>>21793 well Paganism is effectively dead and only done by hobbyists, "quirky" types, and the absolute dismally small amount of genuine believers. Christianity meanwhile still holds a large grip on the psyche of western humans, but, it has been curtailed by the rise of liberal governments/societies/thinking and tolerance of the general population to new ideas. I'd say more and more people are religious in name only and mainly live by their country's rules and their peoples' social standards.

>>21793 why not just get along?

The Globalist aka Jewish plans make total sense when you realize that their goals are simply to drag as many people to hell with them as possible.

>>21934 Way too hard to get along when your religions are so at odds with eachother. People can very easily get tribal over much smaller differences (see: different christian denominations), so imagine the amount of bloodshed that would occur once external threats are driven away and whatever temporary alliance that was created between christians and pagans to fight said threats fell apart.

>>21939 Jews != globalists, globalists != royal elites It's Babylonian demon cults, Baal. They invented the Abrahamic religions as servants. He simply adopted a new name, YHWH. It's more about preventing paradise from manifesting, by diverting humanity into a false awakening. A dead, soulless "eternal life", basically the merging of man with AI and machinery. An ironic fate considering these bodies are already capable of much more without any inorganic modifications.

>>21793 >Christianity and paganism None knows where it's roots run.

>>21793 Neither side have any reason to be friendly, but they both hate jews and liberals and what-not, so best to focus on dealing with those before fighting. These threads never go well, it's always just endless shit-flinging.

>>21793 >>21800 The thing most people, even other pagans need to understand about paganism is that it's not a traditional ideology with churches or an established doctrine. What we're doing is a reconstruction based on what we know of the beliefs of our pre-christian ancestors. It has to be esoteric, for people searching for something beyond Christianity. You're not "pagan" just because you've read the Eddas. At best the Eddas give you some context for the runes. This is how it was in the Third Reich too when the majority of Germans where Christian.

>>21793 I don't think neopaganism is real or worth taking seriously. There might be a tiny minority of legitimate people who actually believe Odin is real and prayer and sacrifice to him do something, but most are just edgy retards or literal feds. Their only use is to our enemies who amplify them to make sure the White conservative Christians that should be a nationalist party's natural base associate nationalism with unpleasant spergs who rabidly hate them. The same trick is done to associate any opposition to feminism with people like Elliot Rogers.

>>31326 While I meditated, the fire burned

>>21793 Both are dead ends for nationalism Paganism is too extreme and filters all (Hello, I just arrived from Cuckchan, please bully me)s Christianity is too Jewish and always ends up watering down any nationalist movement The only solution is something philosophic like Deism or Platonism

>>31347 >What we're doing is a reconstruction based on what we know of the beliefs of our pre-christian ancestors in other words it's a larp. fax 1: all of the ancestors you can name were christian fax 2: if your pagan ancestors saw your larp they wouldn't recognize it as their own religion fax 3: because it's larp and not a real religion you don't actually believe in your gods, which your ancestors would also have found abhorrent

>>21793 For what its worth I'm currently reading revolt against the modern world by Evola.

>>21793 A religion needs to be something people sincerely believe in, not just a fashion statement. I don't approve of Christianity myself but the impression I get of pagans is that they don't actually believe pagan gods are real and just see pagan larp as a way to get back at Christians, and that's pretty gay.

>>23486 Are you unfamiliar with how the men and women of faith in the Bible were strict enemies of Baal and all the other demon gods? How the Israelites strayed into worshipping a golden calf or sacrificed their children to Baal or had temple boy prostitutes and God and the prophets were very much against all of that? How Daniel wouldn't eat the fancy food in Babylon?

>>21793 Sure this will help you

>>21793 Any teaching that says that I should not kill my enemies is automatically wrong.

Christianity is jewish subversion snd should be rejected prima facie

>>37319 mutt cope. we still celebrate pagan holidays in traditional pagan ways here. we literally have pagan bonfires and a pagan pilgrimage that needs to be performed at least once in your lifetime (muslims stole this idea) and other non christian shit. also every single aspect of christianity, every tiny detail was directly stolen for paganism anyway, like blessing things with holy water for example. christians larp as pagans and celebrate our holidays and give them a christian spin. we know how the religions worked back then and we still practice them to this very day. cope and seethe kike shill

>>36495 what word was filtered by the cuckchan thing?

