/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Where lolis are free speech and Hitler did nothing wrong

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0 (Temporarily Dead).



8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Be sure to visit /polarchive/ for file libraries and our companions at /pol/ alternative and /hispol/ Also remember the boards for The 8moe Hub, The 8moe Lounge, Animation, Board Games, Books, Degenerates, Eagles, Fitness, Food, Japan, LOL, Magic, Random, Stonks, Technology, The Royal Palace, Those Who Consort With Beasts, Video Games, and Weapons Remember to archive all links, and videos should be attached to posts or using a front end

(164.74 KB 908x1856 1745848005.png)

Distributism Thread Anonymous 10/23/2025 (Thu) 01:35:05 Id: 613668 No. 46931
The Filter Event: Ideologies of Centralization The drake equation estimates that there may be as many as 12500 extra-terrestrial life forms in the Milky Way alone. Scientists have found many potentially habitable planets, but scientists have yet to find another civilization. So where are the aliens? The Great Filter is the idea that there is a natural barrier in the development of life preventing the existence of space faring extra-terrestrial life. What would such a barrier look like and how would it take place? First, we will make five assumptions. First assumption, the Great Filter is in the future not the past. We have already seen life evolve once so we know it is possible. Second assumption, any intelligent life that would evolve would be as just as greedy as humanity as resource acquisition would be just as important for their survival as it is for ours. Third assumption, hierarchal social structures will naturally form as they do in humans and other animals. Fourth assumption, any intelligent life will use technology to improve their productive processes. Fifth and final assumption, the great filter is obvious enough that every intelligent civilization will eventually do it. Weapons of mass destruction and AI uprising have been proposed by as possible answers to the great filter, but both theories fall flat. Even insane dictators like Kim Jong Un show restrain with nuclear, biological and chemical weapons; No one wants to rule over a wasteland. And if AI was the answer, wouldn’t scientists see machine intelligences colonizing the galaxy? So, then what would be obvious enough that every intelligent life form would do it? How would a greedy, hierarchal, technologically advanced civilization commit suicide if not by weapons of mass destruction or AI? The answer: over centralization. Centralizing power would be obvious to any hierarchy of greedy individuals and may even be a necessity to maintain control of a technologically advanced civilization. But how centralizing control leads to extinction bares explanation. The hypothesis goes as follows; at the dawn of an alien civilization’s industrial revolution mass production becomes the dominant mode of production and causes societal disruption. To mitigate this disruption the state becomes increasingly involved in the production process either by regulating industry or outright seizing industry to serve the needs of the state. The state then uses ideology or religion to justify its existence and uses propaganda and “education” to indoctrinate the population. The state slowly but surely grows in power and scope and the population becomes increasingly dependent on the state for survival. The ruling class must continuously expand control to maintain its power as technology becomes more advanced. The level of micromanaging required eventually exceeds the ability of any intelligent being. The ruling elites eventually become more disconnected from the rest of their society and begin making reckless policies. The population which is now completely dependent on the elites obeys these new edicts. As the population becomes more dependent on the elites so to do the elites become more dependent on the population for production. The decisions made by the elite become increasingly reckless and maladaptive until the system fails, and the species dies. This is the filter event. So how to avoid this fate? It starts by creating a self-sufficient, decentralized, adaptable population capable of bouncing back from large shocks. The supply chain collapse of the pandemic (which as of 2025 most of the world is still recovering from) shows the weakness of the current system; it cannot handle systemic shocks. A decentralized network of makers, farmers, scientists, craftsmen, and engineers could be built in the shadow of the current system ready to rebuild after a collapse. What comes next would be distributist economy based on small scale production from 3d printers and other cottage industry scale machinery. If sentient life is to survive the revolution must be open source.
How is this different from Communism, where Marx outright says: <From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
>>46932 Marx is fine with centralizing production so long as "shareholders" are the entire society. Distributism wants maximum distribution of the productive process. Think of it as one system advocating for gigafarms from which everyone is fed vs small farms each family has. Distributism is probably the most eugenic out of the socioeconomic -isms since it pretty severely caps the population growth. I've thought about how it's through these small-scale farming communities that real human progress took place way back when, in colder climes, where family farms had to sink or swim vs the incoming winters, whereas the mega carb production of warmer civilizations feed even the dumbest and the poorest and enable their mass reproduction. America was better when the distribution of production was more equal, not because of some communist ownership ideal, in fact, QoL was lower back then, but because it mean that the ones reproducing were naturally more fit than they are now. Today we get a nigger with a smartphone producing twelve niggers with twelve smartphones, fantastic for GDP, but no doubt civilizationally inferior to a poor white guy in some random Utah shithole banging out seven kids on his farm and having one of them become John Moses Browning, revolutionizing firearms. I think with how bloated states are and how international competition is, it's impossible to make a return to distributism without surrendering global relevance in the short term. Just think of the state of the US - how exactly would you roll back the centralization of capital, military command, politics, etc. without nuking your ability to respond to an emergency vis a vis China, Russia, Iran? It's kind of over in the sense that there is no more terra incognita to plop your flag down in and create a civilization from scratch, "the right way", as done in the past. Everywhere you go there's a billion niggers. In fact, the places where you'd think doing this would make the most sense, some far-off land where civilization has not been tried before, are liable to have the most niggers out of them all. Africa is full of them, Latin America, well, imagine jump-starting a mini distributist civilization deep in the Argentine Patagonia. The government would bring the hammer down on you if local 2-digit-IQ mongrels led by liberal art midwit anti-racists don't get to you first. Probably the best thing any distributist can do today is find a nice community they can install themselves in, preach the word to the people there, and, through involvement in local politics, make it extremely difficult for outsiders to enter the community. Then focus your efforts on sending out "corsairs" out into the world, really community children that will educate themselves at the expense of the state, make money, and then come back (bring "spoils"), and then work hard to keep the money within the community. Keeping outsiders out and the money in will create natural incentives for the people in the community to start businesses for each other. Voila, distributist community. Of course, then the gov. shows up and tells you they're airdropping a couple hundred thousand niggers into the community next week and you're fucked, so, if you're not willing to die for this (and no one is) then there's no possibility of it working out.
