>>41056 Was the incident filmed? Also will it be released before trial or after?

>>41065 I doubt it. If someone was filming during the incident they probably didn't have their camera pointed at the bleachers. Seems like an open and shut case though, they have a bloody knife with fingerprints and several witnesses. It was obviously a murder.

This is an interesting case. The verdict will depend on: 1. Composition of jury. If it’s all white moms and dads they’ll convict no matter what. But one SJW could cause a hung Jury if she/he isn’t bullied into line by the majority. 2. Eye witnesses. If the Defense can put people on the stand who said they saw Metcalf initiate violence than a conviction becomes difficult (a tent is not legally a personal dwelling). If the Prosecution can put out an image of a wild knife attack it’ll be slam dunk. If the Defense can paint an image of the defendant protecting himself from physical assault it’ll be much more iffy and depend on the jury composition. Since blacks are the religion of the left wing there’s a chance an activist will infiltrate the Jury and a real chance that the judge will actively try to get in the way of the Prosecution's case.

>>41069 Nope. He turned himself in and admitted to stabbing Metcalf. He claims self-defense, His conviction of murder depends on whether or not his legal team (legal fundraiser over $500k atm) can convince a jury that it was self-defense. It’ll come down to eyewitnesses and the composition of the Jury. Since he is getting a top-rung defense team and not the usual public defender his chances are pretty decent, but we really can’t know until the trail actually starts, Remember that OJ was found Not Guilty.

>>41075 Sorry leaf, but here in the states, murder is murder, not healthcare. Sorry if you find that confusing.

>>41191 ….what? Are there not jury trials in the U.S.? I don’t get it.

>>41194 You're insane if you think he's gonna win the trial.

>>41195 I think you disconnected from what the "general" American thinks and does.

>>41056 >nigga

>>41195 How on this planet EARTH can you make that claim after OJ Simpson? Are you a (Hello, I just arrived from Discord, please bully me)? Do you not understand why the Metcalf dad was out apologizing for racism?

>>41245 And if this site continues filtering common slang words this board has no future.

>>41245 >>41247 Whatever nigger.

>>41247 It's not the site, it's the n0rmie-ass BO

>>41069 I honestly thought it would be given that someone is always pointing their phone in front of them. >>41073 >>41075 It is an interesting case due to politics but it should not be. After the stabbing, the suspect ran for it. This is technically what he should have done "as self defence". A jury isn't going to be 12 internet tough guys, it's going to be a bunch of plebs that will have fight or flight well explained to them. Then there's appropriate force. Over here certain people call it "the two punch rule" as in you can usually get away with punching your attacker twice and anything more than that is going to be hard to justify as defence. Going at someone with a knife would have to be appropriate to the attack on the suspect's person and while I doubt that is the case, it would be nice to see it in 8k video. The perfect self defence case would be to defend with appropriate force and then to call an ambulance while administering first aid if required. Fleeing the scene is as poisonous to the self defence argument as shooting someone in the back.

>>41191 >>41195 >murder is murder Wrong. The prosecution is gunning for 1st degree murder. "Nigs nigging" can always be written off as 3rd degree murder, which could let him walk.

>>41405 1st degree murder is a tough challenge I’m surprised they didn’t try to plea him down. How is Texas on self-defense? The defense fund is over $500k so they will get a high-class representation and access to all sorts of experts and investigators — full-on murder may be challenging. People never consider that Rittenhouse benefited from an incompetent prosecution AND a defense-friendly judge. That MAY NOT be the case at all in this trial. The Prosecutor may be competent and the judge may be on a pro-woke agenda bandwagon due to Trump etc. And even in cases where there’s a rock-solid evidence a superior defense team can cast so much doubt that it makes the jury doubt common sense, especially if convicting may be seen as racist by society.

I also forgot to add: think society isn’t woke enough to completely destroy justice? Derek Chauvin ate a 2nd degree murder conviction for 23 years in prison. Why Because it would racist not to. Why don’t you people understand that liberalism is the ruling / prevailing majority power axis in society? If it gets in the public spotlight there’s NO guarantee of a fair verdict.

>>41075 >OJ There is evidence that it was his son Jason who did the murders of his jewish whore wife and her jewish boyfriend. Jason faked his timecard from his work that night and had a history of violence towards women. A police friend of Nicole said she thought Jason was peeping on her. He had also threatened a former boss with a knife who was a kike. If you can find the documentary made by Bill Dear, I recommend watching it. There is much more I'm forgetting.

>>41456 Is it this one? https://archive.today/https://www.(Webm or) USE https://archive.today/https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=SW-_5HeTTd8 >360p wth

>>41491 Well linking didn't work. It's on YT though.