You all keep looking for a brainwashing program to get the results you desire, but that's not what is needed, especially since ideology pales brutally in comparison to the influence of genetics on behavior. Second, religion and spirituality is a personal thing. The more organized they are, the more superficial they become. We need not followers, but people that can lead themselves. Stop looking for ideologies and start looking in the mirror for improvement.

>>43364 I think it was the N word.

I have a serious question: Why is it relevant in the first place? These debates don't exist outside of the internet, since pagans in general and especially Right Wing pagans as a demographic barely exist outside of the internet, most of the pagans irl are new age hippy larpers. And the problem is a lot (not all of course) of the neopagans aren't actual theists that believe in the gods, but instead follow Jordan Peterson/Varg style "the gods and the supernatural are archetypes and metaphors reflecring humans" they are fundamentally atheists that are not following their ancestor's religions so this blows the "return to our roots" argument out of the water since they are not worshipping the gods that their ancestors clearly believed in. It's not even a return to tradition it's just atheist right wingers seeking some traditional identity or spirituality to rally behind but wearing paganism as a skinsuit since they oppose christianity and don't use it instead. There are also atheists doing this with christianity as well, but most christians are actual theists still. The actual relevant irl demographics in the right wing are christians and atheists

>>43465 see >>43362

>>43362 Pagan just meant redneck to rural cityfaga of Rome.

>>43364 Wrote the post a month ago, but I think it was n-0-r-m-i-e

>>21793 >DEUS VULT

>>44519 >DEUS VULT >destroys Christian empires that are now ruled over by Muslims What did they mean by this?

>>44683 violent sand monkeys ook ook ooga booga

>>21793 Christianity preaches useful teachings about uniting with people that are similar to you, and work together under one God to purge those who will harm you (those who are different). The pagan religions preach useless fallacies about "be what you want', "muh freedom" and "choose one fake god among many and mimic his/her behavior", producing only fractured individuals who can't (and won't) cooperate even if their lives depended on it, creating openings for them to be slaughtered by their enemies who work together, united. Christianity wins. Simply because it works. unlike the retarded pagan fallacies about freedom that only lead to self=destruction. Pagans are like trannies/abominations: mentally ill inferior subhumans who pretend to be what they aren't, and once they realize that they can never change who they really are, they either kill themselves or let others kill them due to others being functional human beings, united in collective ambition. Stick with the winners. Stick with Christianity.

>>44691 You mean useful teachings such as zionism and letting jews run everything and have infinity nigger migration because it makes Jesus happy? Ill keep my fedora. neither the catholic church nor the orthodox church seem to be helping much of anyone. >inb4 not real christianity

>>44691 >Christianity preaches useful teachings about uniting with people that are similar to you, and work together under one God to purge those who will harm you (those who are different) It doesn't say that at all. The fuck are you talking about? >The pagan religions preach useless fallacies about "be what you want', "muh freedom" and "choose one fake god among many and mimic his/her behavior" That's not true either. The only people who believe that unironically are Pagan-LARPers who aren't even following the pagan beliefs they claim to be following. >>44693 >and have infinity nigger migration because it makes Jesus happy? Jesus purged the Pharisees from the Temple and credited Romans for having even greater faith than many of his own people. Christ isn't as cut-and-dry as may morons try to make it out to be. >inb4 not real christianity What does the damn book say? Simple as that! What does it say? Who said it? When was it said? Where was it said? Why was it said? And how does it play into the context and events regarding everything else?

>>44740 Jesus says let the immigrants in bigot.

>>44743 I'm pretty sure Jesus never made no AI slop

>>44745 >Jesus never made no AI slop Of course not. On top of being a pirate and a zombie, he was also a carpenter.

>>44745 no one from the bronze age made AI slop, doesnt stop christians from using the bible to justify infinity nigger migration.