>>46933 >vs small farms each family has. What if a someone doesn't want to have a farm? >Distributism is probably the most eugenic out of the socioeconomic -isms since it pretty severely caps the population growth And, stopped reading there. Things either continue growing or they slowly decay and die. All you're doing is just advocating for another system where some intellectual is playing God.
>>46936 >What if a someone doesn't want to have a farm? Then start a business and own it >And, stopped reading there. Things either continue growing or they slowly decay and die. All you're doing is just advocating for another system where some intellectual is playing God. Okay, enjoy your progressive nation of turd worlders. I don't know how people owning their own farms and businesses is a "system where some intellectual is playing God". I'm asking for max decentralization, literally eliminating the possibility of an individual playing God
>>46940 >Then start a business and own it What if I don't want to own a farm? >enjoy your progressive nation of turd worlders Why are you acting like this is the "only" option when EVERY FUCKING TIME THIS FUCKING SYSTEM HAS BEEN FUCKING TRIED it has failed miserably?
>>46940 >I'm asking for max decentralization No, you're not. You're mandating that people live under a system that some intellectual created. There's nothing wrong with centralization, especially when it's a creation that so few people want or are able to create. Something like a garden one's backyard, that's. Creating a fucking car is not. Much more the resources to actually maintain the car, to fuel it, and everything else. Or art. In a "maximully decentralized society", I would be the one required to make my own art instead of leaving that task to someone else who happens to be more talented. Stop trying to create these fucking systems that would "work perfectly" only in a world where we wouldn't even need them in the first place. We stuck on a planet where everything sucks is designed to kill us. Stop trying to deny that fact.
>>46943 > Something like a garden one's backyard, that's easy. >We are stuck on a planet where everything sucks and is designed to kill us. Dear God, I need to better proofread my posts.
>>46943 Decentralized communities are going to be the best way forward in the coming decade or two, he's honestly right. You're going to live to witness the jewish technocratic takeover. How do you plan to escape this? You either play ball and integrate to stay in your precious society and end up a slave taxcattle funding your own replacement, or you pull the amish move and create a mini society within the larger society to insulate yourself and actually develop yourself your family and your community apart from the global beast system. Outside of violent revolt and taking over the government this is probably the one most powerful thing you can do to say fuck the system. Probably also why theres cases in the USA of your glowniggers literally chimping out and killing communities who were doing this in the past. I see the writing on the wall myself and people are already doing this shit in my country just because of how dogshit the macro/global economy is now. Farmers markets are huge, private farms are huge, all this shit makes food availability in my small region amazing and cheap. Crime is low, you know your neighbors, everyone can lend a hand when needed etc. I would way rather fucking live in this than what's coming down the pipeline with digital ID, surveillance, AI streamlining all this technocratic overreach bullshit etc
>>46947 >Decentralized communities are going to be the best way forward in the coming decade or two According to whom? The same people at the WEF trying to turn societies into pockets of 15 minute cities? Or the accelerationists who want to make people entirely disconnected from one another as it's much easier to conquer and destroy disconnected pockets of civilizations as opposed to actually united territories of people who have similar interests?
>>46950 According to anyone who doesn't want to be integrated into the global jew beast system. If you're not one of those people, disregard and enjoy your slavery
>>46951 >According to anyone who doesn't want to be integrated into the global jew beast system You haven't answered the question. Excluding fedposters on the net, WHO is actually advocating for this shit?
>>46953 I just told you. No FED wants you to be able to keep your heat on without the major electric companies, or to be able to get food outside of a grocery store. If you haven't figured this out by now you're probably sub 90IQ and don't even understand what decentralization even is. Why don't you look up what a digital ID is and what a CBDC is and try and think about it for yourself, it's already here now, china had it figured out in 2017.
>>46959 >No FED wants you to be able to keep your heat on without the major electric companies Then they would ALSO be banning the sales of personla solar panels and generators. OH WAIT, they're not. >or to be able to get food outside of a grocery store Then stores like Home Depot and Lowes would be facing increased regulation from the EPA when it comes to sales of vegetable and fruits. OH WAIT, they're not. Thus far, all you've have managed to confirm is that all the people pushing the "Distributism" are just looking to take adantage of retards in the internet who don't know what they're talking about.
>>46959 Gunna have to back the other guy, people able to power themselves during outages means a more stable society, so of COURSE they want you to be able to exist (mostly) off-grid. Some states even have tax incentives for such, as well as 'green' incentives for green production (wind, solar). Yeah, produce your own power, grow a fucking garden or algae tank, make yourself semi-self sustaining. The only reason not to is you simply don't have the space (i.e. me atm) I think its the direction we're headed -> people with hydroponics and grow lights in a shitty warehouse, owned by a co-op, pay a small fee monthly and get fed crops from said warehouse. Your monthly fee is also a vote on what they produce, so you have a say in what veggies you can eat. Meat is the problem, and we eternally keep coming up with meat replacements, but eh. Running a chicken coop and getting eggs/chicken doesn't sound that hard or expensive, if you feed them the junk grains not good for market, so if you have enough land to grow grain a coop is just a way to use B-grade grains. >>46962 Agreed, the other Anon has no idea what they're talking about. Zero concept of actual systems in place, and functional.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply