btw, the price fixing will make legal med supplies go into shortage and black markets for diabetos meds will spring up by next year

>>44073 Only because the entire US economy is gay and jewish Insulin is 50 times cheaper in Turkyiv archive.is/https://archive.today/https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/cost-of-insulin-by-country

The economy is fake and bullshit. They'll keep the status quo running until all the old farts die. Once that happens? We're fucked

>>44073 >make legal med supplies go into shortage and black markets Isn't that because all of the pharmaceutical companies are based out of Europe (If not owned by orpartnered with a European company), who manufacture all their meds in West Taiwan, and charge Americans at inflated prices because their domestic markets back home are already strangled by the populace being taxed 50%-70% of their income in order to pay for their "healthcare paradise"? Not to mention how many of these companies are dropping half-assed and potentially lethal drugs onto the American market that would get them shut down if they dared to do the same thing in Europe? And that's also leaving out that people are finding out how substances than have been on the market for decades, healthy eating, going outside, and fucking SMILING have greater benefits for one's health than any of these meds provide. OR that the increasing solution proposed by governments to all these ALREADY inflating "healthcare costs" is to convince the populace to commit suicide? But yes, the problem is most certainly Trump's tariffs. Globalism did nothing wrong!!!

>>44082 >muh globalism The US is a globalist nation by default. It just so happens that the inflated prices fall in line with what happens in said economy but the US government is pointing fingers as usual as its not willing to take responsibility of the problem at hand. The tariffs are just a pathetic attempt at helping their kikes keep the hegemony, not some 5D chess

>>44083 >The US is a globalist nation by default That's true of almost EVERY country for the past 50 years. >The tariffs are just a pathetic attempt at helping their kikes keep the hegemony By making pharmaceuticals so expensive that no one can afford them, thereby causing these company collapse as no one is able to buy their products, especially when generic brands are performing so much better in treating illnesses? Yeah, that DEFINATELY sounds like a "big brained" stunt to pull: <Cause a trade war <Trade war causes prices to rise <No one can buy products because prices are too high <??? <PROFIT!!!

>>44084 that does sound like a desperate chimp-out because they're no longer the international police they once were

>>44072 >economist and finance experts All jews, so all liars. USA will be better than ever. The leftardist countries are the ones that will all become poor. >>44073 It will kill l/g/b/t abominations who need their meds to prevent their hormone changes from killing them, so it is a good thing. >>44082 Globalism is cancer and it is a joy to watch it die. All leftards like you will be soon killed. >>44083 >>44084 >>44086 Nobody has any duty to care for leftards. You deserve only death. Globalism is dead. And everyone who is actually successful and whose lives actually matter are celebrating it's death, rightfully so.

>>44072 He should have lifted taxes and reworked government policies to make American corporation be more ethical and assist them prosper. The tariffs are not going to help many middle class businesses. Market have a right to freely trade, if you feel like trading some nation/country/union is hurting your country then simply banned import or export from them; market will adjust itself and find new trade partners. But putting tariffs one all import will just make things expensive.

>>44109 >He should have lifted taxes and reworked government policies to make American corporation be more ethical That's not how it works. A company doesn't exist to be "ethical". The moment you start making those agruments is the moment the company stops existing to serve it's customers (And shareholders), and starts existing for the purposes of pushing a political agenda and being an arm of the government. Because guess what, programs like DEI and the climate scam are EXACTLY the inevitable result of trying to force companies to be "moral" and "ethical". And if you hate that shit, then you shouldn't be making such stupid fucking proposals in the first fucking place. >Market have a right to freely trade No, they don't. >if you feel like trading some nation/country/union is hurting your country then simply banned import or export from them; market will adjust itself and find new trade partners That's exactly what's going on right now, and you people are bitching about it. >But putting tariffs one all import will just make things expensive. That's our fault for relying so much on imports in the first place. And is no one going to address the fact that, if you're economy is dependent upon importing your goods, then that makes your country dependent upon someone else? AND that other person could start jacking up their rates whenever they want, and you have nowhere else to go as you made your economy entirely dependent upon them. MEANING that the "inevitable" result of such a situation is that you either continue importing as prices rise and your manufacturer bleeds you dry OR you cut yourself off from them, experience a temporary increase in prices as you try to find/create a domestic supplier, and then see the prices drop back down, with the added benefit that you now have more options available.