>>44752 >doesnt stop christians from using the bible to justify infinity nigger migration You also have a lot of so-called "Christians" who also support trannies despite homosexuality and crossdressing being deemed a sin in the Old Testament. What does the actual book say on the matter?

>>21793 I favor the one that supports the idea of the return of divinely chosen ancestors through their bloodlines and final death for the dishonorable instead of a clear and definite paradises or torments in the afterlife.

>>44757 >'Christmas' correct. Actual Christians don't celebrate the pagan festivals like Christmas or Easter. >return to pagan >in current year smh. There's a good reason merchant owned TV has numerous pagan-centric shows, but not strong Christianity. They hate Christ and Christianity, and if they can't outright delete it, they'll dilute it with poison like >>44753 Most of the infamous 109 times was FROM Christian societies who knew what Rev.2:9, 3:9 meant.

>>44753 >You also have a lot of so-called "Christians" who also support trannies despite homosexuality and crossdressing being deemed a sin in the Old Testament. >What does the actual book say on the matter? Well, what does it say? there's nothing about being a tranny that precludes you from being a christian, which churches are openly anti-gay and anti-tranny? The not real christian ones? the prot ones? Because you can be gay or a tranny and get communion in a catholic church, no catholic church is going to kick you out.

>>44774 >there's nothing about being a tranny that precludes you from being a christian Yes, there is. Being a tranny means that you subscribe to the religion of Queer Theory, which is itself an offshot of Gnosticism, a heresy Christians have been denouncing since Day One.

>>44775 Now you're making shit up. you dont need to be a gnostic to be a tranny and i doubt most trannies even know what gnosticism is. You can 100% be a tranny and go to church, the ones who would kick someone out for being a tranny are in the minority, e-christians just lose on this point.

>>44785 >Now you're making shit up archive.ph/nRpxa <Unlike gay identity, which, though deliberately proclaimed in an act of affirmation, is nonetheless rooted in the positive fact of homosexual object-choice, queer identity need not be grounded in any positive truth or in any stable reality. As the very word implies, “queer” does not name some natural kind or refer to some determinate object; it acquires its meaning from its oppositional relation to the norm. Queer is by definition whatever is at odds with the normal, the legitimate, the dominant. There is nothing in particular to which it necessarily refers. It is an identity without an essence. >you dont need to be a gnostic to be a tranny By being a tranny, you already are a Gnostic by default. >i doubt most trannies even know what gnosticism is The original form of religion practiced by the Greeks, or even the later Gospel of Thomas, no. The version of Gnosticism they're following is referred to as Queer Theory, which views "normality" as the Demiurge that they must seek to overthrow and replace. >You can 100% be a tranny and go to church Yes, you "can", but you're still a heretic none-the-less. >the ones who would kick someone out for being a tranny are in the minority So?

>>44774 Tranny shit comes from the kikes, and the kikes base all of their true religion (not the shit you hear about) on demonic worship, which is why the kikes have spent thousands of years pushing tranny shit, because some demons are depicted as having both or more genitals, and they believe that it is a way to descend further into evil. How fast they kill themselves is kind of proof of this.

>>43482 Does anyone have answer to this anon?

>>43482 >>44791 >Why is it relevant in the first place? Because religious beliefs effect how people view the world and the things around them. It answers "underlying and fundimental questions" of why we are here, what our purpose is, and how one is to act in the world from a place that is "beyond" ourselves. If you religion is believes that any studying of the world is heretical, then what do you think will happen? What about if your religion believes that reality is only subjective and based upon those who have power? Or what about if your religions has the idea that this world is a Hell that you will forever reincarnate in unless you become enlightened to the divine truths? Or your religion believes that humanity is being contained by some external entity that can only be defeated by having every single person across the globe all thinking the exact same thing? Or your religion believes that humanity is an alien species that has come to dominate an alien world? >The actual relevant irl demographics in the right wing are christians and atheists Actually you have a third faction, Old-Hegelians. You would recognize them as Neo-Cons, or as Christian Nationalists, or as the "Woke Right". They "wear" the veil of being Christian/Atheist, but their religion is fundimentally Socialism/Fascism at it's core.

