/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Where lolis are free speech and Hitler did nothing wrong

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

-
The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0 (Temporarily Dead).

Happy 12th Birthday, 8chan

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Be sure to visit /polarchive/ for file libraries and our companions at /pol/ alternative and /hispol/ Also remember the boards for The 8moe Hub, The 8moe Lounge, Animation, Board Games, Books, Degenerates, Eagles, Fitness, Food, Japan, LOL, Magic, Random, Stonks, Technology, The Royal Palace, Those Who Consort With Beasts, Video Games, and Weapons Remember to archive all links, and videos should be attached to posts or using a front end

(164.74 KB 908x1856 1745848005.png)

Distributism Thread Anonymous 10/23/2025 (Thu) 01:35:05 Id: 613668 No. 46931
The Filter Event: Ideologies of Centralization The drake equation estimates that there may be as many as 12500 extra-terrestrial life forms in the Milky Way alone. Scientists have found many potentially habitable planets, but scientists have yet to find another civilization. So where are the aliens? The Great Filter is the idea that there is a natural barrier in the development of life preventing the existence of space faring extra-terrestrial life. What would such a barrier look like and how would it take place? First, we will make five assumptions. First assumption, the Great Filter is in the future not the past. We have already seen life evolve once so we know it is possible. Second assumption, any intelligent life that would evolve would be as just as greedy as humanity as resource acquisition would be just as important for their survival as it is for ours. Third assumption, hierarchal social structures will naturally form as they do in humans and other animals. Fourth assumption, any intelligent life will use technology to improve their productive processes. Fifth and final assumption, the great filter is obvious enough that every intelligent civilization will eventually do it. Weapons of mass destruction and AI uprising have been proposed by as possible answers to the great filter, but both theories fall flat. Even insane dictators like Kim Jong Un show restrain with nuclear, biological and chemical weapons; No one wants to rule over a wasteland. And if AI was the answer, wouldn’t scientists see machine intelligences colonizing the galaxy? So, then what would be obvious enough that every intelligent life form would do it? How would a greedy, hierarchal, technologically advanced civilization commit suicide if not by weapons of mass destruction or AI? The answer: over centralization. Centralizing power would be obvious to any hierarchy of greedy individuals and may even be a necessity to maintain control of a technologically advanced civilization. But how centralizing control leads to extinction bares explanation. The hypothesis goes as follows; at the dawn of an alien civilization’s industrial revolution mass production becomes the dominant mode of production and causes societal disruption. To mitigate this disruption the state becomes increasingly involved in the production process either by regulating industry or outright seizing industry to serve the needs of the state. The state then uses ideology or religion to justify its existence and uses propaganda and “education” to indoctrinate the population. The state slowly but surely grows in power and scope and the population becomes increasingly dependent on the state for survival. The ruling class must continuously expand control to maintain its power as technology becomes more advanced. The level of micromanaging required eventually exceeds the ability of any intelligent being. The ruling elites eventually become more disconnected from the rest of their society and begin making reckless policies. The population which is now completely dependent on the elites obeys these new edicts. As the population becomes more dependent on the elites so to do the elites become more dependent on the population for production. The decisions made by the elite become increasingly reckless and maladaptive until the system fails, and the species dies. This is the filter event. So how to avoid this fate? It starts by creating a self-sufficient, decentralized, adaptable population capable of bouncing back from large shocks. The supply chain collapse of the pandemic (which as of 2025 most of the world is still recovering from) shows the weakness of the current system; it cannot handle systemic shocks. A decentralized network of makers, farmers, scientists, craftsmen, and engineers could be built in the shadow of the current system ready to rebuild after a collapse. What comes next would be distributist economy based on small scale production from 3d printers and other cottage industry scale machinery. If sentient life is to survive the revolution must be open source.
How is this different from Communism, where Marx outright says: <From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
>>46932 Marx is fine with centralizing production so long as "shareholders" are the entire society. Distributism wants maximum distribution of the productive process. Think of it as one system advocating for gigafarms from which everyone is fed vs small farms each family has. Distributism is probably the most eugenic out of the socioeconomic -isms since it pretty severely caps the population growth. I've thought about how it's through these small-scale farming communities that real human progress took place way back when, in colder climes, where family farms had to sink or swim vs the incoming winters, whereas the mega carb production of warmer civilizations feed even the dumbest and the poorest and enable their mass reproduction. America was better when the distribution of production was more equal, not because of some communist ownership ideal, in fact, QoL was lower back then, but because it mean that the ones reproducing were naturally more fit than they are now. Today we get a nigger with a smartphone producing twelve niggers with twelve smartphones, fantastic for GDP, but no doubt civilizationally inferior to a poor white guy in some random Utah shithole banging out seven kids on his farm and having one of them become John Moses Browning, revolutionizing firearms. I think with how bloated states are and how international competition is, it's impossible to make a return to distributism without surrendering global relevance in the short term. Just think of the state of the US - how exactly would you roll back the centralization of capital, military command, politics, etc. without nuking your ability to respond to an emergency vis a vis China, Russia, Iran? It's kind of over in the sense that there is no more terra incognita to plop your flag down in and create a civilization from scratch, "the right way", as done in the past. Everywhere you go there's a billion niggers. In fact, the places where you'd think doing this would make the most sense, some far-off land where civilization has not been tried before, are liable to have the most niggers out of them all. Africa is full of them, Latin America, well, imagine jump-starting a mini distributist civilization deep in the Argentine Patagonia. The government would bring the hammer down on you if local 2-digit-IQ mongrels led by liberal art midwit anti-racists don't get to you first. Probably the best thing any distributist can do today is find a nice community they can install themselves in, preach the word to the people there, and, through involvement in local politics, make it extremely difficult for outsiders to enter the community. Then focus your efforts on sending out "corsairs" out into the world, really community children that will educate themselves at the expense of the state, make money, and then come back (bring "spoils"), and then work hard to keep the money within the community. Keeping outsiders out and the money in will create natural incentives for the people in the community to start businesses for each other. Voila, distributist community. Of course, then the gov. shows up and tells you they're airdropping a couple hundred thousand niggers into the community next week and you're fucked, so, if you're not willing to die for this (and no one is) then there's no possibility of it working out.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply