ones we gained through legitmate trade and agreements, because the American Indians arrived first? But also what about the American-Indians who have been slaughtering each other for millennia in an endless game in cinquest? So, again, how do you want to play this game?

>>44949 >For how far and for how long is that game played? Does a "peoples" have eternal rights over a land, or is there a certain point where they lose it? What about if they leave? What if they sell it to someone else? What if they're conquered? What if theu're relocated elsewhere? These would all be well and good arguments and questions if it wasn't for the jews creating a country and government in the levant guided by zionist principles in order to rule europe, america and complete the circle of white genocide. jews dont deserve shit but the hot end of an oven.

>>44950 >if it wasn't for the jews Do you have any other arguments?

>>44952 Do you have a counter argument? Im willing to hear you out.

>>44954 >Do you have a counter argument? What race is Bill Gates? And Klaus Schwab?And Jeff Bezos? And Robert Muller? And the Clintons? >Im willing to hear you out. No, you're not. In fact, I find a little funny that, in another thread, you're dismissed arguments because they sounded like they came from Alex Jones despite the sources provided, yet here you're declaring that the problem is "always" the Kikes and going on about "white genocide" as if they're the one and "only" group who's pushing for that.

>>44958 I mean yeah, the problem IS the jews >What race is Bill Gates? And Klaus Schwab?And Jeff Bezos? And Robert Muller? And the Clintons? This is what you call "Front goys", the gentiles in jews service who idiot conservatives point to because theyre too chicken shit to call out jewish power. The problem is 100% the jews, not my fault you can't see deal with reality.

>>44963 >I mean yeah, the problem IS the jews So once the Kikes are all wiped out, every single problem with the world is going to end. Is that your thesis? Actually, wait a second, before I present that, how far does this go? Because a lot of people have some Jewish blood in them. It's always been a joke that even your average /pol/ user has Jewish heritage "somewhere" in their family tree. So, first, who's considered a "Jew"? Second, and to my original question, do you literally and unironically believe that every single "problem" in the world is going to end the moment every single "Jew" is extermianted? >This is what you call "Front goys" <Honorary Kikes Okay, your argument is shit.

>>44973 My argument is not shit, its actually very objective and in fact you proved it, you refuse to call out jewish power. You don't even acknowledge it. >do you literally and unironically believe that every single "problem" in the world is going to end the moment every single "Jew" is extermianted? Yes 100% starting with you.

>>44974 >My argument is not shit You're arguing that society and the world will forever remain shit until we wipe out every single one of the Kikes. And NOT JUST the people religiously or genetically Jewish, but also the people that you deem to be "Honorary Kikes" through some arbitrary metric. To put it simply, your idea is "Critical Jew Theory". The exact same platform as CRT, except with "Kikes" being the oppressors instead of whites. To put it simply, you're a Communist.

>>44975 >To put it simply, your idea is "Critical Jew Theory". Yes I am very critical of jews I like that, thats my ideology now.

>>44975 > To put it simply, your idea is "Critical Jew Theory". The exact same platform as CRT, except with "Kikes" being the oppressors instead of whites. Ah, the classic "Pro-whites are the REAL woke!" argument. Elon Lost btw

>>44976 >Yes I am very critical of jews archive.ph/wtZqR <Critical consciousness, the core of social justice teaching, is a heightened awareness of the world and the power structures that shape it. So you're a social justice warrior. Congratulations, you're the very evil you're declaring you're against. >>44978 >Pro-whites are the REAL woke! They always were. They can never define what makes someone "white", or suffer from cognative dissonance as they try to exclude certain groups they don't like (Like the Irish and the Poles). Even then, the biggest irony that keeps cropping is that the "biggest" so-called "Pro White" people aren't even white. Dan Burros is a classic example, but if you need more recent (((coincidences))), there's this: archive.ph/JspVv And this: archive.ph/1PoW9 And this: archive.ph/9SypS AND this: archive.ph/64Dfz Not to mention ALL the times it's also revealed that so-called "Pro-White" groups are actually government honeypots like here: archive.ph/cqIRP And here: archive.ph/0BOKr And here: archive.ph/jd29o And here: archive.ph/Te9C7 In fact, there's an entire history of how all this "Pro-white" shit is outright fake and nothing more than a government psyop: archive.ph/qr4IA

>>44979 you already told me you dont have the balls or the brains to be critical of jews, Ill do it for you dont worry. Ill do the work.

>>44980 >you already told me you dont have the balls or the brains to be critical of jews No, it's because I'm not a fucking Gnostic seeking to overthrow and become the demiurge. It's like calling someone a "coward" because they don't believe in the Nordic traditions that you need to die in battle in order to enter heaven. It's a religion and belief system that I don't adhere to whatsoever.

>>44985 >No, it's because I'm not a fucking Gnostic seeking to overthrow and become the demiurge. So youll explicitly use any metaphor than ever calling out the jews and jewish power directly huh? are you afraid of jews or something?

>>44978 >"you can't outtrain being retarded" >imports subhumans that literally consume feces, trains them instead

>>44986 >So youll explicitly use any metaphor It's not a metaphor, and it's funny that you think that.

>Gen Z Is Returning To Religion. Why? archive.ph/qIQcU <In the past, the younger generation tended to rebel against the religious norms of their parents. Young people’s resistance to the rules and institutions of religion was assumed and expected. But that’s not the case anymore. <According to a recent article from Axios, members of Gen Z—which includes young people born between 1997 and 2012—are actually more likely to go to weekly religious services than millennials and young Gen Xers. <According to some reports, church attendance has quadrupled amongst Gen Zers in recent years. <America witnessed a steady decline in Christianity from the 1970s through the 1990s, with only about 46 percent of Americans born in the ’90s identifying as Christian. Yet that falling trend has abruptly halted, likely due to a surge in religiosity amongst young Americans, particularly young men. Some Catholic dioceses, for instance, have reported a 70 percent increase in converts this year compared to last, and many of these new converts are people in their teens and twenties. The winds have changed. <The phenomenon is not restricted to just the United States, either. Throughout the West—which has for so long been the graveyard of Christian civilization, dominated by an aggressive liberal secularism—there are signs of a religious renaissance. In Britain, for example, the percentage of people aged 18 to 24 who attend church at least once a month spiked from 4 percent in 2018 to 16 percent in 2025. This included a 21 percent gain among young men. Meanwhile, across the channel in France, the Catholic Church baptized more than 10,000 adults at the 2025 Easter Vigil—a 45 percent increase over baptisms in 2024, and a 90 percent increase over 2023. <Even in the Netherlands—which is certainly no bastion of Catholicism—priests are noticing an increase in young people attending Mass. According to Dutch Cardinal Willem Eijk, “The numbers are not huge in the Netherlands, but we hear these noises from almost every pastor. It is clear that something is happening. We also see it reflected in the interest in the priesthood: there are many new applications.”