>>44791 >>43482 The actual answer from my POV is that however effective christianity was at curtailing the jews, their power seeking and ethnic networking to fight against the gentiles for cultural influence, power, resources and even success at breeding is no longer effective, the church -as it exists today- is not just not anti-jewish, it simply facilitates it where ever else it's simply neutral on jews. If any other country was doing to any other people what jews do to palestinians the pope would be screeching bloody murder and excommunicating left and right, but the current pope won't even lift a finger to put a stop to what is effectively naked genocide, whatever you think of "brown people getting bombed" if you're a christian, racialist or otherwise, the catholic church is a failure. And so is the orthodox church and various other protestant denominations for that matter By all means go to church, Jesus might be happy with you and you save your soul, but materially, here on earth it won't change much. >>44788 You could just say the jews push trannyism to get goys to kill themselves and not breed so as not to sound like a schizo and turn people off of anti-semitism. >>44794 >Actually you have a third faction, Old-Hegelians. You would recognize them as Neo-Cons, or as Christian Nationalists, or as the "Woke Right". They "wear" the veil of being Christian/Atheist, but their religion is fundimentally Socialism/Fascism at it's core. This is incredibly wrong because neo-cons are not fascists, objectively they are "ex-trotskyites"/ liberals(jews) with a jingoist foreign policy, neo-conservatism was started by jews, christian nationalism is also a work being done by jews, and however much they play with edgy memes they are also not fascists and are liberal/egaletarians. The people ad groups who fit into the "woke right" category also do not have to be fascists nor does being a facist make someone woke right, what puts people into this category "woke right" is simply agreeing on categorization of people based on race I.E. non-colorblind conservatives or white nationalists and fascists as well.

>>21793 I don't see how many concept of Paganism be not adopted into several people's spiritual views. In certain Islamic culture, there are spirits that represent natural event and their are spirits that drive upon emotions and ideas; a manifestation of those things. So, Christians can have those views as well. The only reason why most Abrahamist can't get along because Jews who are inbred and act entitled want to control nature and get filtered by all sort of plants and their pollens. Olive trees in Levant are being cut down because they are allergic to them.

>>41274 In the opening he immediately went to attack the person and not their beliefs. The ritual he made fun of wasn't even ludicrous and his reaction was overly expressive to it.

>>44519 Jesus and many of his apostle didn't had dark skin like in the depiction.

>>44827 >If any other country was doing to any other people what jews do to palestinians The Israelis ARE Palestinians, smartass. Being a "Palestinian" was synonymous with being a Jew until the 1950's: archive.ph/o1ScR archive.ph/HXB0C#Controversies_and_disputes <A prominent example of this was the 18th-century Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant, who referred to European Jews as "Palestinians living among us." archive.ph/5Cima In fact, if you actually look through the mess that was Middle Eastern border redistribution during the early 20th century, you'll find that Palestine already exists as the nation of Jordan: archive.ph/SWRzk The people in Gaza are not, and never have been, "Palestinians". They're sandniggers that were turned into a "people" by the USSR for the expressed purposes of causing conflicts in the Middle East: archive.ph/JXzL2 And if you want to see how "legitmate" they are to this day, absolutely NONE of the other regions in the Middle East will allow any Gazan "refugees" to cross their border: archive.ph/I2yfM That includes Iran, despite all the "support" they provide: archive.ph/NHdxs >This is incredibly wrong because neo-cons are not fascists, objectively they are "ex-trotskyites"/ liberals(jews) with a jingoist foreign policy So they're "soft" Fascists. >and however much they play with edgy memes they are also not fascists Yes, they are. >The people ad groups who fit into the "woke right" category also do not have to be fascists nor does being a facist make someone woke right Yes, it does.