>>44122 Company have multiple stakeholders. Most important one are customers and Shareholders. But secondary stakeholders also exist. For example, the community your plant next is suffering from diseases from all the pollution you have released. And your employees are also secondary stakeholders who deserve things like paid vacation to spend time with family or spending on the office to add cafeteria or coffee machine to make it bearable to sit in one cubicle and work most of your career in it. You don't have to go that far as to force DEI and climate policies on them. If companies that treat their employees right it will cause the decline in birth rate that plague most of the Western world. And it is purposely done by Jews. Same applies with pollution part; if you are releasing micro plastic that end up in their drinking water now that can effect fertility rate. Their duty is not to the customers and shareholders.

>>44100 >globalism is dead lmfao, I wish >(1)

>>44134 >Company have multiple stakeholders No, they don't. Fuck the concept of stakeholders. >But secondary stakeholders also exist No, they don't. >the community your plant next is suffering from diseases from all the pollution you have released Why would a company build a plant in a suburban neighborhood? That doesn't offer any opportunity for the plant to grow, nor offer any real estate benefit. >And your employees are also secondary stakeholders No, they're not. In fact, the employee has much more freedom than a company as the employee can choose to leave and work for someone else who offers better benefits. But there also comes the point where the benefits being "asked" for are not realistic nor plausible. And it's not the job of the company to bend over backwards in order to accommodate those benefits. >You don't have to go that far as to force DEI and climate policies on them Yes, you do, it is the inevitable result once your start demanding that companies acquire a "conscious" by law. It doesn't matter if you don't "intend" that to be the result, nor that you disagree with DEI by want them to be "moral" in other ways. The problem at the end of the day is that you're forcing companies to care about subjects that (1) don't have any relation to them making a better product/service and (2) doesn't have any relation towards allowing them to increase the amount of money that they generate. >Their duty is not to the customers and shareholders. Yes, it is.

NOTHING WILL CHANGE There won’t be hyperinflation. Prices won’t go up (more than usual), the ports won’t be empty, not one cheap consumer good won’t still be available for cheap. Jobs will not come back, no one is doing big investments in American production and trade relations aren’t being “reset”. The tariffs are a fucking TAX to generate REVENUE for their fucking spending bill they knew they were going to do. DOGE was supposed to make big cuts, but the public sector unions with the courts came out to slam that shit closed in their face. All of the reciprocal tariff shit was literally just an optics ritual where countries form mostly useless trade deals to make it look like the admin won something. The 10% won’t go away ever because that’s the actual tax they’re trying to make revenue from. CHINA IS NOT PAYING SHIT, everything from China will be shipped in via evasion systems. That’s why the markets actually didn’t care that much. This whole thing is literally just a media trauma to whip the public up to take action against Trump — and they’ve been largely successful, and it’s by no means at max level. Trump is CURRENTLY a lame duck President, forget about what will happen after the midterms. So to anyone who’s been sucked in by the media agitprop, RELAX the US is on the exact same glide path to collapse as it was on for many years, there won’t be any huge upsets, and you’ll be able to ride the collapse down on cheap consumer goods in as much comfort as the system allows for normal people. There’s TOO MUCH money, TOO MANY interconnected and intersecting interests in the government for it to do ANYTHING except fill the money printer trough, period.

>>44072 >>every economist and finance experts agreed that US is going to end in massive bailout in a year time Or just hear me out let the company's that cannot compete fail, To big to fail has gone on for fat to long.

>>44301 >tax cuts for the ultra rich You do realize that small business owners can take advantage of those same tax cuts, right?

>>44304 >Small businesses were part of the losers. Before or after COVID?

>>44309 >2017 was before Covid. And how did it impact small businesses during 2018 and 2019? Because this is the results I'm finding: archive.ph/l5ygc >Millions of small business owners are taking advantage of the Small Business Deduction, which continues to provide a big boost to the national economy. That’s according to the NFIB’s latest member survey, which shows 83 percent of small business owners believe 2017’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is having a positive impact on the economy. archive.ph/7uh6u >Besides the corporate tax cuts, the other tax-reform provisions that had the most important effects on investment were the tax cuts for individuals and pass-through businesses, the increase in the first-year bonus depreciation, the scheduled amortization of R&D expenses, and the limit on interest deductibility.

>>44311 >Inflation = bad No, it's not. Inflation is only "bad" if you equate value to a number. I don't think the owners of Bitcoin are complaining about how the price inflated from $1 buying you 1579 Bitcoin to now ONE Bitcoin being worth $106k. >The individuals and small businesses with the least money That seems like an awfully specific group. What about your average individual and your average small business? You know, the majority of the population instead of the minority of people who are experiencing how shit life can be sometimes. >And he did QE in 2020 And by all metrics, that was "needed" for the purposes of restarting the economy that had entirely came to a screeching halt thanks to the lock downs. >Then Biden did QE Yeah, and he did it twice. And it absolutely was NOT needed because, as people realized and learned when Trump did it, and why it failed, majority of the money never went into the economy and instead went into people's savings. So why did Brandon do it?

>>44315 >It's okay when Trump does it Not realy, no. As I said, the first stimulus was a failure, mostly because it didn't solve bigger issue that people couldn't do anything because of state and local governments threatening people to stay indoors. And also because printing money, even if it's for a "good reason", is going to cause devaluation. >Or not lol. I genuinely can't tell if you meant to walk it back or not Are you projecting? >Remember the whole supply chain lockups Which we still haven't fixed. And any attempt to fix it now with the tariffs is treated as a some kind of heretical act. >inflation You want to know the funny thing about inflation? It's always happening. The only difference is how fast or slow it's occuring. It's like how people were praising the few times that inflation was "low" under Brandon as some miracle when the reality was that prices were still going up. >and unemployment increasing the cost of living That's not how it works at all. Where the fuck did you learn economics? archive.ph/UL1qj <The economic costs of unemployment are probably more obvious when they're viewed through the lens of the national checkbook. Unemployment can lead to higher payments from state and federal governments for unemployment benefits, food assistance, and Medicaid. <Even those receiving government support can't spend at prior levels. The production of these workers leaves the economy. This reduces the gross domestic product (GDP) and moves the country away from the efficient allocation of its resources. Those who subscribe to Jean-Baptiste Say’s theory that the production of goods creates demand say that this is a serious issue. <It is also worth noting that companies pay a price for high unemployment as well. Unemployment benefits are financed largely by taxes assessed on businesses. archive.ph/i3XKC <In addition to effects on the individual and societal levels, unemployment also directly impacts the economy as a whole. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, when people are unemployed, they spend less money, which ultimately contributes to less contribution to the economy in relation to services or goods sold and produced. <Unemployed persons also experience a reduced purchasing power which can leave other individuals who create products that were purchased by these individuals without jobs as well. <Additionally, more than 70% of what the United States economy produces is purchased by consumers. Unemployed individuals consume much less than those who are employed, so a higher unemployment rate can leave the economy lacking in terms of products sold. This can leave organizations with decreased revenue.

>>44322 >Please stop suggesting absolutely retarded shit like "tariffs fix supply lines" What do you suggest should be done then to "fix" the supply chains and big manufacutring back home?

>>44072 Nothing and I repeat NOTHING ever happens. Hope I made myself clear.

>>44328 >Supply lines were fine after Covid <Having majority of a country's products manufactured outside of the country is "fine" >"Big manufacturing" is never coming back to the US Why? >Companies have been EXPLICITLY telling us for decades now that they will NOT move back to America because they would have to pay Americans comparably really high wages Okay. And I won't buy products from those companies. >you are the beneficiary of this cheap manufacturing No, I'm not, as I'm currently unemployed majority of the time and cannot find a place that pays a decent wage. >Like the cheap electronics used in your computer. Majority of the tech I use is from 15-20 years ago. How does this "benefit" me? >You don't really want any of this. Yes, I do. >You don't want to work your 9-5 sitting in a largely autonomous iPhone manufacturing/assembly warehouse all so you can buy your now $2k iPhone Max. Why would I need to buy a new iPhone when my Nokia flip-phone does everything that I want or need? And everything that it "doesn't", that's what my PSP or Compaq are for. In addition to that, when I WAS working at one of the few assembly plants still active (Making packaging material), I had no problem with the work as I was left alone to listen to whatever I wanted during the time I worked, managed by breaks in such a way that I could get personal tasks accomplished, and the pay was decent enough that I could then use the extra money left over to invest in things that would benefit my future like buying stocks and precious metals. The only reason I left was because I got tired of my boss micromanaging everything.

>>44334 >kek you say this as...etc etc. It's interesting how yoiu pivotted to mocking my post instead of answer the questions why "big manufacturing" will never return? Or how cheap electronics "benefit" me when I use outdated tech to begin with? Or why I "need" to buy a new phone when my current one works fine? Nor have explained what Trump "should" be doing if he wanted to bring back manufacturing? And so on.