This newly pushed jewish narrative that "there is no historical evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ of Nazareth" is a thoroughly debunked fringe theory. This is an intentional push by Mossad/sayanim/jews. For the first time in almost 20 years the Wikipedia article: "The Historicity of Jesus" has been edited to remove the debunking of this theory and present it as more neutral. This charge has been lead almost entirely by a user going by the screen name "GetOverYourWikiSelf": https://archive.today/https://www.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AGetOverYourWikiSelf&redlink=1 The article in question: https://archive.today/https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus How it appeared until just three months ago: https://archive.today/https://web.archive.org/web/20230628092500/https://archive.today/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus Looking at the talk page, it appears the user in question first argued that all of the citations verifying that Jesus was a historical figure made it difficult to read the article and got them removed, before then moving on and saying since there were no citations to back up the claim they had to reword the article to be more neutral. This occured between July-September 2025, no doubt as a preamble to gear up for this sayanim Joseph Atwill's book tour where they were going to push this satanic theory. I wouldn't be surprised if the Wikipedia user was Atwill himself in a Thomas Lockley/Yasuke the black Samurai situation. Pic rel: how the article has appeared for the last 20 years. Takedowns of Atwills book: > https://archive.today/https://evidenceunseen.com/apologetics/book-reviews/a-critique-of-joseph-atwills-caesars-messiah > https://archive.today/https://www.persephonespath.com/defending-truth-can-mean-defending-jesus/ > https://archive.today/https://www.robertmprice.mindvendor.com/rev_atwill.htm