>>44833 >The Israelis ARE Palestinians, smartass. Being a "Palestinian" was synonymous with being a Jew until the 1950's: cringe and false, the jews where NOT phillistines. the JEWS and PHILLISTINES are two completely different peoples, and after the arab conquest the cisjordanians and jews have been two different peoples. Never have jews been "palestinians" That immanuel kant(a big anti-semite btw) called jews palestinians has no bearing on their ethnic background because PALESTINIAN refers to place of origin, he called them palestinian to not call them israelites or jews. Don't get it confused. >The people in Gaza are not, and never have been, "Palestinians". The people of gaza are jordanians you fucking mongoloid. they're arabs exactly like the jordanians, they're the same peoples. Neocons are not "soft" fascists, nor are they "fascists" More reading and less making shit up please. https://archive.today/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism so you dont look like a fucking idiot.

>>44833 >They're sandniggers that were turned into a "people" by the USSR Hmm, where have I heard THIS pilpul tactic before? Do you only use it on /pol/, or are there other right-wing sites you post it on?

>>44835 >>44834 >the jews where NOT phillistines It's awfully obvious you didn't click on a single damn source I provided. >the people of gaza are jordanians If that's true, why isn't Jordan allow those people to return: archive.ph/I2yfM <Jordan’s King Abdullah II gave a similar message a day earlier, saying, “No refugees in Jordan, no refugees in Egypt.” >More reading Funny thing. First is that Kikpedia is not a source. The site's been known for years to be extremely inaccurate in it's articles for the purposes of pushing a political agenda. Second is that you're telling me to "get some reading", yet you're refusing to read any of the links I provided, one of which I regretfully included being the Kikepedia page, but I guess I shouldn't worry about that now since you're telling that the site is "A-okay" for quoting.

>>44847 >If that's true, why isn't Jordan allow those people to return: Because they already did it once and they damn near toppled the government for being in israels pocket. You're too ignorant on the subject. Palestinians and Jordanians are the same arabs. Ethnically the same. https://archive.today/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_Palestinians https://archive.today/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/#:~:text=The%20comparison%20with%20other%20Mediterranean,Egyptians%2C%20Armenians%2C%20and%20Iranians. https://archive.today/https://www.hrw.org/report/2010/02/01/stateless-again/palestinian-origin-jordanians-deprived-their-nationality#:~:text=More%20than%20half%20of%20the%206.3%20million,persons%20of%20Palestinian%20origin%20have%20Jordanian%20citizenship. I don't give a fuck what you think is or isnt a source, you're wrong. Palestinians and Jordanians share genetic lineage and you can't prove otherwise, you could if you would provide a study showing they're ethnically different, but you can't.

>>44847 >>https://archive.today/https://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/article/when-palestine-meant-israel/ >https://archive.today/https://ulondon.academia.edu/DavidJacobson David jacobson totally not a jew claiming palestine doesnt come form philistinia TOTALLY NOT A SELF SERVING ARGUMENT OY VEY LMAO entire argument discarded you're a jew. Lets look at your other source it Its even more hilarious and self-serving! -archive.ph/HXB0C#Controversies_and_disputes >References to Jews in Europe as Palestinians European Jews were commonly considered an "Oriental" people in many of their host countries, usually as reference to their ancestral origins in the Middle East. A prominent example of this was the 18th-century Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant, who referred to European Jews as "Palestinians living among us."[10][11] >Israeli Jewish usage >Ben-Zion Meir Hai Uziel (born in 1880 in Jerusalem) was the Sephardi chief rabbi of Mandatory Palestine from 1939 to 1948, and of Israel from 1948 to 1954. >Mordechai Eliyahu (born in 1929 in Jerusalem) was a prominent rabbi, >Uri Davis, an Israeli citizen, >Tali Fahima, an Israeli pro-Palestinian activist, >Actor, director and activist Juliano Mer-Khamis, the son of an Israeli Jewish mother and a Palestinian father totally not a self-serving argument being made here Shut up jew

>>44858 >Because they already did it once and they damn near toppled the government for being in israels pocket. Care to rephrase that? Are you saying that the Palestinians are a MOSSAD operation just like ISIS (In which case, why do you care if they're being exterminated? They're a bunch of useful idiots.), or are you saying that Jordan is sympathetic towards Israel, in which case... >Palestinians and Jordanians are the same arabs. Ethnically the same. >Palestinians and Jordanians share genetic lineage and you can't prove otherwise Then there must be a reason why Jordan refuses to allow in Palestinian refugees in the first place. Could it perhaps be because, I don't know, they have ZERO legitmate claims and only exists as a disruptive element in the region? In that case, again, why do you care how they're treated? They're a terrorist organization.

>>44860 >Care to rephrase that? Are you saying that the Palestinians are a MOSSAD operation just like ISIS That was many decades before isis even existed you really are an ignorant jew >or are you saying that Jordan is sympathetic towards Israel, in which case... Is the jordanian government not a signatory to the abraham accords? Pissrael has no legitimate claim to be a state of jews and for jews in the region. Shut up jew

>>44861 >That was many decades before isis even existed So the Palestinians WERE created by MOSSAD? >Is the jordanian government not a signatory to the abraham accords? From what I can find, no. In fact, here's how they view the entire matter: archive.ph/zBWaK <Daoud Kuttab, a Jordanian columnist with Al-Monitor and Arab News, told JI, however, that the Abraham Accords does not hold great significance for Jordan because “there is already a peace treaty with Israel and that is more advanced than normalization.” <What bothers the Jordanians, he said, is that they constantly feel belittled by Israel and see many of the Jewish states’ promises to its neighbor being broken. <“Jordanians feel that Israel looks down on them, that it does not take Jordan seriously,” Kuttab continued, listing multiple promises and guarantees made during previous meet-ups and summits between Abdullah and Netanyahu that were not fulfilled or kept. <He noted a set of understandings reached between the leaders in 2014 with mediation from then-U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in which Israel committed to preventing radical and extremist Jews from repeatedly visiting the Temple Mount. <“Radical people have ulterior motives, they are not coming as tourists, they are coming to change the status,” Kuttab noted. “The Jordanians are right in worrying that the repeat visitors and extremist visitors are not coming to visit like any normal tourist would come but they have these ulterior motives, and that worries the Jordanians.” <In a brief published last month by the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, Jonathan Schanzer, the think tank’s senior vice president for research, noted that Jordan’s ongoing frustration towards its neighbor to the west is working counter to the spirit of the Accords, not only unsettling the region but also hindering U.S. national security interests. <“Ties between Jordan and Israel are currently at a low point,” he wrote, outlining Jordan’s social and economic woes, as well as the dominance of the Palestinian issue on the political country’s agenda. “A return to the fundamentals, with a concurrent embrace of the new regional order, are key to a prosperous and secure future for both American allies.” So here brings forward the question: if Jordinians and Palestinians are the same people, and Jordan is increasingly untrustworthy of Israel because of them failing to maintain already-existing treaties and argeements, why is the Jordan government refusing to "help" the Palestinians? Not to the point of armament or anything like that, but just allowing in refugees like the women and children "stuck" in the middle of a warzone.

>>44862 >So the Palestinians WERE created by MOSSAD? man you lost the argument so hard

>>44847 >It's awfully obvious you didn't click on a single damn source I provided. Of course not, why should I read sources from a stupid lying nigger like you?

>>44863 >>44875 You retardation all fall apart when considering the fact Palestinian DNA matches with the DNA of Bronze Age population and the Philistines that came afterward. They have existed way before the Israelites and constantly existed on that land. When Assyrian scattered the Israelites they continue to existed, when Babylonian did it they continue to existed, and when Roman did it they continue to existed. They are not some random group of subhuman given the title Palestinian by Soviet intelligence to attack Israel.

>>44895 thanks for that

>>44895 That image doesn't say waht you think it says. If I'm reading it right, here's how the Middle East should be "divided" between Palestinians and Kikes.

>>44895 >>44902 Excuse me, had to make a little correction.

>>44902 >>44903 I think the entire middle east should belong to the white man, except for Mecca which should be irradiated.

>>44902 The image says the Palestinians are descendant of the first civilization build in Levant. You can not spin it any other way. >>44915 If White man serve Jews then he deserve nothing along with every other race but going to the blender and making way for a new race as even they are prove them useless.

>>44937 *proven themselves

>>44937 >If White man serve Jews then he deserve nothing along with every other race but going to the blender and making way for a new race as even they are prove them useless. Every race serves the Jews to some extent, including yours. This is ZOGworld after all. Jews use you pakis as a bioweapon against the anglosax as revenge for not giving them Palestine sooner.

>>21793 It was a pagan Wotanist named David lane that came up with the slogan 1488. said Wotan also stood for Will Of The Aryan Nation

>>44937 >The image says the Palestinians are descendant of the first civilization build in Levant. For how far and for how long is that game played? Does a "peoples" have eternal rights over a land, or is there a certain point where they lose it? What about if they leave? What if they sell it to someone else? What if they're conquered? What if theu're relocated elsewhere? And so on. Take the example of Ukraine. You have a lot of people arguing that they have " no right" to that territory because it was established by the USSR, who imported millions of Russians, but the Ukrainians were there first. Or what about all the territories in dispute with West Taiwan. They never had any claim to Tibet. Korea they occupied. Manchuria was always it's own nation. Not to mention that the CCP are consisting of "Han Chinese" who habe zero genetical or historical heritage with the "traditional" Han Chinese that have since fled to other territories. What about America as well? Should we be expected to forfieght all of our lands, even ones we gained through legitmate trade and agreements, because the American Indians arrived first? But also what about the American-Indians who have been slaughtering each other for millennia in an endless game in cinquest? So, again, how do you want to play this game?

>>44949 >For how far and for how long is that game played? Does a "peoples" have eternal rights over a land, or is there a certain point where they lose it? What about if they leave? What if they sell it to someone else? What if they're conquered? What if theu're relocated elsewhere? These would all be well and good arguments and questions if it wasn't for the jews creating a country and government in the levant guided by zionist principles in order to rule europe, america and complete the circle of white genocide. jews dont deserve shit but the hot end of an oven.

>>44950 >if it wasn't for the jews Do you have any other arguments?

>>44952 Do you have a counter argument? Im willing to hear you out.

>>44954 >Do you have a counter argument? What race is Bill Gates? And Klaus Schwab?And Jeff Bezos? And Robert Muller? And the Clintons? >Im willing to hear you out. No, you're not. In fact, I find a little funny that, in another thread, you're dismissed arguments because they sounded like they came from Alex Jones despite the sources provided, yet here you're declaring that the problem is "always" the Kikes and going on about "white genocide" as if they're the one and "only" group who's pushing for that.

>>44958 I mean yeah, the problem IS the jews >What race is Bill Gates? And Klaus Schwab?And Jeff Bezos? And Robert Muller? And the Clintons? This is what you call "Front goys", the gentiles in jews service who idiot conservatives point to because theyre too chicken shit to call out jewish power. The problem is 100% the jews, not my fault you can't see deal with reality.

>>44963 >I mean yeah, the problem IS the jews So once the Kikes are all wiped out, every single problem with the world is going to end. Is that your thesis? Actually, wait a second, before I present that, how far does this go? Because a lot of people have some Jewish blood in them. It's always been a joke that even your average /pol/ user has Jewish heritage "somewhere" in their family tree. So, first, who's considered a "Jew"? Second, and to my original question, do you literally and unironically believe that every single "problem" in the world is going to end the moment every single "Jew" is extermianted? >This is what you call "Front goys" <Honorary Kikes Okay, your argument is shit.

>>44973 My argument is not shit, its actually very objective and in fact you proved it, you refuse to call out jewish power. You don't even acknowledge it. >do you literally and unironically believe that every single "problem" in the world is going to end the moment every single "Jew" is extermianted? Yes 100% starting with you.

>>44974 >My argument is not shit You're arguing that society and the world will forever remain shit until we wipe out every single one of the Kikes. And NOT JUST the people religiously or genetically Jewish, but also the people that you deem to be "Honorary Kikes" through some arbitrary metric. To put it simply, your idea is "Critical Jew Theory". The exact same platform as CRT, except with "Kikes" being the oppressors instead of whites. To put it simply, you're a Communist.

>>44975 >To put it simply, your idea is "Critical Jew Theory". Yes I am very critical of jews I like that, thats my ideology now.

>>44975 > To put it simply, your idea is "Critical Jew Theory". The exact same platform as CRT, except with "Kikes" being the oppressors instead of whites. Ah, the classic "Pro-whites are the REAL woke!" argument. Elon Lost btw

>>44976 >Yes I am very critical of jews archive.ph/wtZqR <Critical consciousness, the core of social justice teaching, is a heightened awareness of the world and the power structures that shape it. So you're a social justice warrior. Congratulations, you're the very evil you're declaring you're against. >>44978 >Pro-whites are the REAL woke! They always were. They can never define what makes someone "white", or suffer from cognative dissonance as they try to exclude certain groups they don't like (Like the Irish and the Poles). Even then, the biggest irony that keeps cropping is that the "biggest" so-called "Pro White" people aren't even white. Dan Burros is a classic example, but if you need more recent (((coincidences))), there's this: archive.ph/JspVv And this: archive.ph/1PoW9 And this: archive.ph/9SypS AND this: archive.ph/64Dfz Not to mention ALL the times it's also revealed that so-called "Pro-White" groups are actually government honeypots like here: archive.ph/cqIRP And here: archive.ph/0BOKr And here: archive.ph/jd29o And here: archive.ph/Te9C7 In fact, there's an entire history of how all this "Pro-white" shit is outright fake and nothing more than a government psyop: archive.ph/qr4IA

>>44979 you already told me you dont have the balls or the brains to be critical of jews, Ill do it for you dont worry. Ill do the work.

>>44980 >you already told me you dont have the balls or the brains to be critical of jews No, it's because I'm not a fucking Gnostic seeking to overthrow and become the demiurge. It's like calling someone a "coward" because they don't believe in the Nordic traditions that you need to die in battle in order to enter heaven. It's a religion and belief system that I don't adhere to whatsoever.

>>44985 >No, it's because I'm not a fucking Gnostic seeking to overthrow and become the demiurge. So youll explicitly use any metaphor than ever calling out the jews and jewish power directly huh? are you afraid of jews or something?

>>44978 >"you can't outtrain being retarded" >imports subhumans that literally consume feces, trains them instead

>>44986 >So youll explicitly use any metaphor It's not a metaphor, and it's funny that you think that.

>Gen Z Is Returning To Religion. Why? archive.ph/qIQcU <In the past, the younger generation tended to rebel against the religious norms of their parents. Young people’s resistance to the rules and institutions of religion was assumed and expected. But that’s not the case anymore. <According to a recent article from Axios, members of Gen Z—which includes young people born between 1997 and 2012—are actually more likely to go to weekly religious services than millennials and young Gen Xers. <According to some reports, church attendance has quadrupled amongst Gen Zers in recent years. <America witnessed a steady decline in Christianity from the 1970s through the 1990s, with only about 46 percent of Americans born in the ’90s identifying as Christian. Yet that falling trend has abruptly halted, likely due to a surge in religiosity amongst young Americans, particularly young men. Some Catholic dioceses, for instance, have reported a 70 percent increase in converts this year compared to last, and many of these new converts are people in their teens and twenties. The winds have changed. <The phenomenon is not restricted to just the United States, either. Throughout the West—which has for so long been the graveyard of Christian civilization, dominated by an aggressive liberal secularism—there are signs of a religious renaissance. In Britain, for example, the percentage of people aged 18 to 24 who attend church at least once a month spiked from 4 percent in 2018 to 16 percent in 2025. This included a 21 percent gain among young men. Meanwhile, across the channel in France, the Catholic Church baptized more than 10,000 adults at the 2025 Easter Vigil—a 45 percent increase over baptisms in 2024, and a 90 percent increase over 2023. <Even in the Netherlands—which is certainly no bastion of Catholicism—priests are noticing an increase in young people attending Mass. According to Dutch Cardinal Willem Eijk, “The numbers are not huge in the Netherlands, but we hear these noises from almost every pastor. It is clear that something is happening. We also see it reflected in the interest in the priesthood: there are many new applications.”